Dataset Information

Basics of Infant Conventional Mechanical Ventilation: An Interactive Animated Teaching Module.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:While conventional mechanical ventilation is a common therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), pediatric residents receive insufficient instruction. This stand-alone computer module provides an interactive method of learning basic infant pulmonary physiology and principles of mechanical ventilation. Methods:This module runs offline and is compatible with a variety of operating systems. Participants complete a six-question, case-based pretest. The seven-section instructional module is self-paced, narrated, animated, and interactive. Learners can repeat each section as needed. At the conclusion of the module, participants complete the same six-question test and receive feedback. In total, the module requires 15-20 minutes to complete. Results:The curriculum has been implemented at the beginning of the NICU rotation over a 2-year period within our pediatric residency program. Participants preferred this interactive module and had higher posttest scores when compared to a PowerPoint presentation. After 4 months, there was evidence of knowledge decay. Discussion:The interactive module is enjoyable, effective, and convenient. It engages participants in active learning and allows them to control the time and pace of their instruction. We have implemented the curriculum within our residency program and believe it would be useful for a variety of NICU health care providers.

SUBMITTER: Aurora ME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6338144 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Basics of Infant Conventional Mechanical Ventilation: An Interactive Animated Teaching Module.

Aurora Megan E ME Kopek Kristinna K Weiner Gary M GM Donn Steven M SM

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources 20171214

<h4>Introduction</h4>While conventional mechanical ventilation is a common therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), pediatric residents receive insufficient instruction. This stand-alone computer module provides an interactive method of learning basic infant pulmonary physiology and principles of mechanical ventilation.<h4>Methods</h4>This module runs offline and is compatible with a variety of operating systems. Participants complete a six-question, case-based pretest. The seven-sect ...[more]

PMID: 30800859

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLung-protective ventilation is key in bridging patients suffering from COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to recovery. However, resource and personnel limitations during pandemics complicate the implementation of lung-protective protocols. Automated ventilation modes may prove decisive in these settings enabling higher degrees of lung-protective ventilation than conventional modes.MethodProspective study at a Swiss university hospital. Critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients were allocated, by study-blinded coordinating staff, to either closed-loop or conventional mechanical ventilation, based on mechanical ventilator availability. Primary outcome was the overall achieved percentage of lung-protective ventilation in closed-loop versus conventional mechanical ventilation, assessed minute-by-minute, during the initial 7 days and overall mechanical ventilation time. Lung-protective ventilation was defined as the combined target of tidal volume <8 ml per kg of ideal body weight, dynamic driving pressure <15 cmH2O, peak pressure <30 cmH2O, peripheral oxygen saturation ≥88% and dynamic mechanical power <17 J/min.ResultsForty COVID-19 ARDS patients, accounting for 1,048,630 minutes (728 days) of cumulative mechanical ventilation, allocated to either closed-loop (n = 23) or conventional ventilation (n = 17), presenting with a median paO2/ FiO2 ratio of 92 [72-147] mmHg and a static compliance of 18 [11-25] ml/cmH2O, were mechanically ventilated for 11 [4-25] days and had a 28-day mortality rate of 20%. During the initial 7 days of mechanical ventilation, patients in the closed-loop group were ventilated lung-protectively for 65% of the time versus 38% in the conventional group (Odds Ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.76-1.82; P < 0.001) and for 45% versus 33% of overall mechanical ventilation time (Odds Ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.23; P < 0.001).ConclusionAmong critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients during an early highpoint of the pandemic, mechanical ventilation using a closed-loop mode was associated with a higher degree of lung-protective ventilation than was conventional mechanical ventilation.

Project description:Introduction and aim:Studies regarding asynchrony in patients in the cardiac postoperative period are still only a few. The main objective of our study was to compare asynchronies incidence and its index (AI) in 3 different modes of ventilation (volume-controlled ventilation [VCV], pressure-controlled ventilation [PCV] and pressure-support ventilation [PSV]) after ICU admission for postoperative care. Methods:A prospective parallel randomised trialin the setting of a non-profitable hospital in Brazil. The participants were patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to VCV or PCV modes of ventilation and later both groups were transitioned to PSV mode. Results:All data were recorded for 5 minutes in each of the three different phases: T1) in assisted breath, T2) initial spontaneous breath and T3) final spontaneous breath, a marking point prior to extubation. Asynchronies were detected and counted by visual inspection method by two independent investigators. Reliability, inter-rater agreement of asynchronies, asynchronies incidence, total and specific asynchrony indexes (AIt and AIspecific) and odds of AI ?10% weighted by total asynchrony were analysed. A total of 17 patients randomly allocated to the VCV (n=9) or PCV (n=8) group completed the study. High inter-rated agreement for AIt (ICC 0.978; IC95%, 0,963-0.987) and good reliability (r=0.945; p<0.001) were found. Eighty-two % of patients presented asynchronies, although only 7% of their total breathing cycles were asynchronous. Early cycling and double triggering had the highest rates of asynchrony with no difference between groups. The highest odds of AI ?10% were observed in VCV regardless the phase: OR 2.79 (1.36-5.73) in T1 vs T2, p=0.005; OR 2.61 (1.27-5.37) in T1 vs T3, p=0.009 and OR 4.99 (2.37-10.37) in T2 vs T3, p<0.001. Conclusions:There was a high incidence of breathing asynchrony in postoperative cardiac patients, especially when initially ventilated in VCV. VCV group had a higher chance of AI ?10% and this chance remained high in the following PSV phases.

Dataset Information

Basics of Infant Conventional Mechanical Ventilation: An Interactive Animated Teaching Module.

Publications

Basics of Infant Conventional Mechanical Ventilation: An Interactive Animated Teaching Module.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets