Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?


ABSTRACT:

Background

Health-related apps have great potential to enhance health and prevent disease globally, but their quality currently varies too much for clinicians to feel confident about recommending them to patients. The major quality concerns are dubious app content, loss of privacy associated with widespread sharing of the patient data they capture, inaccurate advice or risk estimates and the paucity of impact studies. This may explain why current evidence about app use by people with health-related conditions is scanty and inconsistent.

Main text

There are many concerns about health-related apps designed for use by patients, such as poor regulation and implicit trust in technology. However, there are several actions that various stakeholders, including users, developers, health professionals and app distributors, can take to tackle these concerns and thus improve app quality. This article focuses on the use of checklists that can be applied to apps, novel evaluation methods and suggestions for how clinical specialty organisations can develop a low-cost curated app repository with explicit risk and quality criteria.

Conclusions

Clinicians and professional societies must act now to ensure they are using good quality apps, support patients in choosing between available apps and improve the quality of apps under development. Funders must also invest in research to answer important questions about apps, such as how clinicians and patients decide which apps to use and which app factors are associated with effectiveness.

SUBMITTER: Wyatt JC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6276222 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?

Wyatt Jeremy C JC  

BMC medicine 20181203 1


<h4>Background</h4>Health-related apps have great potential to enhance health and prevent disease globally, but their quality currently varies too much for clinicians to feel confident about recommending them to patients. The major quality concerns are dubious app content, loss of privacy associated with widespread sharing of the patient data they capture, inaccurate advice or risk estimates and the paucity of impact studies. This may explain why current evidence about app use by people with hea  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4774995 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4464901 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4175642 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6377290 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7015697 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6302393 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2928073 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4000327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8785715 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5522972 | biostudies-other