Dataset Information

Nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in patients with primary tracheal tumors: a large population-based analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The aim of this study was to develop and validate reliable nomograms to predict individual overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with primary tracheal tumors and further estimate the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for these entities.

Patients and methods

A total of 405 eligible patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. All of them were randomly divided into training (n=303) and validation (n=102) sets. For the purpose of establishing nomograms, the Akaike information criterion was employed to select significant prognostic factors in multivariate Cox regression models. Both internal and external validations of the nomograms were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to reduce the influence of selection bias between the PORT group and the non-PORT group.

Results

Two nomograms shared common variables including age at diagnosis, histology, N and M stages, tumor size, and treatment types, while gender was only incorporated in the CSS nomogram. The C-indices of OS and CSS nomograms were 0.817 and 0.813, displaying considerable predictive accuracy. The calibration curves indicated consistency between the nomograms and the actual observations. When the nomograms were applied to the validation set, the results remained reconcilable. Moreover, the nomograms showed superiority over the Bhattacharyya's staging system with regard to the C-indices. After PSM, PORT was not associated with significantly better OS or CSS. Only squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients in the PORT group had improved OS compared to non-PORT group.

Conclusion

The first two nomograms for predicting survival in patients with primary tracheal tumors were proposed in the present study. PORT seems to improve the prognosis of SCC patients, which needs further exploration.

SUBMITTER: Wen J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6294060 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in patients with primary tracheal tumors: a large population-based analysis.

Wen Junmiao J Liu Di D Xu Xinyan X Chen Donglai D Chen Yongbing Y Sun Liang L Chen Jiayan J Fan Min M

Cancer management and research 20181211

<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this study was to develop and validate reliable nomograms to predict individual overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with primary tracheal tumors and further estimate the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for these entities.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>A total of 405 eligible patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. All of them were randomly divided ...[more]

PMID: 30588090

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis study identified the risk factors for survival in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Nomograms were developed and validated to predict individualized overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in this particular cohort.MethodsPatients diagnosed with PCNSL between 1975 and 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for this study. The Cox regression model, the Fine and Grey's model, and the backward method were applied to determine the risk factors for OS and CSS. Nomograms were established accordingly. Internal and external validation was performed in an Asian population to examine the accuracy of the nomograms.ResultsA total of 5,900 patients with PCNSL were identified from the SEER database. A further 163 patients with PCNSL from the Beijing Tiantan Hospital between 2004 and 2018 were included. Age at diagnosis, tumor site, pathological subtype, surgery, chemotherapy, coexisting malignancies, and HIV infection were independent risk factors of CSS. In addition to the risk factors of CSS, gender, marital status, and radiation were also independent factors of OS. Nomograms were developed to estimate the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS. The discrimination and calibration of the nomograms performed well. The C-indexes of the nomograms for OS and CSS prediction were 0.728 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.703-0.753] and 0.726 (95% CI: 0.696-0.756), respectively. In addition, compared with previously published OS nomograms, the newly established nomograms displayed superior prediction for OS.ConclusionsNomograms predicting the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and CSS of patients with PCNSL were established in this study. The validated nomograms showed relatively good performance and may be used clinically to evaluate patients' individualized risk and prognosis with PCNSL. Free software for individualized survival prediction is provided at http://www.pcnsl-survivalprediction.cn.

Project description:Objective:Klatskin tumors are rare, malignant tumors of the biliary system with a poor prognosis for patient survival. The current understanding of these tumors is limited to a small number of case reports or case series; therefore, we examined prognostic factors of this disease. Methods:A population cohort study was conducted in patients selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with a Klatskin tumor that was histologically diagnosed between 2004 to 2014. Propensity-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the overall survival (OS) among those with a Klatskin tumor (KCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The nomogram was based on 317 eligible Klatskin tumor patients and its predictive accuracy and discriminatory ability were determined using the concordance index (C-index). Results:Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with Klatskin tumors had significantly worse overall survival rates (1-year OS = 26.2%, 2-year OS = 10.7%, 3-year OS = 3.4%) than those with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (1-year OS = 62.2%, 2-year OS = 36.4%, 3-year OS = 19.1%, p < 0.001) or hepatocellular carcinoma (1-year OS = 72.4% , 2-year OS = 48.5%, 3-year OS = 36.2%, p < 0.001). A poor prognosis was also significantly associated with older age, higher grade, SEER historic stage, and lymph node metastasis. Local destruction of the tumor (HR = 0.635, 95% CI [0.421-0.956], p = 0.03) and surgery (HR = 0.434, 95% [CI 0.328-0.574], p < 0.001) were independent protective factors. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that older age, SEER historic stage, and lymph node metastases (HR = 1.468, 95% CI [1.008-2.139], p = 0.046) were independent prognostic factors of poor survival rates in Klatskin tumor patients, while cancer-directed surgery was an independent protective factor (HR = 0.555, 95% CI [0.316-0.977], p = 0.041). The prognostic and protective factors were included in the nomogram (C-index for survival = 0.651; 95% CI [0.607-0.695]). Conclusions:The Klatskin tumor group had poorer rates of OS and cancer-specific survival than the ICCA and HCC groups. Early detection and diagnosis were associated with a higher rate of OS in Klatskin tumor patients.

Project description:Background For patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), conventional TNM staging is not accurate in predicting survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop two accurate survival prediction models to guide clinical decision making. Methods A retrospective analysis of 22,842 LABC patients was performed from 2010 to 2015 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. An additional cohort of 200 patients from the Binzhou Medical University Hospital (BMUH) was analyzed. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to screen for variables. The identified variables were used to build a survival prediction model. The performance of the nomogram models was assessed based on the concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results The LASSO analysis identified 9 variables in patients with LABC, including age, marital status, Grade, histological type, T-stage, N-stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram in predicting the overall survival (OS) was 0.767 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.751–0.775], cancer specific survival (CSS) was 0.765 (95% CI: 0.756–0.774). In the external validation cohort, the C-index of the nomogram in predicting the OS was 0.858 (95% CI: 0.812–0.904), the CSS was 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817–0.915). In the training cohort, the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) values of the nomogram in prediction of the 1, 3, and 5-year OS were 0.836 (95% CI: 0.821–0.851), 0.769 (95% CI: 0.759–0.780), and 0.750 (95% CI: 0.738–0.762), respectively. The AUC values for prediction of the 1, 3, and 5-year CSS were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.811–0.847), 0.769 (95% CI: 0.757–0.780), and 0.745 (95% CI: 0.732–0.758), respectively. Results of the C-index, ROC curve, and DCA demonstrated that the nomogram was more accurate in predicting the OS and CSS of patients compared with conventional TNM staging. Conclusion Two prediction models were developed and validated in this study which provided more accurate prediction of the OS and CSS in LABC patients than the TNM staging. The constructed models can be used for predicting survival outcomes and guide treatment plans for LABC patients.

Project description:BackgroundTo develop and validate survival nomograms for predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients.MethodPatients diagnosed with UTUC from 2010 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes were respectively collected from the included patients. Then, eligible patients were divided into the training cohort and the validation cohort. Additionally, survival nomograms were developed based on the results of multivariate Cox analysis in the training cohort. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were generated to assess the actual effect of each variable. Lastly, the nomograms were validated using the concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curves.ResultsTotally, 3,556 patients were included, with 2,492 in the training cohort and 1,064 in the validation cohort. No significant differences were detected in comparisons in clinical characteristics between two cohorts. Based on the results of uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis, seven factors (age, TNM stage, use of surgery/radiation and marital status) for OS and six factors (age, TNM stage and use of surgery/radiation) for CSS were selected to develop the survival nomograms. The C-index for OS and CSS was 0.763 and 0.793 in the training cohort, and 0.759 and 0.784 in the validation cohort. Additionally, the 3- and 5-year AUCs for OS were 0.808 and 0.780 in the training cohort, and 0.785 and 0.778 in the validation group. As for CSS, it was 0.833 and 0.803 in the training cohort, and 0.815 and 0.810 in the validation cohort. Lastly, the calibration curves indicated a good consistency between the actual survival and the predictive survival.ConclusionsIt was the first time to conduct survival models for UTUC patients with predictive performance. It might be valuable of clinical application and further exploration with more studies in the future.

Dataset Information

Nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in patients with primary tracheal tumors: a large population-based analysis.

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in patients with primary tracheal tumors: a large population-based analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets