Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Rationale
Previous work has shown that some mouse strains (e.g., DBA/2J [D2]) readily develop robust ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) while others (e.g., C57BL/6J [B6]) do not. Though commonly interpreted as a difference between strains in sensitivity to ethanol reward, other explanations for this finding are possible.Objectives
To explore the hypothesis that variation in sensitivity to contextual cues underlies CPP differences, the present work investigated ethanol-induced CPP in D2 and B6 mice trained with a standard tactile (floor) cue procedure compared to mice trained with tactile plus visual-spatial cues.Methods
In an unbiased CPP procedure, mice were assigned to either a single element cue (one-compartment apparatus with tactile cue presente
SUBMITTER: Cunningham CL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6298874 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature