Dataset Information

Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models.

ABSTRACT: Use of knee joint finite element models for diagnostic purposes is challenging due to their complexity. Therefore, simpler models are needed for studies where a high number of patients need to be analyzed, without compromising the results of the model. In this study, more complex, kinetic (forces and moments) and simpler, kinetic-kinematic (forces and angles) driven finite element models were compared during the stance phase of gait. Patella and tendons were included in the most complex model, while they were absent in the simplest model. The greatest difference between the most complex and simplest models was observed in the internal-external rotation and axial joint reaction force, while all other rotations, translations and joint reaction forces were similar to one another. In terms of cartilage stresses and strains, the simpler models behaved similarly with the more complex models in the lateral joint compartment, while minor differences were observed in the medial compartment at the beginning of the stance phase. We suggest that it is feasible to use kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint models with a simpler geometry in studies with a large cohort size, particularly when analyzing cartilage responses and failures related to potential overloads.

SUBMITTER: Bolcos PO

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6255758 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models.

Bolcos Paul O PO Mononen Mika E ME Mohammadi Ali A Ebrahimi Mohammadhossein M Tanaka Matthew S MS Samaan Michael A MA Souza Richard B RB Li Xiaojuan X Suomalainen Juha-Sampo JS Jurvelin Jukka S JS Töyräs Juha J Korhonen Rami K RK

Scientific reports 20181126 1

Use of knee joint finite element models for diagnostic purposes is challenging due to their complexity. Therefore, simpler models are needed for studies where a high number of patients need to be analyzed, without compromising the results of the model. In this study, more complex, kinetic (forces and moments) and simpler, kinetic-kinematic (forces and angles) driven finite element models were compared during the stance phase of gait. Patella and tendons were included in the most complex model, w ...[more]

PMID: 30478347

Similar Datasets

Project description:Finite element (FE) models have been widely used to investigate knee joint biomechanics. Most of these models have been developed to study adult knees, neglecting pediatric populations. In this study, an atlas-based approach was employed to develop subject-specific FE models of the knee for eight typically developing pediatric individuals. Initially, validation simulations were performed at four passive tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) flexion angles, and the resulting TFJ and patellofemoral joint (PFJ) kinematics were compared to corresponding patient-matched measurements derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A neuromusculoskeletal-(NMSK)-FE pipeline was then used to simulate knee biomechanics during stance phase of walking gait for each participant to evaluate model simulation of a common motor task. Validation simulations demonstrated minimal error and strong correlations between FE-predicted and MRI-measured TFJ and PFJ kinematics (ensemble average of root mean square errors < 5 mm for translations and < 4.1° for rotations). The FE-predicted kinematics were strongly correlated with published reports (ensemble average of Pearson's correlation coefficients (ρ) > 0.9 for translations and ρ > 0.8 for rotations), except for TFJ mediolateral translation and abduction/adduction rotation. For walking gait, NMSK-FE model-predicted knee kinematics, contact areas, and contact pressures were consistent with experimental reports from literature. The strong agreement between model predictions and experimental reports underscores the capability of sequentially linked NMSK-FE models to accurately predict pediatric knee kinematics, as well as complex contact pressure distributions across the TFJ articulations. These models hold promise as effective tools for parametric analyses, population-based clinical studies, and enhancing our understanding of various pediatric knee injury mechanisms. They also support intervention design and prediction of surgical outcomes in pediatric populations.

Dataset Information

Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models.

Publications

Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets