Estimating pediatric general anesthesia exposure: Quantifying duration and risk.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bartels DD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6291204 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Estimating pediatric general anesthesia exposure: Quantifying duration and risk.
Bartels Devan Darby DD McCann Mary Ellen ME Davidson Andrew J AJ Polaner David M DM Whitlock Elizabeth L EL Bateman Brian T BT
Paediatric anaesthesia 20180502 6
<h4>Introduction</h4>Understanding the duration of pediatric general anesthesia exposure in contemporary practice is important for identifying groups at risk for long general anesthesia exposures and designing trials examining associations between general anesthesia exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis to estimate pediatric general anesthesia exposure duration during 2010-2015 using the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registr ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Pediatric patients with cancer undergo repeated painful procedures, including bone marrow aspirations and biopsies (BMABs). Optimal management of procedure-related pain can reduce discomfort, anxiety, and distress. Children with neuroblastoma were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 arms on a prospective, single-blind, crossover trial conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from October 2016 to January 2018 (www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02924324). Participants underwent 2 sequential BMABs: one with general anesthesia (GA) alone, the other with GA plus local anesthesia (LA) (GA + LA). The objective was to assess procedure-related pain and its interference with quality of life (QoL) with GA versus GA + LA. Primary outcome was percentage of participants requiring postprocedural opioids. Secondary outcomes were total opioid and nonopioid analgesics, pain scores, time to first analgesic, QoL, and toxicity. Management of postprocedural pain was standardized. Of 56 participants randomly assigned (3-16.5 years old), 46 completed both procedures. There was no significant difference in percentage of participants requiring opioids with GA versus GA + LA (24% vs 20%, P = .5). Pain scores in the recovery room were significantly lower for GA + LA versus GA (median [IQR]: 0 [0-2] vs 2 [0-4], P = .002). There were no statistically significant differences in total opioid or nonopioid analgesic, 6- and 24-hour pain scores, median time to first analgesic, or pain interference. No adverse events occurred. LA was associated with significant improvement in pain scores in the immediate recovery period. LA did not reduce postprocedural opioid use, nor did it improve QoL for patients undergoing BMAB with GA.
| S-EPMC6855828 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The association between exposure to general anesthesia and dementia risk has been inconsistently reported across epidemiological studies. To better understand the association, we conducted a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. PubMed and Embase were searched through April 2017. Random-effects models were used to pool association estimates. We further evaluated potential dose-response relationship. Based on literature search, seven prospective/cohort studies, 11 case-control studies, and a pooled analysis of six case-control studies were identified. Sixteen of these studies were with high quality. After pooling available risk estimates, overall no significant association between exposure to general anesthesia (yes versus no) and dementia risk was detected (odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.19, p for heterogeneity < 0.001). The null association persisted in the majority of subgroup analyses, although a significant positive association was detected in studies collecting anesthesia exposure using records (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.47, p for heterogeneity < 0.001), a method that is less prone to bias compared with interview or questionnaire using proxy reporters. Based on the dose-response analysis of three studies, a significant nonlinear relationship between times of exposure to general anesthesia and increased risk of dementia was suggested (p < 0.0001). Overall, this meta-analysis suggests that overall the evidence from epidemiological studies supporting a link between general anesthesia exposure and an increased dementia risk is not very strong, while an association was suggested in the studies collecting anesthesia exposure using records and those providing anesthesia exposure frequency data. Further well-designed studies are warranted to better characterize the relationship of interest.
| S-EPMC5601762 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background/objectivesCognitive changes are commonly observed in older adults following surgical procedures. There are concerns that exposure to general anesthesia (GA) may contribute to an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. Our study examined the associations between exposure to GA compared with regional anesthesia (RA) administered for elective surgical procedures and the development of dementia.DesignPopulation-based propensity matched retrospective cohort study.SettingLinked administrative databases were accessed from ICES (formerly called the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services) in Ontario, Canada.ParticipantsWe included all community-dwelling individuals aged 66 and older who underwent one of five elective surgical procedures in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2007, and March 31, 2011. Individuals with evidence of dementia preceding cohort entry were excluded. Individuals who received GA were matched within surgical procedures to those who received RA on age, sex, cohort entry year, and a propensity score to control for potential confounders.MeasurementsThe baseline characteristics of the study sample were compared before and after matching. Individuals were followed for up to 5 years following cohort entry for the occurrence of dementia using a validated algorithm. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between anesthetic type and dementia. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken.ResultsA total of 7,499 matched pairs were included in the final analysis. Overall, no difference was observed in the risk of being diagnosed with dementia for individuals who received GA when compared with RA (HR = 1.0; 95% CI = .8-1.2). There was also no association between anesthesia and dementia in most subgroup and sensitivity analyses.ConclusionElective surgery using GA was not associated with an overall elevated risk of dementia when compared with RA. Future studies are required to determine whether surgery is a risk factor for dementia irrespective of anesthetic technique.
| S-EPMC7942805 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is common among older adults and leads to significant disability. Volatile anesthetic gases administered during general anesthesia (GA) have been hypothesized to be a risk factor for the development of AD. The objective of this study is to systematically review the association between exposure to GA and risk of AD.MethodsWe searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Google scholar for observational studies examining the association between exposure to GA and risk of AD. We examined study quality using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa risk of bias assessment for observational studies. We used standard meta-analytic techniques to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken to evaluate the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 15 case-control studies were included in the review. No cohort studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. There was variation in the methodological quality of included studies. There was no significant association between any exposure to GA and risk of AD (pooled OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.93 - 1.19, Z = 0.80, p = 0.43). There was also no significant association between GA and risk of AD in several subgroup and sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsA history of exposure to GA is not associated with an increased risk of AD although there are few high-quality studies in this area. Prospective cohort studies with long-term follow-up or randomized controlled trials are required to further understand the association between GA and AD.
| S-EPMC3258207 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is important to estimate the duration-distance relation in cycle commuting in the general population since this enables analyses of the potential for various public health outcomes. Therefore, the aim is to estimate this relation in the Swedish adult population of 2015. For that purpose, the first step was to establishit for adult male and female cycle commuters in Greater Stockholm, Sweden. Whether or not the slopes of these relations needed to be altered in order to make them representative of the general population was evaluated by comparing the levels of maximal oxygen uptake in samples of commuter cyclists and the population. The measure used was the maximal oxygen uptake divided by both the body weight and a cycle weight of 18.5 kg. The body weights in the population samples were adjusted to mirror relevant levels in 2015. Age adjustments for the duration-distance relations were calculated on the basis of the maximal oxygen uptake in the population samples aged 20-65 years. The duration-distance relations of the cycle commuters were downscaled by about 24-28% to mirror levels in the general population. The empirical formula for the distance (D, km) was based on duration (T, minutes) · speed (km/min) · a correction factor from cycle commuter to the general population · age adjustment (A, years). For the males in the general population the formula was: D = T · 20.76 km/h · 0.719 · (1.676-0.0147 · A). For females, the formula was: D = T · 16.14 km/h · 0.763 · (1.604-0.0129 · A). These formulas, combined with distributions of route distances between home and work in the population, enable realistic evaluations of the potential for different public health outcomes through cycle commuting.
| S-EPMC6239310 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Prenatal exposure to anesthetics has raised increasing attention about the neuronal development in offspring. Animal models are usually used for investigation. As a new drug, esketamine is the s-isoform of ketamine and is twice as potent as the racemic ketamine with less reported adverse effects. Esketamine is currently being used and become more favorable in clinical anesthesia work, including surgeries during pregnancy, yet the effect on the offspring is unknown. The present study aimed to elucidate the effects of gestational administration of esketamine on neuronal development in offspring, using a rat model. Gestational day 14.5 pregnant rats received intravenous injections of esketamine. The postnatal day 0 (P0) hippocampus was digested and cultured in vitro to display the neuronal growth morphology. On Day 4 the in vitro experiments revealed a shorter axon length and fewer dendrite branches in the esketamine group. The results from the EdU- imaging kit showed decreased proliferative capacity in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and dentate gyrus (DG) in both P0 and P30 offspring brains in the esketamine group. Moreover, neurogenesis, neuron maturity and spine density were impaired, resulting in attenuated long-term potentiation (LTP). Compromised hippocampal function accounted for the deficits in neuronal cognition, memory and emotion. The evidence obtained suggests that the neurobehavioral deficit due to prenatal exposure to esketamine may be related to the decrease phosphorylation of CREB and abnormalities in N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor subunits. Taken together, these results demonstrate the negative effect of prenatal esketamine exposure on neuronal development in offspring rats. G14.5 esketamine administration influenced the neurobehavior of the offspring in adolescence. Poorer neuronal growth and reduced brain proliferative capacity in late gestation and juvenile pups resulted in impaired P30 neuronal plasticity and synaptic spines as well as abnormalities in NMDAR subunits. Attenuated LTP reflected compromised hippocampal function, as confirmed by behavioral tests of cognition, memory and emotions. This figure was completed on the website of Figdraw.
| S-EPMC10333374 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeManaging pediatric patients requiring daily general anesthesia (GA) for radiation therapy (RT) in the setting of COVID-19 is complex, owing to the aerosolizing nature of GA procedures, the risk of cardiopulmonary complications for infected patients, and the treatment of immunocompromised oncology patients in a busy, densely populated radiation oncology clinic.Methods and materialsWe developed an institutional protocol to define procedures for COVID-19 testing and protection of patients, caregivers, and staff, hypothesizing that this protocol would allow patients requiring GA to be safely treated, minimizing COVID-19 transmission risk to both patients and staff, and at the same time maintaining pre-COVID-19 patient volumes. All patients underwent COVID-19 testing before their first treatment and thrice weekly during treatment. For patients who tested positive for COVID-19, RT was delivered in the last end-of-day treatment appointment. A negative pressure room was used for GA induction and recovery, and separate physician/nurse teams were designated for in-room versus out-of-room patient management.ResultsSeventy-eight pediatric patients received RT under GA, versus 69 over the same prior year timeframe, and 2 patients received 2 courses of RT under GA, for a total of 80 courses. The mean age was 4.9 years (range, 0.5-19.0 years) and 41 of 78 (52.6%) were male. Two patients (2.6%) received 2 courses of RT under GA, establishing a total of 80 courses. The mean number of treatment fractions was 22.2 (range, 1-40). Two of 78 patients (2.6%) tested positive for COVID-19; both were asymptomatic. Both patients completed treatment as prescribed. Neither patient developed cardiopulmonary symptoms complicating anesthesia, and neither patient experienced grade 3+ acute radiation toxicity.ConclusionsWith careful multidisciplinary planning to mitigate COVID-19 risk, pediatric RT with GA was carried out for a large patient volume without widespread infection and without increased toxic effects from either GA or RT.
| S-EPMC8898088 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Surgical stress has been shown to result in immune disturbance. Neuraxial anesthesia (NA) has long been hypothesized to blunt undesired surgical insults and thus limit immune compromise and improve surgical outcomes. We hypothesized that NA would decrease postoperative infectious complications compared with general anesthesia (GA) among knee arthroplasty patients.We studied the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2010. There were 16,555 patients included in our final cohort, with 9167 patients receiving GA and 7388 patients receiving spinal or epidural anesthesia.. Outcomes of interest included infection-related 30-day postoperative complications, including surgical site-related infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis, septic shock, and a composite end point of any systemic infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test for effect of anesthesia type while adjusting for the influence of preexisting comorbidities.The overall mortality was 0.24% and 0.15% among NA and GA subjects, respectively (P = 0.214). NA subjects had fewer unadjusted incidences of pneumonia (P = 0.035) and composite systemic infection (P = 0.006). After risk adjustment for preexisting comorbidities, NA was associated with lower odds of pneumonia (odds ratio = 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.90]) and lower odds of composite systemic infection (odds ratio = 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.92]).Our study suggested that NA was associated with lower adjusted odds of both pneumonia and a composite outcome of any systemic infectious complication within 30 days of surgery compared with GA.
| S-EPMC3800057 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo study the association between exposure to procedures performed under general anesthesia before age 2 years and development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Patients and methodsStudy patients included all children born between January 1, 1976, and December 31, 1982, in Rochester, MN, who remained in Rochester after age 5. Cases of ADHD diagnosed before age 19 years were identified by applying stringent research criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed exposure to procedures requiring general anesthesia (none, 1, 2 or more) as a predictor of ADHD using a stratified analysis with strata based on a propensity score including comorbid health conditions.ResultsAmong the 5357 children analyzed, 341 ADHD cases were identified (estimated cumulative incidence, 7.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8%-8.4%). For children with no postnatal exposure to procedures requiring anesthesia before the age of 2 years, the cumulative incidence of ADHD at age 19 years was 7.3% (95% CI, 6.5%-8.1%). For single and 2 or more exposures, the estimates were 10.7% ( 95% CI, 6.8%-14.4%) and 17.9% ( 95% CI, 7.2%-27.4%), respectively. After adjusting for gestational age, sex, birth weight, and comorbid health conditions, exposure to multiple (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.03-3.71), but not single (hazard ratio,1.18; 95% CI, 0.79-1.77), procedures requiring general anesthesia was associated with an increased risk for ADHD.ConclusionChildren repeatedly exposed to procedures requiring general anesthesia before age 2 years are at increased risk for the later development of ADHD even after adjusting for comorbidities.
| S-EPMC3538403 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe optimal type of anesthesia for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the influence of anesthetic management on the outcomes in VBAO patients received endovascular treatment (EVT).MethodsPatients underwent EVT for acute VBAO at 21 stroke centers in China were retrospectively enrolled and compared between the general anesthesia (GA) group and non-GA group. The primary outcome was the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (90-day mRS score 0-2), and the rate of successful reperfusion. The safety outcomes included all-cause mortality at 90 days, the occurrence of any procedural complication, and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). In addition, we performed analyses of the outcomes in subgroups that were defined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (≤8 or >8).ResultsIn the propensity score matched cohort, there were no difference in the primary outcome, secondary outcomes and safety outcomes between the two groups. Among patients with a GCS score of 8 or less, the proportion of successful reperfusion was significantly higher in the GA group than the non-GA group (aOR, 3.57, 95% CI 1.06-12.50, p = 0.04). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting-propensity score-adjusted cohort, similar results were found.ConclusionsPatients placed under GA during EVT for VBAO appear to be as effective and safe as non-GA. Furthermore, GA might yield better successful reperfusion for worse presenting GCS score (≤8).RegistrationURL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2000033211.
| S-EPMC9932259 | biostudies-literature