Dataset Information

Trends of Clinical Trials for Drug Development in Rare Diseases.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Drug development for rare diseases is challenging because it is difficult to obtain relevant data from very few patients. It must be informative to grasp current status of clinical trials for drug development in rare diseases. OBJECTIVE:Clinical trials in rare diseases are to be outlined and compared among the US, EU and Japan. METHOD:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT, National Clinical Trial), EU Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) and the Japan Primary Registries Network (JPRN) were analyzed. Clinical trials involving information on rare diseases and drugs were extracted by text-mining, based on the diseases and drugs derived from Orphanet and DrugBank, respectively. RESULTS:In total, 28,526 clinical trials were extracted, which studied 1,535 rare diseases and 1,539 drugs. NCT had the largest number of trials, involving 1,252 diseases and 1,332 drugs. EUCTR and JPRN also had registry-specific diseases (250 and 22, respectively) and drugs (172 and 29, respectively) that should not be missed. Among the 1,535 rare diseases, most diseases were studied in only a limited number of trials; 70% of diseases were studied in fewer than 10 trials, and 28% were studied in only one. Additionally, most studied rare diseases were cancer-related ones. CONCLUSION:This study has revealed the characteristics of the clinical trials in rare diseases among the US, EU and Japan. The number of trials for rare diseases was limited especially for non-cancerrelated ones. This information could contribute to drug development such as drug-repositioning in rare diseases.

SUBMITTER: Sakate R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6327118 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Trends of Clinical Trials for Drug Development in Rare Diseases.

Sakate Ryuichi R Fukagawa Akiko A Takagaki Yuri Y Okura Hanayuki H Matsuyama Akifumi A

Current clinical pharmacology 20180101 3

<h4>Background</h4>Drug development for rare diseases is challenging because it is difficult to obtain relevant data from very few patients. It must be informative to grasp current status of clinical trials for drug development in rare diseases.<h4>Objective</h4>Clinical trials in rare diseases are to be outlined and compared among the US, EU and Japan.<h4>Method</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT, National Clinical Trial), EU Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) and the Japan Primary Registries Network (J ...[more]

PMID: 29866013

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOrphan drug designations are a useful proxy to investigate trends in rare disease drug development. Drug developers must receive a designation before they are eligible for the economic incentives of the Orphan Drug Act in the United States. We created a database of all orphan drugs designated between 1983 and 2019 that included numerous drug characteristics, including therapeutic area. In addition, we constructed a "broad disease" categorization of designations as an alternative to therapeutic area, based on disease etiology and age of onset rather than organ system. By looking at the pattern of orphan drug designations over the past four decades, this analysis studied the impact of the evolving rare disease drug development landscape and considers the future of rare disease therapies over the coming decades.ResultsBetween 1983 and 2019, a total of 5099 drugs and biologics received orphan drug designation. Designations more than doubled between the 1980s and 1990s, almost doubled between the 1990s and 2000s, and almost tripled in number between the 2000s and 2010s. The top three therapeutic areas represented in the orphan drug designations were: oncology (1910, 37%), neurology (674, 13%), and infectious diseases (436, 9%). The broad disease categorization found that the proportion of designations for pediatric-onset diseases has increased in the most recent decade to 27%.ConclusionsAnalysis of the last four decades of orphan drug designation indicates seismic shifts have occurred in the rare disease drug development space. The number of designations granted more than quadrupled between the 1990s and 2010s. While these substantial increases led to growth in the absolute number of designations within all therapeutic areas (bar one) and broad disease categories, the relative proportions have seen considerable change over time. In the most recent decade, there have been notable increases in the proportion of drugs in oncology, pediatric-onset diseases, and neurologic disorders. The dramatic rise in overall orphan designations over the past four decades suggests we may continue to see an upward trajectory in designations leading to an increased number of approvals for drugs and biologics designed specifically for diagnosing, preventing, and treating rare diseases in the coming decades.

Project description:Purpose: To investigate the trends and progresses in glaucoma research by searching two major clinical trial registries; clinicaltrials.gov, and Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au. Methods: All clinical trials with glaucoma covered by Clinicaltrials.gov, and Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au starting the study before 1 January 2021 were included. Trials evaluating glaucoma treatment were separated from non-treatment trials and divided into three major categories: "laser treatment," "surgical treatment," and "medical treatment." In the category of "medical treatment," new compounds and their individual targets were identified and subcategorized according to treatment strategy; intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering, neuroprotective or vascular. The phase transition success rates were calculated. Results: One-thousand five hundred and thirty-seven trials were identified. Sixty-three percent (n = 971) evaluated glaucoma treatment, of which medical treatment accounted for the largest proportion (53%). The majority of medical trials evaluated IOP-lowering compounds, while trials with neuroprotective or vascular compounds accounted for only 5 and 3%, respectively. Eighty-eight new compounds were identified. Phase I, II, and III transition success rates were 63, 26, and 47%, respectively. Conclusion: The number of clinical trials in glaucoma research has increased significantly over the last 30 years. Among the most recently evaluated compounds, all three main treatment strategies were represented, but clinical trials in neuroprotection and vascular modalities are still sparse. In addition to traditional medicines, dietary supplements and growth factors are assessed for a potential anti-glaucomatous effect. Phase II and III success rates were below previously reported success rates for all diseases and ophthalmology in general. A stricter phenotyping of patients can improve the success rates in glaucoma and ophthalmological research and gain a better understanding of responders and non-responders.

Dataset Information

Trends of Clinical Trials for Drug Development in Rare Diseases.

Publications

Trends of Clinical Trials for Drug Development in Rare Diseases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets