Dataset Information

Age-related strength loss affects non-stepping balance recovery.

ABSTRACT: Aging is associated with a higher risk of falls, and an impaired ability to recover balance after a postural perturbation is an important contributing factor. In turn, this impaired recovery ability likely stems from age-related decrements in lower limb strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of age-related strength loss on non-stepping balance recovery capability after a perturbation while standing, without constraining movements to the ankle as in prior reports. Two experiments were conducted. In the first, five young adults (ages 20-30) and six community-dwelling older adults (ages 70-80) recovered their balance, without stepping, from a backward displacement of a support surface. Balance recovery capability was quantified as the maximal backward platform displacement that a subject could withstand without stepping. The maximal platform displacement was 27% smaller among the older group (11.8±2.1 cm) vs. the young group (16.2±2.6 cm). In the second experiment, forward dynamic simulations of a two-segment, rigid-body model were used to investigate the effects of manipulating strength in the hip extensors/flexors and ankle plantar flexors/dorsiflexors. In these, typical age-related reductions in strength were included. The model predicted lower maximal platform displacements with age-related reductions only in plantar flexion and hip flexion strength. These findings support the previously reported age-related loss of balance recovery ability, and an important role for plantar flexor strength in this ability.

SUBMITTER: Koushyar H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6338353 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Age-related strength loss affects non-stepping balance recovery.

Koushyar Hoda H Bieryla Kathleen A KA Nussbaum Maury A MA Madigan Michael L ML

PloS one 20190118 1

Aging is associated with a higher risk of falls, and an impaired ability to recover balance after a postural perturbation is an important contributing factor. In turn, this impaired recovery ability likely stems from age-related decrements in lower limb strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of age-related strength loss on non-stepping balance recovery capability after a perturbation while standing, without constraining movements to the ankle as in prior reports. Two ...[more]

PMID: 30657760

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMost of older adults' falls are related to inefficient balance recovery after an unexpected loss of balance, i.e., postural perturbation. Effective balance recovery responses are crucial to prevent falls. Due to the considerable consequences of lateral falls and the high incidence of falls when walking, this study aimed to examine the effect of a concurrent cognitive task on older adults' balance recovery stepping abilities from unannounced lateral perturbations while walking. We also aimed to explore whether cognitive performance accuracy is affected by perturbed walking and between task trade-offs.MethodsIn a laboratory-based study, 20 older adults (> 70 years old) performed the following test conditions: (1) cognitive task while sitting; (2) perturbed walking; and (3) perturbed walking with a concurrent cognitive task. The cognitive task was serial numbers subtraction by seven. Single-step and multiple-step thresholds, highest perturbation achieved, 3D kinematic analysis of the first recovery step, and cognitive task performance accuracy were compared between single-task and dual-task conditions. Between task trade-offs were examined using dual-task cost (DTC).ResultsSingle-step and multiple-step thresholds, number of recovery step trials, number of foot collision, multiple-step events and kinematic recovery step parameters were all similar in single-task and dual-task conditions. Cognitive performance was not significantly affected by dual-task conditions, however, different possible trade-offs between cognitive and postural performances were identified using DTC.ConclusionsIn situations where postural threat is substantial, such as unexpected balance loss during walking, balance recovery reactions were unaffected by concurrent cognitive load in older adults (i.e., posture first strategy). The study was approved by the Helsinki Ethics Committee of Soroka University Medical Center in Beer-Sheva, Israel (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number NCT04455607 , ID Numbers: Sor 396-16 CTIL; 02/07/2020).

Project description:BACKGROUND:Compensatory stepping thresholds evaluate the response to postural disturbances. Although such fall-recovery measures are a promising indicator of fall risk, the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measures used to predict falls are not well established. RESEARCH QUESTION:We sought to quantify the relationships between stepping thresholds and other measurements used to assess fall risk in older women, a population at high risk for falls and related injuries, including fractures. METHODS:We studied 112 ambulatory, community-dwelling women, age 65 years or older. Using a treadmill to deliver standing postural disturbances, we determined anterior and posterior single-stepping and multiple-stepping thresholds. These thresholds represented the magnitude of the disturbance that elicited one step or more than one step, respectively. We also assessed balance confidence, functional reach, unipedal stance time, isometric strength, obstacle crossing, postural sway, and gait kinematics. Outcomes were normalized to body size. RESULTS:After accounting for age, stepping thresholds were, at most, moderately correlated (Pearson partial correlation coefficients r?=?0.20 to 0.40 and r = -0.21 to -0.31) to several assessments of gait, postural control, and strength. Approximately 24-52% of the variance in stepping thresholds was explained by a combination of age and other fall risk assessments, which frequently consisted of balance confidence, unipedal stance time, obstacle crossing, the Romberg ratio of postural sway, and/or strength. SIGNIFICANCE:Our results suggest that anteroposterior fall-recovery ability, as assessed by stepping thresholds, can only be partially inferred from age and a combination of assessments of sway, strength, unipedal tasks, and balance confidence. Compensatory stepping thresholds may provide information on stability maintenance unique from other assessments of fall risk. Further investigation would be necessary to determine whether stepping thresholds are better predictors of falls in older women.

Project description:BackgroundGeneralized Joint hypermobility (GJH) is predominantly non-symptomatic. In fact, individuals with joint flexibility usually perform better than their non-hypermobile counterparts during physical activities. Notwithstanding, strength and balance are essential to maintain the control of the extra range of motion during activities and to prevent musculoskeletal complications. There are limited and conflicting pieces of evidence in literature regarding the association between strength and balance in children with GJH.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine differences in functional strength, dynamic balance, proprioception, and isometric strength in children with and without joint hypermobility and determine the association between strength outcomes and dynamic balance.MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged 6 to 11. Hypermobility was determined using the Beighton Score, with scores ≥6 representing hypermobility. Functional strength was assessed with the Functional Strength Measure (FSM), isometric strength was determined with a handheld dynamometer (HHD), the Y-Balance Test (YBT) was used to assess dynamic balance and the Wedges test to measure proprioception.ResultsThis study included 588 participants (age: 7.97 ± 1.3 years; height: 128±10.1 cm; mass: 27.18 ± 7.98 kg). 402 children were classified as having normal mobility and 186 as being hypermobile. Hypermobile children had better functional strength in the lower extremities than children with normal range mobility but lower reach distance in the YBT. No differences in proprioception, functional strength of the upper extremity or isometric strength in the hands were found. However, isometric lower extremity force was less in hypermobile children than children with normal range mobility. Irrespective of their joint mobility, a fair significant correlation existed between total Y-balance distance and FSM items r = 0.16-0.37, p = 0.01. Correlations between total Y-balance distance and isometric strength of knee and ankle muscles ranged between r = 0.26-0.42, p = 0.001.ConclusionHypermobile joints seem to co-occur with lower extremity isometric strength, more functional strength in the lower extremities and less reaching distance in dynamic balance. The opposing direction of the results on functional and isometric strength tests highlights the importance of the type of outcome measures used to describe the association of strength and the range of motion.

Dataset Information

Age-related strength loss affects non-stepping balance recovery.

Publications

Age-related strength loss affects non-stepping balance recovery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets