Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin 6 for blood culture positivity in general ICU patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wu Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6296063 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin 6 for blood culture positivity in general ICU patients.
Wu Qin Q Yang Hao H Kang Yan Y
Critical care (London, England) 20181217 1
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6173871 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveGram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs), especially those caused by antibiotic-resistant species, have become a public health challenge. Procalcitonin (PCT) showed promising potential in early diagnosis of GNBSI; however, little was known about its performance under different clinical settings. We here systematically assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCT in recognizing GNBSI and made direct comparisons with C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6).MethodsPubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 15th, 2019. Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model was used for the investigation of heterogeneity and for comparisons between markers.Results25 studies incorporating 50933 suspected BSI episodes were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for PCT were 0.71 and 0.76, respectively. The overall AUC was 0.80. The lowest AUCs were found in patients with febrile neutropenia (0.69) and hematological malignancy (0.69). The highest AUC was found in groups using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (0.87). In direct comparisons, PCT showed better overall performance than CRP with the AUC being 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.87) for PCT and 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.81) for CRP, but the relative DORs varied with thresholds between PCT and CRP (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found either in threshold (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found either in threshold (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found either in threshold (.ConclusionsPCT was helpful in recognizing GNBSI, but the test results should be interpreted carefully with knowledge of patients' medical condition and should not serve as the only criterion for GNBSI. Further prospective studies are warranted for comparisons between different clinical settings.
| S-EPMC7008263 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimWe aimed to perform a meta-analysis to find out whether PCT and MDW could be used as accurate diagnostic markers for sepsis.MethodsWe searched PUBMED, WOS, and SCOPUS databases. Inclusion criteria were any observational or clinical trials that compared monocyte Distribution Width [MDW] with Procalcitonin [PCT] as diagnostic markers in a patient with sepsis. Case reports, editorials, conference abstracts, and animal studies were excluded. RevMan software [5.4] was used to perform the meta-analysis.ResultsAfter the complete screening, 5 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of patients included in the meta-analysis in the sepsis group is 565 and 781 in the control group. The pooled analysis between the sepsis group and controls showed a statistically significant association between sepsis and increased levels of MDW and PCT [MD = 3.94, 95% CI = 2.53 to 5.36, p-value < 0.00001] and [MD = 9.29, 95% CI = 0.67 to 17.91, p-value = 0.03] respectively. Moreover, the subgroup analysis showed that the p-value of MDW levels [< 0.00001] is more significant than the p-value of PCT levels = 0.03, the p-value between the two subgroups [< 0.00001]. Additionally, the overall ROC Area for MDW [0.790] > the overall ROC Area for PCT [0.760].ConclusionOur study revealed a statistically significant association between sepsis and increased MDW and PCT levels compared with controls and the overall ROC Area for MDW is higher than the overall ROC Area for PCT, indicating that the diagnostic accuracy of MDW is higher than PCT.MDW can be used as a diagnostic marker for sepsis patients in the emergency department. More multicenter studies are needed to support our findings.
| S-EPMC10399732 | biostudies-literature
Project description:C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin (PCT) alone has limitations in the early detection of infection or inflammation due to shortcomings in specificity and varied cut-off values. Recently, interleukin (IL)-6 has been assessed, but it is not known to what extent the three values are homogeneous in reality. This retrospective study was conducted with two large datasets (discrepancy set with results within 24 h of admission [7149 patients] and follow-up set until 2 weeks of hospital stay [5261 tests]) consisting of simultaneous examinations of CRP, PCT, and IL-6 between January 2015 and August 2021. The specific discrepant group (n = 102, 1.4%) with normal CRP (<10 mg/L) and PCT (<0.1 ng/mL) and high IL-6 (≥100 pg/mL) values was extracted from the discrepancy set. Dimensionality reduction and visualization were performed using Python. The three markers were not clearly clustered after t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding. Pearson's correlation coefficients between two markers were substantially low (0.23-0.55). Among the high normalized IL-6 levels (≥0.5) (n = 349), 17.8% and 38.7% of CRP and PCT levels were very low (≤0.01). 9.2% and 13.4% of normal CRP (n = 1522) had high PCT (≥0.5 ng/mL) and IL-6 (≥100 pg/mL) values, respectively. Infection and bacteremia among 102 patients occurred in 36 (35.3%) and 9 (8.8%) patients, respectively. In patients with bacteremia, IL-6 was the first to increase, followed by PCT and CRP. Our study revealed that CRP, PCT, and IL-6 levels were considerably discrepant, which could be misinterpreted if only CRP tests are performed.
| S-EPMC9783053 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEarly recognition is a key factor to achieve improved outcomes for septic patients. Combinations of biomarkers, as opposed to single ones, may improve timely diagnosis and survival. We investigated the performance characteristics of sepsis biomarkers, alone and in combination, for diagnosis of verified bacterial sepsis using Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria, respectively.MethodsProcalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate were determined in a total of 1,572 episodes of adult patients admitted to the emergency department on suspicion of sepsis. All sampling were performed prior to antibiotic administration. Discriminant analysis was used to construct two composite biomarkers consisting of linear combinations of the investigated biomarkers, one including three selected biomarkers (i.e., NLCR, CRP, and lactate), and another including all four (i.e., PCT, NLCR, CRP, and lactate). The diagnostic performances of the composite biomarkers as well as the individual biomarkers were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsFor diagnosis of bacterial sepsis based on Sepsis-3 criteria, the AUC for PCT (0.68; 95% CI 0.65-0.71) was comparable to the AUCs for the both composite biomarkers. Using the Sepsis-2 criteria for bacterial sepsis diagnosis, the AUC for the NLCR (0.68; 95% CI 0.65-0.71) but not for the other single biomarkers, was equal to the AUCs for the both composite biomarkers. For diagnosis of severe bacterial sepsis or septic shock based on the Sepsis-2 criteria, the AUCs for both composite biomarkers were significantly greater than those of the single biomarkers (0.85; 95% CI 0.82-0.88 for the composite three-biomarker, and 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.89 for the composite four-biomarker).ConclusionsCombinations of biomarkers can improve the diagnosis of verified bacterial sepsis in the most critically ill patients, but in less severe septic conditions either the NLCR or PCT alone exhibit equivalent performance.
| S-EPMC5519182 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a leading bacterial infection in the emergency department (ED). Diagnosing UTIs in the ED can be challenging due to the heterogeneous presentation; therefore, fast and precise tests are needed. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic precision of procalcitonin (PCT), soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptors (suPARs), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in diagnosing UTIs, grading the severity of UTIs, and ruling out bacteremia. Methods: We recruited adults admitted to three Danish EDs with suspected UTIs. PCT, suPAR, and CRP were used in index tests, while blood cultures, expert panel diagnosis, and severity grading were used in the reference tests. Logistic regression and area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCs) were utilized to evaluate the models and determine the optimal cut-offs. Results: We enrolled 229 patients. PCT diagnosed UTI with an AUROC of 0.612, detected severe disease with an AUROC of 0.712, and ruled out bacteremia with an AUROC of 0.777. SuPAR had AUROCs of 0.480, 0.638, and 0.605, while CRP had AUROCs of 0.599, 0.778, and 0.646. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of PCT, suPAR, or CRP for UTIs or to rule out severe disease was poor. However, PCT can safely rule out bacteremia in clinically relevant numbers in ED patients suspected of UTI.
| S-EPMC10971365 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRespiratory tract infection (RTI) is one of the most common diseases worldwide, and its incidence is rising year by year due to environmental pollution. Sputum culture remains the gold standard for RTI diagnosis, but its performance is limited by difficulties related to the sampling and testing of the sputum specimens. Heparin-binding protein (HBP), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reaction protein (CRP) are Inflammatory markers. They have the advantage of being fast, accurate and reproducible, but limited by their sensitivity and specificity. We explored the clinical value of the combined detection of them in the diagnosis of bacterial RTIs.MethodsPatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected as the case group, healthy age- and sex-matched subjects were enrolled as a control group. The subjects' HBP, PCT, and CRP levels were detected. The case group was further divided into two groups according to the bacterial culture results, and the differences in the markers were statistically analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn, and the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were calculated to analyze the diagnostic values of each marker and their combination in parallel for bacterial RTIs.ResultsThe plasma HBP, PCT, and CRP levels of patients in the bacterial and non-bacterial infection groups were significantly higher than those of patients in the healthy control group, and were positively correlated to the severity of the disease. for HBP with an AUC of 0.785 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.686-0.884], a sensitivity of 0.821, a specificity of 0.771; PCT with an AUC of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.664-0.870), a sensitivity of 0.773, a specificity of 0.791, and CRP with an AUC of 0.748 (95% CI: 0.642-0.854), a sensitivity of 0.839, a specificity of 0.696 in the bacterial and non-bacterial infection groups. The combined detection of HBP + CRP had the optimal diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.797 (95% CI: 0.698-0.895; P<0.001), a sensitivity of 0.809, a specificity of 0.800.ConclusionsThe combined detection of HBP and CRP is valuable for diagnosing bacterial RTIs and may guide the development of reasonable treatment protocols in clinical settings.
| S-EPMC8987818 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNeutrophil CD64 is widely described as an accurate biomarker for the diagnosis of infection in patients with septic syndrome. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil CD64, comparing it with C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis of infection in adult patients with septic syndrome, based on sepsis-2 criteria. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases and Google Scholar. Original studies reporting the performance of neutrophil CD64 for sepsis diagnosis in adult patients were retained. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated.ResultsWe included 14 studies (2471 patients) from 2006 to 2017 in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of neutrophil CD64 for diagnosing infection in adult patients with septic syndrome were 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.92) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.93), respectively. The area under the SROC curve and the DOR were 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96) and 53 (95% CI 22-128), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies included. Subgroup analyses showed that this heterogeneity was due to differences in sample size and the proportions of patients with sepsis included in the studies. Six studies (927 patients) compared neutrophil CD64 and CRP determinations, and six studies (744 patients) compared neutrophil CD64 and PCT determinations. The area under the SROC curve was larger for neutrophil CD64 than for CRP (0.89 [95% CI 0.87-0.92] vs. 0.84 [95% CI 0.80-0.88], P < 0.05) or PCT (0.89 [95% CI 0.84-0.95] vs. 0.84 [95% CI 0.79-0.89], P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn adult patients with septic syndrome, neutrophil CD64 levels are an excellent biomarker with moderate accuracy outperforming both CRP and PCT determinations.
| S-EPMC6325056 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionProcalcitonin is a marker for bacterial diseases and has been used to guide antibiotic prescription. Procalcitonin accuracy, measured at admission, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), is unknown in the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin to assess the need for antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP presenting to the emergency department during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.MethodsWe performed a real-world diagnostic retrospective accuracy study of procalcitonin in patients admitted to the emergency department. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on procalcitonin results compared to the reference standard of combined microbiological and radiological analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under (AUC) the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated in two analyses: first assessing procalcitonin ability to differentiate microbiologically proven bacteria from viral CAP and then clinically diagnosed bacterial CAP from viral CAP.ResultsWhen using a procalcitonin threshold of 0.5 ng/mL to identify bacterial etiology within patients with CAP, we observed sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 64.1%, and 43% and 82.6%, respectively, in the two analyses. The positive and negative predictive values of a procalcitonin threshold of 0.5 ng/mL to identify patients for whom antibiotics should be advised were 46.4% and 79.7%, and 48.9% and 79% in the two analyses, respectively. The AUC for the two analyses was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.68) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69).ConclusionsProcalcitonin measured upon admission during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should not guide antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP.
| S-EPMC9495046 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requires prompt treatment, but its diagnosis is complex. Improvement of bacterial CAP diagnosis by biomarkers has been evaluated using chest X-ray infiltrate as the CAP gold standard, producing conflicting results. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers in suspected CAP adults visiting emergency departments for whom CAP diagnosis was established by an adjudication committee which founded its judgment on a systematic multidetector thoracic CT scan.MethodsIn an ancillary study of a multi-center prospective study evaluating the impact of systematic thoracic CT scan on CAP diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were evaluated. Systematic nasopharyngeal multiplex respiratory virus PCR was performed at inclusion. An adjudication committee classified CAP diagnostic probability on a 4-level Likert scale, based on all available data.ResultsTwo hundred patients with suspected CAP were analyzed. The adjudication committee classified 98 patients (49.0 %) as definite CAP, 8 (4.0 %) as probable, 23 (11.5 %) as possible and excluded in 71 (35.5 %, including 29 patients with pulmonary infiltrates on chest X-ray). Among patients with radiological pulmonary infiltrate, 23 % were finally classified as excluded. Viruses were identified by PCR in 29 % of patients classified as definite. Area under the curve was 0.787 [95 % confidence interval (95 % CI), 0.717 to 0.857] for CRP and 0.655 (95 % CI, 0.570 to 0.739) for PCT to detect definite CAP. CRP threshold at 50 mg/L resulted in a positive predictive value of 0.76 and a negative predictive value of 0.75. No PCT cut-off resulted in satisfactory positive or negative predictive values. CRP and PCT accuracy was not improved by exclusion of the 25 (25.5 %) definite viral CAP cases.ConclusionsFor patients with suspected CAP visiting emergency departments, diagnostic accuracy of CRP and PCT are insufficient to confirm the CAP diagnosis established using a gold standard that includes thoracic CT scan. Diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers is also insufficient to distinguish bacterial CAP from viral CAP.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registry NCT01574066 (February 7, 2012).
| S-EPMC4608327 | biostudies-literature