Dataset Information

Associations of BRAP polymorphisms with the risk of alcohol dependence and scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Alcohol dependence (AD) is a common disorder that is influenced by genetic as well as environmental factors. A previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the Korean population performed by our research group identified a number of genes, including BRCA1-associated protein (BRAP) and protein arginine methyltransferase 8 (PRMT8), as novel genetic markers of AD.

Methods

The present investigation was a fine-mapping follow-up study of 459 AD and 455 non-AD subjects of Korean descent to determine the associations between BRAP and PRMT8 polymorphisms and AD. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was administered to screen for the degree of AD risk in the subjects and 58 genetic variants, 5 for BRAP and 53 for PRMT8, were genotyped for subsequent association analyses.

Results

In the present case-control analysis, BRAP rs3782886 showed the most significant association signal with a risk of AD (P=1.29×10^-16, P_corr =7.74×10^-16, OR =0.19). There were also significant differences in the overall and subcategory scores for the BRAP genetic variants, including rs3782886 (P=9.94×10^-31, P_corr =5.96×10^-30 at rs3782886 for the overall AUDIT score). However, the genetic effects of PRMT8 polymorphisms observed in our previous GWAS were not replicated in the present study (minimum P=0.0005, P_corr >0.05, OR =0.30 at rs4766139 in the recessive model). Furthermore, the single-nucleotide polymorphisms of PRMT8 were not associated with the overall and subcategory AUDIT scores.

Conclusion

The present findings suggest that the genetic variants of BRAP may contribute to a predisposition for an alcohol use disorder.

SUBMITTER: Kim JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6309135 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Associations of <i>BRAP</i> polymorphisms with the risk of alcohol dependence and scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Kim Jee Wook JW Choe Young Min YM Shin Joong-Gon JG Park Byung Lae BL Shin Hyung-Doo HD Choi Ihn-Geun IG Lee Boung Chul BC

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment 20181224

<h4>Background</h4>Alcohol dependence (AD) is a common disorder that is influenced by genetic as well as environmental factors. A previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the Korean population performed by our research group identified a number of genes, including <i>BRCA1-associated protein</i> (<i>BRAP</i>) and <i>protein arginine methyltransferase 8</i> (<i>PRMT8</i>), as novel genetic markers of AD.<h4>Methods</h4>The present investigation was a fine-mapping follow-up study of 459 AD ...[more]

PMID: 30636874

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEarly identification of potential alcohol-problems is central for timely intervention and treatment referral. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) serve as globally recognized and validated screening tools for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of internationally recommended AUDIT cut-off scores ≥ 8, ≥16, ≥ 20, and AUDIT-C cut-off scores ≥ 4, ≥5 using the Danish language versions of questionnaires in a hospital setting.MethodsQuestionnaire data were collected from 2/15/2023, to 4/27/2023 at the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. We tested the World Health Organization's recommended AUDIT cut-offs: ≥8 for hazardous use, ≥ 16 suggestive of dependence, ≥ 20 high likelihood of dependence, along with AUDIT-C ≥ 4 and ≥ 5 using the following reference standard: Danish low-risk drinking guidelines (≤ 10 standard drinks/week) for hazardous use and self-reported ICD-10 alcohol dependence criteria for alcohol dependence. Analyses included ROC curves, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and agreement.ResultsThree hundred patients participated, mean age 52 years (SD 17.4, median 54) and 51.3% males. Mean AUDIT score was 4.5 (SD 5.8, median 3) with fourteen (4.7%) meeting at least three self-reported ICD-10 criteria for alcohol dependence. The prevalence of hazardous use was 10.7%. AUDIT ≥ 8 exhibited a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI 40.6-73.6) and specificity 91% (95% CI 87.8-94.5) for detecting hazardous use. Against at least three self-reported ICD-10 criteria for alcohol dependence, AUDIT cut-off ≥ 16 showed a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 66.1-98.2) with 97% specificity (95% CI 96.0-99.2), while cut-off ≥ 20 had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI 49.2-91.6) with 99% specificity (95% CI 98.1-99.9). The AUDIT-C cut-offs ≥ 4 and ≥ 5 exhibited low positive predictive values in detecting hazardous use (30.8% for ≥ 4 and 36.8% for ≥ 5) and dependence (13.5% for ≥ 4 and 18.4% for ≥ 5) and demonstrated a specificity ranging from 68.5 to 82.1% with negative predictive values from 98.2 to 100%.ConclusionIn Danish gastroenterology and hepatology departments, the AUDIT and AUDIT-C may be used to identify patients who are unlikely to have an alcohol problem, while positive screen results should be carefully considered and followed by more exhaustive assessment.

Project description:BackgroundThe Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is commonly used in clinical settings to assess the severity of alcohol-related problems, with the effectiveness of alcohol reduction interventions varying across this spectrum. In a recent study, we demonstrated that a 12-week intervention involving the provision of free non-alcoholic beverages reduced alcohol consumption among heavy drinkers for up to 8 weeks post-intervention. However, it remains unclear whether this effect was consistent across different AUDIT score ranges. Therefore, this secondary analysis aimed to examine whether the severity of alcohol-related problems, as indicated by AUDIT scores, influences the effectiveness of non-alcoholic beverage provision in reducing alcohol consumption.MethodsThis was a single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study. Participants were Japanese individuals who frequently consumed large quantities of alcohol (at least 40 g/day for men and 20 g/day for women) but were not diagnosed with alcohol dependence. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group. The intervention group received free non-alcoholic beverages once every 4 weeks over a 12-week period (24 bottles of 350 mL per case, up to three cases per session, for a total of three sessions). Alcohol and non-alcoholic beverage consumption over the previous 4 weeks was tracked using a drinking diary. For this secondary analysis, participants were categorized into four groups based on their AUDIT scores (group 1: ≤ 7 points, group 2: 8-11 points, group 3: 12-14 points, and group 4: ≥ 15 points), and changes in alcohol consumption were compared across these groups in both the intervention and control participants.ResultsThe provision of non-alcoholic beverages significantly increased non-alcoholic beverage consumption in all groups. However, alcohol consumption was significantly reduced in the intervention groups compared to controls only in groups 1-3. The reduction in alcohol consumption was less pronounced in groups 3 and 4 compared to group 1 (both, p < 0.05). Importantly, the provision of non-alcoholic beverages did not lead to an increase in alcohol consumption, even among individuals with higher AUDIT scores.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that individuals with higher AUDIT scores may experience a reduced benefit from a 12-week non-alcoholic beverage intervention in terms of alcohol consumption reduction. Nevertheless, this intervention appears to be a safe and effective strategy for reducing alcohol consumption in heavy drinkers who do not have alcohol dependence.Trial registrationUMIN UMIN000047949. Registered 4 June 2022.

Project description:BackgroundNo validated tools exist to screen for substance use or dependence in Mozambique. The aim of this study was to validate the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) for use in primary care settings in Mozambique.MethodsThe study administered a final adapted Mozambican 10-item AUDIT (AUDIT-10-MZ) to 502 individuals from antenatal, postpartum, and general outpatient consultations in three Ministry of Health primary health care clinics in Sofala Province, Mozambique. The study evaluated the AUDIT-10-MZ against the MINI 5.0-MZ as a gold standard diagnostic tool.ResultsUsing the MINI 5.0-MZ, 16 (3.2%) of the sample tested positive for alcohol dependence and 3 (0.6%) tested positive for harmful alcohol use. The full AUDIT-10-MZ had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.74); however, the shorter AUDIT-C-MZ had a higher alpha value than the full AUDIT screener (α = 0.79). The AUDIT-10-MZ performed well for screening in primary care, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.96) for alcohol dependence. The AUDIT-C-MZ also performed well with an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.96) for alcohol dependence. Using a cut-off of ≥6, the AUDIT-10-MZ achieved a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 92.0% for screening for alcohol dependence; a cut-off of ≥3 for the AUDIT-C-MZ achieved a sensitivity of 56.3% and specificity of 90.7%.ConclusionsBoth the AUDIT-10-MZ and AUDIT-C-MZ are valid instruments for screening for alcohol dependence in Mozambique. The AUDIT-C-MZ performed particularly well and providers could use it as a brief screener in primary care settings. Optimal cut-points will depend on weighing false positives and false negatives but could be employed at ≥ 6 or ≥ 7 for the AUDIT-10-MZ and at ≥ 2 or ≥ 3 for the AUDIT-C-MZ. Future implementation research is needed to examine how best to integrate screening for substance use or dependence in primary care settings in Mozambique and other similar LMICs.