Dataset Information

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Differences between computed tomography pulmonary angiography and ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism are not well-known, leading to ongoing debate on which test to choose. We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases and identified all relevant articles and abstracts published up to October 1, 2017. We assessed diagnostic efficiency, frequency of non-diagnostic results and maternal and fetal exposure to radiation exposure. We included 13 studies for the diagnostic efficiency analysis, 30 for the analysis of non-diagnostic results and 22 for the radiation exposure analysis. The pooled rate of false negative test results was 0% for both imaging strategies with overlapping confidence intervals. The pooled rates of non-diagnostic results with computed tomography pulmonary angiography and ventilation-perfusion lung scans were 12% (95% confidence interval: 8-17) and 14% (95% confidence interval: 10-18), respectively. Reported maternal and fetal radiation exposure doses were well below the safety threshold, but could not be compared between the two diagnostic methods given the lack of high quality data. Both imaging tests seem equally safe to rule out pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. We found no significant differences in efficiency and radiation exposures between computed tomography pulmonary angiography and ventilation-perfusion lung scanning although direct comparisons were not possible.

SUBMITTER: Tromeur C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6312023 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography <i>versus</i> ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tromeur Cécile C van der Pol Liselotte M LM Le Roux Pierre-Yves PY Ende-Verhaar Yvonne Y Salaun Pierre-Yves PY Leroyer Christophe C Couturaud Francis F Kroft Lucia J M LJM Huisman Menno V MV Klok Frederikus A FA

Haematologica 20180816 1

Differences between computed tomography pulmonary angiography and ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism are not well-known, leading to ongoing debate on which test to choose. We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases and identified all relevant articles and abstracts published up to October 1, 2017. We assessed diagnostic efficiency, frequency of non-diagnostic results and maternal and fetal exposur ...[more]

PMID: 30115658

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS:Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted ? and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ? 2). RESULTS:Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). CONCLUSIONS:Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome.

Project description:PurposeComputed tomography (CT)-derived ventilation methods compute respiratory induced volume changes as a surrogate for pulmonary ventilation. Currently, there are no known methods to derive perfusion information from noncontrast CT. We introduce a novel CT-Perfusion (CT-P) method for computing the magnitude mass changes apparent on dynamic noncontrast CT as a surrogate for pulmonary perfusion.MethodsCT-Perfusion is based on a mass conservation model which describes the unknown mass change as a linear combination of spatially corresponding inhale and exhale HU estimated voxel densities. CT-P requires a deformable image registration (DIR) between the inhale/exhale lung CT pair, a preprocessing lung volume segmentation, and an estimate for the Jacobian of the DIR transformation. Given this information, the CT-P image, which provides the magnitude mass change for each voxel within the lung volume, is formulated as the solution to a constrained linear least squares problem defined by a series of subregional mean magnitude mass change measurements. Similar to previous robust CT-ventilation methods, the amount of uncertainty in a subregional sample mean measurement is related to measurement resolution and can be characterized with respect to a tolerance parameter τ . Spatial Spearman correlation between single photon emission CT perfusion (SPECT-P) and the proposed CT-P method was assessed in two patient cohorts via a parameter sweep of τ . The first cohort was comprised of 15 patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (PE) who had SPECT-P and 4DCT imaging acquired within 24 h of PE diagnosis. The second cohort was comprised of 15 nonsmall cell lung cancer patients who had SPECT-P and 4DCT images acquired prior to radiotherapy. For each test case, CT-P images were computed for 30 different uncertainty parameter values, uniformly sampled from the range [0.01, 0.125], and the Spearman correlation between the SPECT-P and the resulting CT-P images were computed.ResultsThe median correlations between CT-P and SPECT-P taken over all 30 test cases ranged between 0.49 and 0.57 across the parameter sweep. For the optimal tolerance τ = 0.0385, the CT-P and SPECT-P correlations across all 30 test cases ranged between 0.02 and 0.82. A one-sample sign test was applied separately to the PE and lung cancer cohorts. A low Spearmen correlation of 15% was set as the null median value and two-sided alternative was tested. The PE patients showed a median correlation of 0.57 (IQR = 0.305). One-sample sign test was statistically significant with 96.5 % confidence interval: 0.20-0.63, P < 0.00001. Lung cancer patients had a median correlation of 0.57(IQR = 0.230). Again, a one-sample sign test for median was statistically significant with 96.5 percent confidence interval: 0.45-0.71, P < 0.00001.ConclusionCT-Perfusion is the first mechanistic model designed to quantify magnitude blood mass changes on noncontrast dynamic CT as a surrogate for pulmonary perfusion. While the reported correlations with SPECT-P are promising, further investigation is required to determine the optimal CT acquisition protocol and numerical method implementation for CT-P imaging.

Dataset Information

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography <i>versus</i> ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets