Dataset Information

DICER1 and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies.

ABSTRACT: Pathogenic germline DICER1 variants cause a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome with a variety of manifestations. In addition to conferring increased cancer risks for pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) and ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, particularly Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, individuals with pathogenic germline DICER1 variants may also develop lung cysts, cystic nephroma, renal sarcoma and Wilms tumor, nodular hyperplasia of the thyroid, nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, ciliary body medulloepithelioma, genitourinary embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, and brain tumors including pineoblastoma and pituitary blastoma. In May 2016, the International PPB Registry convened the inaugural International DICER1 Symposium to develop consensus testing and surveillance and treatment recommendations. Attendees from North America, Europe, and Russia provided expert representation from the disciplines of pediatric oncology, endocrinology, genetics, genetic counseling, radiology, pediatric surgery, pathology, and clinical research. Recommendations are provided for genetic testing; prenatal management; and surveillance for DICER1-associated pulmonary, renal, gynecologic, thyroid, ophthalmologic, otolaryngologic, and central nervous system tumors and gastrointestinal polyps. Risk for most DICER1-associated neoplasms is highest in early childhood and decreases in adulthood. Individual and caregiver education and judicious imaging-based surveillance are the primary recommended approaches. These testing and surveillance recommendations reflect a consensus of expert opinion and current literature. As DICER1 research expands, guidelines for screening and treatment will continue to be updated. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2251-61. ©2018 AACR.

SUBMITTER: Schultz KAP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6260592 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

DICER1 and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies.

Schultz Kris Ann P KAP Williams Gretchen M GM Kamihara Junne J Stewart Douglas R DR Harris Anne K AK Bauer Andrew J AJ Turner Joyce J Shah Rachana R Schneider Katherine K Schneider Kami Wolfe KW Carr Ann Garrity AG Harney Laura A LA Baldinger Shari S Frazier A Lindsay AL Orbach Daniel D Schneider Dominik T DT Malkin David D Dehner Louis P LP Messinger Yoav H YH Hill D Ashley DA

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20180117 10

Pathogenic germline DICER1 variants cause a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome with a variety of manifestations. In addition to conferring increased cancer risks for pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) and ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, particularly Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, individuals with pathogenic germline DICER1 variants may also develop lung cysts, cystic nephroma, renal sarcoma and Wilms tumor, nodular hyperplasia of the thyroid, nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, cil ...[more]

PMID: 29343557

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeDICER1 syndrome is an autosomal-dominant, pleiotropic tumor-predisposition disorder caused by pathogenic germline variants in DICER1. We sought to quantify risk, hazard rates, and the probability of neoplasm incidence accounting for competing risks ("cumulative incidence") of neoplasms (benign and malignant) and standardized incidence ratios for malignant tumors in individuals with DICER1 pathogenic variation.Patients and methodsWe combined data from three large cohorts of patients who carry germline pathogenic variation in DICER1. To reduce ascertainment bias, we distinguished probands from nonprobands. Neoplasm diagnoses were confirmed by review of pathology reports and/or central review of surgical pathology materials. Standardized cancer incidence ratios were determined relative to the SEER program, which does not capture all DICER1-associated neoplasms. For all malignancies and benign tumors ("neoplasms," excluding type Ir pleuropulmonary blastoma and thyroid nodules), we used the Kaplan-Meier method and nonparametric cumulative incidence curves to estimate neoplasm-free survival.ResultsWe calculated the age at first neoplasm diagnosis (systematically ascertained cancers plus DICER1-associated neoplasms pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, and nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma) in 102 female and male nonproband DICER1 carriers. By age 10 years, 5.3% (95% CI, 0.6% to 9.7%) of nonproband DICER1 carriers had developed a neoplasm (females, 4.0%; males, 6.6%). By age 50 years, 19.3% (95% CI, 8.4% to 29.0%) of nonprobands had developed a neoplasm (females, 26.5%; males, 10.2%). After age 10 years, female risk was elevated compared with male risk. Standardized cancer incidence ratio analysis of 102 nonproband DICER1 carriers, which represented 3,344 person-years of observation, showed significant cancer excesses overall, particularly of gynecologic and thyroid cancers.ConclusionThis work provides the first quantitative analysis of site-specific neoplasm risk and excess malignancy risk in 102 systematically characterized nonproband DICER1 carriers. Our findings inform DICER1 syndrome phenotype, natural history, and genetic counseling.

Project description:BackgroundFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) affects more than one million Americans, and most individuals have not been formally diagnosed with the condition. Individuals with FH have markedly elevated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from birth that substantially increase their risk for early-onset cardiovascular (CV) events. Guideline-recommended treatments exist to lower LDL-C and reduce the risk of CV events in individuals with FH and hypercholesterolemia. This study seeks to address a significant gap in the care of individuals with FH by systematically developing an effective approach to increase the adoption of guideline-recommended treatments for FH.MethodsThis developmental study will consist of three aims: 1) determine the barriers to and facilitators of treatment of FH; 2) develop a list of potential implementation strategies to promote the adoption of guideline-recommended treatment of individuals with FH, and 3) pilot one implementation strategy from Aim 2 in one health care system to evaluate implementation outcomes of the strategy. The Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model will guide this project, including the development of interview questions, implementation strategies, and evaluation of the implementation strategy. The implementation outcomes include: of individuals targeted by the implementation strategy, how many are impacted by it (reach), measure the change in knowledge, attitude, and behavior that is impacted by the implementation strategy (effectiveness), in settings targeted by the implementation strategy, how many adopt it (adoption), and fidelity and cost of the implementation strategy (implementation). Data sources will include electronic health records, administrative databases, surveys, and semi-structured interviews.DiscussionThe inclusion of patient and organizational stakeholder experiences is a critically important step in developing efficient and effective implementation strategies. Additionally, perspectives from a variety of geographic areas and cultural perspectives should increase feasibility and fidelity of the interventional approach to improve adoption of guideline-recommended practices for FH care.

Project description:In high-risk individuals participating in a pancreatic cancer surveillance program, worrisome features warrant for intensified surveillance or, occasionally, surgery. Our objectives were to determine the patient-reported burden of intensified surveillance and/or surgery, and to assess post-operative quality of life and opinion of surgery. Participants in our pancreatic cancer surveillance program completed questionnaires including the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). For individuals who underwent intensified surveillance, questionnaires before, during, and???3 weeks after were analyzed. In addition, subjects who underwent intensified surveillance in the past 3 years or underwent surgery at any time, were invited for an interview, that included the Short-Form 12 (SF-12). A total of 31 high-risk individuals were studied. During the intensified surveillance period, median CWS scores were higher (14, IQR 7), as compared to before (12, IQR 9, P?=?0.007) and after (11, IQR 7, P?=?0.014), but eventually returned back to baseline (P?=?0.823). Median HADS scores were low: 5 (IQR 6) for anxiety and 3 (IQR 5) for depression, and they were unaffected by the intensified surveillance period. Of the 10 operated patients, 1 (10%) developed diabetes and 7 (70%) pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. The interviews yielded median quality-of-life scores comparable to the general population. Also, after surgery, patients' attitudes towards surveillance were unchanged (5/10, 50%) or became more positive (4/10, 40%). Although patients were aware of the (sometimes benign) pathological outcome, when asked if surgery had been justified, only 20% (2/10) disagreed, and all would again have chosen to undergo surgery. In conclusion, in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer, intensified surveillance temporarily increased cancer worries, without affecting general anxiety or depression. Although pancreatic surgery led to substantial co-morbidity, quality of life was similar to the general population, and surgery did not negatively affect the attitude towards surveillance.

Dataset Information

DICER1 and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies.

Publications

<i>DICER1</i> and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets