Characteristics of Hospitals Exiting the Newly Voluntary Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Program.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kim H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6342001 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Characteristics of Hospitals Exiting the Newly Voluntary Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Program.
Kim Hyunjee H Meath Thomas H A THA Grunditz Jenny I JI Quiñones Ana R AR Ibrahim Said A SA McConnell K John KJ
JAMA internal medicine 20181201 12
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model is an alternative Medicare payment model for joint replacement that mandated participation by hospitals in randomly selected Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). On average, the program decreased inpatient length of stay and increased home discharge rates. It is unclear if these effects differed based on hospital ownership type, even though ownership may impact care redesign opportunities.MethodsWe used the 2014-2017 California Patient Discharge Datasets. The study included 113,590 hospitalizations for hip and knee joint replacement from 287 hospitals in the treated and control MSAs in California. The primary outcomes were inpatient length of stay and home discharge rates. Home discharge status included self-care, the use of home health, and hospice care at home. To determine whether the impact of the CJR model differed by hospital ownership type, we used event study, difference-in-differences (DID), and triple differences (DDD) models to estimate changes in health care services utilization in treated relative to control areas before versus after CJR implementation (April 2016) by hospital ownership type.ResultsOf the 113,590 hospitalizations, 51,708 (45.52%) were in treated MSAs and 61,882 (54.48%) were in control MSAs; 81,649 (71.88%) were from nonprofit hospitals, 20,247 (17.82%) were from for-profit hospitals, and 11,694 (10.29%) were from government-owned hospitals. DID analyses showed that after policy implementation, nonprofit and for-profit hospitals experienced a decrease in inpatient length of stay of 0.02 days (95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01) and 0.04 days (95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01), respectively, while government-owned hospitals experienced an increase by 0.11 days (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.18). For home discharge rates, nonprofit hospitals experienced an increase of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03), while other hospitals did not show statistically significant changes. DDD analyses confirmed that inpatient length of stay increased in public compared to nonprofit hospitals in treated relative to control MSAs after policy implementation.ConclusionsThe impacts of the CJR program differed by hospital ownership type. Government-owned hospitals, with their unique financial circumstances, may have faced challenges that hindered the reductions in inpatient length of stay observed in other types of hospitals under the CJR Model.
| S-EPMC11603975 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model introduced in 2016 aims to improve the quality and costs of care for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hip and knee replacements. However, there are concerns that the safety-net hospitals that care for the greatest number of vulnerable patients may perform poorly in CJR. In this study we used Medicare's CJR data to evaluate the performance of 792 hospitals mandated to participate in the first year of CJR. We found that in comparison to non-safety-net hospitals, 42 percent fewer safety-net hospitals qualified for rewards based on their quality and spending performance (33 percent of safety-net hospitals qualified, compared to 57 percent of non-safety-net hospitals), and safety-net hospitals' rewards per episode were 39 percent smaller ($456 compared to $743). Continuation of this performance trend could place safety-net hospitals at increased risk of penalties in future years. Medicare and hospital strategies such as those that reward high-quality care for vulnerable patients could enable safety-net hospitals to compete effectively in CJR.
| S-EPMC6446900 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportancePrior research concluded that institutional postacute care spending decreased under the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. Less is known about how changes in institutional postacute care spending varied across different types of hospitals.ObjectiveTo measure hospital-level heterogeneity in the association of the CJR model with changes in institutional postacute care spending and to identify hospital characteristics associated with this variation.Design setting and participantsUsing 100% Medicare claims data, this cross-sectional study assessed institutional postacute care spending from 2016 to 2017 among US hospitals randomly selected to participate in the CJR model and control group hospitals that were eligible but not selected for the participation in the CJR model. A causal forest was used to estimate the treatment effect of the CJR model conditional on hospital characteristics. Analysis was conducted between October 2019 and October 2021.Main outcomes and measuresThe unit of analysis was each hospital; the outcome was the average per-episode Medicare spending for institutional postacute care within 90 days after hospital discharge for hip or knee joint replacement.ResultsThis study included 531 CJR participating hospitals and 658 control group hospitals from 2016 to 2017. The CJR model was associated with a $761 reduction in institutional postacute care spending (95% CI, -$1172 to -$351). The reduction in spending under the CJR model did not vary across conditional on hospital characteristics. Limited evidence was found for greater savings among hospitals with higher pre-CJR spending. However, this finding did not hold for hospitals in the highest quintile of pre-CJR spending.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study of 1189 hospitals, findings did not show strong evidence for significant heterogeneity in how the CJR model was associated with reductions in institutional postacute care spending across a range of hospital characteristics. Savings were not concentrated in hospitals with specific characteristics, such as hospitals with high-volume joint replacement or hospitals serving less medically or socially complex patients. Findings suggest that the CJR model created opportunities for savings across a spectrum of different hospitals.
| S-EPMC9206192 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the relative progress of safety-net hospitals (SNHs) under Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) mandatory bundled payment model over 2016-2020 and to identify the contributors to SNHs' realization of success under the program.Data sources/study settingSecondary data on all CJR hospitals were collected from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) public use files and from the American Hospital Association.Study designWe addressed whether SNHs can achieve progress in financial performance under CJR by focusing on the relative change in reconciliation payments or the difference between episode spending and target prices. We applied the method of dominance analysis to ordinary least squares regression to determine the relative importance of predictors of change in reconciliation payments over time.Principal findingsCompared to CJR hospitals overall, SNHs were less successful in meeting episode spending targets. Hospital factors dominated socioeconomic factors in explaining progress among SNHs, but not among non-SNHs. The contribution of nurse staffing was negligible across all CJR hospitals.ConclusionsThe formula used by CMS to determine spending targets may not be sufficient to address disparities in SNH financial performance under mandatory bundled payment.
| S-EPMC9836942 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveWe aim to assess whether system providers perform better than nonsystem providers under an alternative payment model that incentivizes high-quality, cost-efficient care. We posit that the payment environment and the incentives it provides can affect the relative performance of vertically integrated health systems. To examine this potential influence, we compare system and nonsystem hospitals participating in Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model.Data sourcesWe used hospital cost and quality data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services linked to data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Compendium of US Health Systems and hospital characteristics from secondary sources. The data include 706 hospitals in 67 metropolitan areas.Study designWe estimated regressions that compared system and nonsystem hospitals' 2017 cost and quality performance providing lower joint replacements among hospitals required to participate in CJR.Principal findingsAmong CJR hospitals, system hospitals that provided comprehensive services in their local market had 5.8 percent ($1612) lower episode costs (P = .01) than nonsystem hospitals. System hospitals that did not provide such services had 3.5 percent ($967) lower episode costs (P = .14). Quality differences between system hospitals and nonsystem hospitals were mostly small and statistically insignificant.ConclusionsWhen operating under alternative payment model incentives, vertical integration may enable hospitals to lower costs with similar quality scores.
| S-EPMC7375995 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The University of Missouri Health Care is a 5-hospital academic medical center with 595 beds, located in the central United States. Our system was selected for mandatory participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundled payment model and participated from April 2016 through December 2017. Using an established improvement model, we implemented several key strategies which resulted in improved quality and lower overall costs.
| S-EPMC6588682 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, a mandatory episode-based payment program for knee and hip replacement surgery, affected patient-reported measures of quality.Data sourcesSurveys of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had hip or knee replacement surgery, collected between July 2018 and March 2019, secondary Medicare administrative data, the Provider of Services file, CJR and Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participant lists from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and the Area Health Resource Files.Study designIn 2018, participation in the CJR model was mandatory for nearly all hospitals in 34 randomly selected, metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that had high historical Medicare payments for lower-extremity joint replacements surgery. The control group included 47 high-payment MSAs randomly assigned as controls. We estimated risk-adjusted differences in self-reported measures of functional status and pain, satisfaction with care, and caregiver help between respondents in CJR hospitals and respondents in hospitals located in the control group.Data collectionWe selected a census of CJR patients and an equal number of control patients to survey. We fielded two waves of surveys using a mail and phone protocol, yielding 8433 CJR and 9014 control respondents.Principal findingsCJR respondents were slightly more likely to depend on caregivers for certain activities of daily living when they got home (either directly from the hospital or after an institutional post-acute care stay). On a 100-point scale, differences ranged from -2.6 points (p < 0.01) for help needed bathing to -1.7 points (p < 0.05) for help needed using the toilet. However, differences in eight measures of self-reported functional status approximately 90-120 days after hospital discharge were not statistically significant, ranging from -1.1% (p = 0.087) to 0.7% (p = 0.437).ConclusionsCJR did not harm patient health or affect patient satisfaction on average but did increase reliance on caregivers during recovery.
| S-EPMC9441280 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTotal joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains the highest expenditure in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) budget. One model to control cost is the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. There has been no published literature to date examining the efficacy of CJR on value-based outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and sustainability of a multidisciplinary care redesign for total joint arthroplasty under the CJR paradigm at an academic tertiary care center.MethodsWe implemented a system-wide care redesign, affecting all patients who underwent a total hip or total knee arthroplasty at our academic medical center. The main study outcomes were cost (to CMS), discharge destination, complications and readmissions, and length of stay (LOS); these were measured using the 2017 initial CJR reconciliation report, as well as our institutional database.ResultsThe study included 1536 patients (41% Medicare). Per-episode cost to CMS declined by 19.5% to 11% below the CMS-designated national target. Home discharge increased from 62% to 87%. CMS readmissions declined from 15% to 6%; major complications decreased from 2.3% to 1.9%; and LOS declined from 3.6 to 2.1 days.ConclusionsA mandatory episode-based bundled-payment program can induce favorable changes to value-based metrics, improving quality and outcomes for health-care consumers. Quality and value were improved in this study, evidenced by lower 90-day episode cost, more home discharges, lower readmissions and complications, and shorter LOS. This approach has implications not just for CMS, but for private payers, corporate health programs, and fixed-budget health-care models.
| S-EPMC5994641 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8164097 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe downstream regional effect of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program on care pathway-adjacent patients, including revision arthroplasty patients, is poorly understood. Prior studies have demonstrated that care pathways targeting primary total joint arthroplasty may produce a halo effect, impacting more complex patients with parallel care pathways. However, neither the effect of regional referral changes from CJR nor the durability of these positive changes with prolonged bundle participation has been assessed.MethodsBlinded data were pulled from electronic medical records. Primary analyses focused on the effect of CJR participation from 2015 (baseline) to 2020 (final participation year) at a tertiary care safety-net hospital. Patient demographics were evaluated using multivariate analysis of variance and chi-square calculations between procedure types over time.ResultsPatients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty (N = 376) and revision total hip arthroplasty (N = 482) were included. More patients moved through the revision-care pathway over the participation period, with volume increasing by 42% over time. Patients became more medically complex: the Charlson comorbidity index increased from 3.91 to 4.65 (P = .01). The mean length of stay decreased from 5.14 days to 4.50 days (P = .03), but the all-cause complication (8.3%-15.2%; P = .02) and readmission rates (13.6%-16.6%; P = .19) increased over time.ConclusionsDespite care pathway improvements over 5 years of CJR participation, revision patients did not display clear benefits in quality metrics but demonstrated a considerable increase in volume and medical complexity over time. The care of these patients may supersede even thoughtfully implemented care pathways, especially when referral burden increases, as may be prone to happen in regional, financial risk-conferring value-based programs. Understanding the impact of mandatory bundled payment programs like CJR on the care of arthroplasty patients regionally will be essential as value-based programs evolve.
| S-EPMC11295625 | biostudies-literature