Dataset Information

Comparison of gastric cancer survival after R0 resection in the US and China.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Gastric cancer (GC) outcomes differ between Asian and Western countries, even when controlling for contributing factors, but whether this difference holds true for China remains inadequately studied. We sought to compare the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of patients with GC undergoing curative intent (R0) resection between the US and China, and to ascertain whether geography/ institution is an independent predictor of disease-specific survival (DSS). METHODS:Data were analyzed from patients with GC undergoing R0 resection at high-volume cancer centers in the US (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC], n?=?1378) and China (Fujian Medical University Union Hospital [FMUUH], n?=?4262) between 2000 and 2014. Factors associated with DSS were examined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS:The 5-year DSS ( P??0.05). Factors independently associated with DSS included age, histology, tumor size, T category, N category, gastrectomy type, and preoperative chemotherapy, but not institution. CONCLUSIONS:Although the presentation of patients with GC between MSKCC and FMUUH differs, survival of patients with curatively resected GC, when matched for clinical stage, is comparable.

SUBMITTER: Li P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6319936 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of gastric cancer survival after R0 resection in the US and China.

Li Ping P Huang Chang-Ming CM Zheng Chao-Hui CH Russo Ashley A Kasbekar Priyanka P Brennan Murray F MF Coit Daniel G DG Strong Vivian E VE

Journal of surgical oncology 20181017 6

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>Gastric cancer (GC) outcomes differ between Asian and Western countries, even when controlling for contributing factors, but whether this difference holds true for China remains inadequately studied. We sought to compare the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of patients with GC undergoing curative intent (R0) resection between the US and China, and to ascertain whether geography/ institution is an independent predictor of disease-specific survival (DSS).<h4> ...[more]

PMID: 30332517

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that the all-cause mortality and non-colorectal cancer mortality of patients with fecal occult blood test (FOBT) positivity are significantly increased, implying that FOBT results may have more prognostic value.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed for gastric cancer (GC) patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy from July 2007 to July 2014 at our hospital. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding bias and a computerized technique for the nearest available score matching without replacement was applied. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression was used to determine the independent prognostic factors associated with survival and postoperative complications, respectively. The expression level of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) were evaluated by immunohistochemical (IHC).ResultsA total of 3,003 patients were included and 246 patients (8.2%) were in preoperative FOBT positive status. There was no significant difference in demographic data between preoperative FOBT positive and negative group after a 1:4 PSM. The overall postoperative complications, major complications, and anastomotic leakage were significantly higher in the preoperative FOBT-positive group than in the preoperative FOBT-negative group. Moreover, preoperative FOBT-positivity was an independent risk factor for 5-year overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.32, p = 0.005). For stage II/III patients, the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) benefit was found in preoperative FOBT-negative group (5-year OS: 49.9 vs. 36.8%, p = 0.001), whereas the PAC benefit was lost in preoperative FOBT-positive groups (5-year OS: 40.8 vs. 37.7% p = 0.896). Finally, IHC found that preoperative FOBT-positivity in patients was significantly associated with higher TAMs infiltration and higher expression of IL-6 and TNF-α in tumor tissues than in the preoperative FOBT-negative group.ConclusionAs a simple and low-cost method, preoperative FOBT results can predict both complications and survival after R0 gastrectomy for GC. More importantly, stage II/III GC patients with FOBT-positive seem not benefit from PAC alone. Further exploration is warranted.

Project description:BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery currently offers promise as a strategy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, there is limited evidence to guide treatment for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection. This study set out to explore the optimal management for TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC after R0 resection.MethodsThe retrospective data of 154 TRG 0 and 1 patients with locally advanced GC following R0 resection who were treated between January 2012 and December 2018 were collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThe median follow-up was 34.1 (range, 6.6-90.9) months. Six patients (3.9%) were lost during follow-up. Of the 27 patients who experienced relapse, 12 died, including 2 patients who died of non-neoplastic causes. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 71.6% (95% CI: 68.5-79.6) and 82.9% (95% CI: 76.9-86.1) for the whole cohort, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5.0 ng/ml after NAC (77.7% vs. 20.1%, P<0.001), distal gastrectomy (91.7% vs. 67.5%, P=0.046) had higher 5-year RFS. Meanwhile, combined resection (55.6% vs. 73.1%, P=0.042), major complications (42.7% vs. 80.50%, P<0.001), and lymph node metastasis (ypN+) (52.0% vs. 83.7%, P<0.001) had lower 5-year RFS. The multivariate analysis showed that CEA level after NAC (HR =2.876, 95% CI: 1.051-7.872, P=0.040), major complications (HR =2.432, 95% CI: 1.062-5.567, P=0.035), and lymph node metastasis (ypN+) (HR =3.183, 95% CI: 1.242-8.161, P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors.ConclusionsTRG 0 and 1 patients with local GC after R0 resection following NAC had a good prognosis, especially patients with CEA <5.0 ng/mL after NAC, and those without major complications or lymph node metastasis. Monotherapy or no chemotherapy may offer options for treating TRG 0 and 1 patients without adverse prognostic factors.

Dataset Information

Comparison of gastric cancer survival after R0 resection in the US and China.

Publications

Comparison of gastric cancer survival after R0 resection in the US and China.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets