Dataset Information

MiRNA arm switching identifies novel tumour biomarkers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

microRNAs have been reported to play critical roles in cancer and to have potential as diagnostic biomarkers. During miRNA biogenesis, one strand of the miRNA hairpin precursor is preferentially selected as a functionally mature miRNA, while the other strand is typically degraded. Arm switching occurs when the strand preference is changed. This preference can be different and can change dynamically depending upon the species, tissue types, or development stages. Due to recent advances in next-generation sequencing methods, arm switching has been observed in a variety of cancers.

Methods

A tumour miRNA-Seq dataset was collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The support vector machine (SVM) method combined with 5-fold cross validation was applied to select the best combination of arm-switched miRNA tumour markers. Survival analysis was also applied to identify patient survival associated miRNA markers.

Findings

We observed 51 arm-switched miRNAs and of these, 7 were associated with patient survival. Twenty-three 1-combination arm switching miRNAs with excellent diagnostic value were identified. Interestingly, ovarian cancer showed a significant difference in arm switching pattern compared with 32 other cancers.

Interpretation

These results suggest that arm switching miRNAs could be used as potential biomarkers for various cancers. FUND: This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 61472158, 61572227), and University of Macau Faculty of Health Sciences (MYRG2016-00101-FHS).

SUBMITTER: Chen L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6306400 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

miRNA arm switching identifies novel tumour biomarkers.

Chen Liang L Sun Huiyan H Wang Changliang C Yang Yang Y Zhang Menglei M Wong Garry G

EBioMedicine 20181110

<h4>Background</h4>microRNAs have been reported to play critical roles in cancer and to have potential as diagnostic biomarkers. During miRNA biogenesis, one strand of the miRNA hairpin precursor is preferentially selected as a functionally mature miRNA, while the other strand is typically degraded. Arm switching occurs when the strand preference is changed. This preference can be different and can change dynamically depending upon the species, tissue types, or development stages. Due to recent ...[more]

PMID: 30425004

Similar Datasets

Project description:Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common and severe form of central nervous system tuberculosis. Due to the non-specific clinical presentation and lack of efficient diagnosis methods, it is difficult to discriminate TBM from other frequent types of meningitis, especially viral meningitis (VM). In order to identify the potential biomarkers for discriminating TBM and VM and to reveal the different pathophysiological processes between TBM and VM, a genome-wide miRNA screening of PBMCs from TBM, VM, and healthy controls (HCs) using microarray assay was performed (12 samples). Twenty-eight differentially expressed miRNAs were identified between TBM and VM, and 11 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified between TBM and HCs. The 6 overlapping miRNAs detected in both TBM vs. VM and TBM vs. HCs were verified by qPCR analysis and showed a 100% consistent expression patterns with that in microarray test. Statistically significant differences of 4 miRNAs (miR-126-3p, miR-130a-3p, miR-151a-3p, and miR-199a-5p) were further confirmed in TBM compared with VM and HCs in independent PBMCs sample set (n = 96, P < 0.01). Three of which were also showed significantly different between TBM and VM in CSF samples (n = 70, P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of these 4 miRNAs in PBMCs were more than 0.70 in discriminating TBM from VM. Combination of these 4 miRNAs could achieve better discriminative capacity [AUC = 0.893 (0.788-0.957)], with a sensitivity of 90.6% (75.0-98.0%), and a specificity of 86.7% (69.3-96.2%). Additional validation was performed to evaluate the diagnostic panel in another independent sample set (n = 49), which yielded a sensitivity of 81.8% (9/11), and specificity of 90.0% (9/10) in distinguishing TBM and VM, and a sensitivity of 81.8% (9/11), and a specificity of 84.6% (11/13) in discriminating TBM from other non-TBM patients. This study uncovered the miRNA profiles of TBM and VM patients, which can facilitate better understanding of the pathogenesis involved in these two diseases and identified 4 novel miRNAs in distinguishing TBM and VM.