Dataset Information

Infection-prevention and control interventions to reduce colonisation and infection of intensive care unit-acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a 4-year quasi-experimental before-and-after study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine whether infection-prevention and control (IPC) interventions can reduce the colonisation and infection of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in a general ICU ward in China.

Methods

We used a quasi-experimental before-and-after study design. The study was conducted in 4 stages: baseline period, January 2013-June 2013; IPC interventions period including de-escalation and targeted bundle interventions, July 2013-June 2014; modified IPC interventions period, July 2014-June 2015; and follow-up period, July 2015-June 2016. We used modified de-escalation interventions according to patient-risk assessments to prevent the transmission of CRKP.

Results

A total of 629 patients were enrolled in study. The incidence of ICU-acquired CRKP colonisation/infection was 10.08 (4.43-16.43) per 1000 ICU patient-days during the baseline period, and significantly decreased early during the IPC interventions, but the colonisation/infections reappeared in April 2014. During the modified IPC intervention and follow-up periods, the incidence of ICU-acquired CRKP colonisations/infections reduced to 5.62 (0.69-6.34) and 2.84 (2.80-2.89), respectively, with ongoing admission of cases with previously acquired CRKP. The incidence of ICU-acquired CRKP catheter-related bloodstream infections decreased from 2.54 during the baseline period to 0.41 during the follow-up period. The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infections showed a downward trend from 2.84 to 0.41 and from 3.4 to 0.47, respectively, with slight fluctuations.

Conclusions

Comprehensive IPC interventions including de-escalation and targeted bundle interventions showed a significant reduction in ICU-acquired CRKP colonisations/infections, despite ongoing admission of patients colonised/infected with CRKP.

SUBMITTER: Li M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6329090 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesCarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection/colonisation has been reported in hospitals. The clinical characteristics of CRKP infection/colonisation in the intensive care unit (ICU) have received little attention. This study aims to investigate the epidemiology and extent of K. pneumoniae (KP) resistance to carbapenems, the sources of CRKP patients and CRKP isolates, and the risk factors for CRKP infection/colonisation.DesignRetrospective single-centre study.Data sourceClinical data were obtained from electronic medical records.ParticipantsPatients isolated with KP in the ICU from January 2012 to December 2020.Main outcome measuresThe prevalence and changing trend of CRKP were determined. The extent of KP isolates resistance to carbapenems, the specimen types of KP isolates, and the sources of CRKP patients and CRKP isolates were all examined. The risk factors for CRKP infection/colonisation were also assessed.ResultsThe rate of CRKP in KP isolates raised from 11.11% in 2012 to 48.92% in 2020. CRKP isolates were detected in one site in 266 patients (70.56%). The percentage of CRKP isolates not susceptible to imipenem increased from 42.86% in 2012 to 98.53% in 2020. The percentage of CRKP patients from general wards in our hospital and other hospitals gradually converged in 2020 (47.06% vs 52.94%). CRKP isolates were mainly acquired in our ICU (59.68%). Younger age (p=0.018), previous admission (p=0.018), previous ICU stay (p=0.008), prior use of surgical drainage (p=0.012) and gastric tube (p=0.001), and use of carbapenems (p=0.000), tigecycline (p=0.005), β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (p=0.000), fluoroquinolones (p=0.033), and antifungal drugs (p=0.011) within the prior 3 months were independent risk factors for CRKP infection/colonisation.ConclusionsOverall, the rate of KP isolates resistance to carbapenems increased, and the severity of this resistance significantly increased. Intensive and local infection/colonisation control measures are necessary for ICU patients, especially those with risk factors for CRKP infection/colonisation.

Project description:We conducted a 6-month prospective study in a newly opened ICU for high-resolution tracking of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) through environmental surveillance, patient screening, and genome sequencing. Among all ICU patients (n = 348) screened, 3.5% carried CRKP on admission and 16.3% acquired CRKP thereafter. CRKP was not detected in the environment until 10 weeks and was then isolated from 98 of 2,989 environmental samples (3.3%). The first CRKP isolate from rectal swabs (n = 37) and the first clinical isolate (n = 8) of each patient as well as the 98 isolates from environmental were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. The 143 CRKP isolates from patients and environment samples were assigned to four sequence types, with ST11 dominating (95.8%) and further divided into 14 clones, suggesting introduction of multiple clones. Subsequent CRKP transmission was complex and dynamic with 10 clones found in multiple patients and seven also detected in the environment. Two particular ST11 clones caused extensive (≥5 rooms) and persistent (≥10 weeks) environmental contamination. Both clones were associated with patients who carried CRKP throughout their prolonged ICU stay. Such "super-contaminators" are a priority for isolation and environmental surveillance. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a global challenge for human health. In health care settings, patients have frequent interactions with other patients and the environment, rendering challenges for untangling the introduction and transmission of CRKP. We conducted a prospective surveillance study in a newly opened ICU for high-resolution tracking of CRKP. Our study demonstrated the dynamic, complicated transmission of CRKP and has important findings that may help to curb its spread in health care settings. First, compliance with basic measures such as routine environment cleaning and postdischarge terminal cleaning is needed to minimize the environmental contamination-driven spread. Second, active screening could demonstrate the scale of the problem, and room transfer of patients with CRKP should be prohibited whenever possible. Third, the priority for single-room isolation should be given to patients with prolonged carriage of CRKP, especially in resource-limited settings. Good infection control practice lays a foundation for tackling multidrug-resistant organisms like CRKP.