Dataset Information

Interprofessional Health Care Education at Academic Medical Centers: Using a SWOT Analysis to Develop and Implement Programming.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Health care is increasingly being provided by interprofessional teams. Academic medical centers (AMCs) need to offer educational experiences for trainees to work on these teams. Few resources exist to guide educational leaders in developing and implementing these experiences to meet the unique needs of their AMC. A commonly used planning tool is the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, which can help organizations identify issues and develop strategies that overcome barriers to program implementation.

Methods

This workshop focuses on teaching participants to use a SWOT analysis to develop interprofessional learning activities. The workshop contains both a didactic component and an experiential component. The workshop was offered as a 60-minute webinar and a 120-minute in-person presentation. The additional hour during the in-person presentation was used for experiential learning activities. Eighty-four educators from a number of health professions attended the webinar, and approximately 50 medical educators attended the in-person presentation.

Results

Participants reported satisfaction with the workshop and found its content met stated learning objectives. Participants believed they gained both the knowledge to develop a strategic plan to implement interprofessional educational programming and the ability to apply this knowledge at their AMC. Participants reported that their confidence in using strategic planning increased due to workshop participation.

Discussion

This workshop represents a first step in helping educational leaders learn and use strategies to develop and implement interprofessional educational programming unique to their AMC. This programming is important for training future health care providers to work on interprofessional health care teams.

SUBMITTER: Topor DR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6342375 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Interprofessional Health Care Education at Academic Medical Centers: Using a SWOT Analysis to Develop and Implement Programming.

Topor David R DR Dickey Chandlee C Stonestreet Laura L Wendt Judith J Woolley Adam A Budson Andrew A

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources 20181019

<h4>Introduction</h4>Health care is increasingly being provided by interprofessional teams. Academic medical centers (AMCs) need to offer educational experiences for trainees to work on these teams. Few resources exist to guide educational leaders in developing and implementing these experiences to meet the unique needs of their AMC. A commonly used planning tool is the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, which can help organizations identify issues and develop str ...[more]

PMID: 30800966

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAcademic Medical Centers (AMCs) must simultaneously serve different purposes: Delivery of high quality healthcare services to patients, as the main mission, supported by other core missions such as academic activities, i.e., researching, teaching and tutoring, while maintaining solvency. This study aims to develop a methodology for constructing models evaluating the academic value provided by AMCs and implementing it at the largest AMC in Israel.MethodsThirty five practiced educators and researchers, academic experts, faculty members and executives, all employed by a metropolitan 1500-bed AMC, were involved in developing academic quality indicators. First, an initial list of AMCs' academic quality indicators was drafted, using a literature review and consulting scholars. Afterwards, additional data and preferences were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews, complemented by a three-round Delphi Panel. Finally, the methodology for constructing a model evaluating the academic value provided by the AMC was developed.ResultsThe composite academic quality indicators methodology consists of nine indicators (relative weight in parentheses): 'Scientific Publications Value' (18.7%), 'Completed Studies' (13.5%), 'Authors Value' (13.0%), 'Residents Quality' (11.3%), 'Competitive Grants Budget' (10.2%), 'Academic Training' (8.7%), 'Academic Positions' (8.3%), 'Number of Studies' (8.3%) and 'Academic Supervision' (8.0%). These indicators were grouped into three core categories: 'Education', 'Research' and 'Publications', having almost the same importance on a scale from zero to one (0-1), i.e., 0.363, 0.320, and 0.317, respectively. The results demonstrated a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach-alpha range: 0.79-0.86).ConclusionsWe have found a gap in the ability to measure academic value provided by AMCs. The main contribution of this research is the development of methodology for constructing evaluation models for AMCs academic performance. Further studies are needed to further test the validity and reliability of the proposed methodology at other sites.

Project description:Background: Demographic change and the medical imperative to accompany patients at all times and also in the case of illness leading to death require good basic knowledge of palliative care in large parts of the medical profession. Palliative care has been introduced into undergraduate medical education as a compulsory subject: "interdisciplinary subject 13 palliative care" (Q13). While course concepts for Q13 have already been positively evaluated, assessment of the consolidation and practical relevance of the knowledge taught is lacking. Methods: Assessment of the consolidation of the learning content from Q13 after the practical year (the "practical year" is the sixth and final year of undergraduate medical education in Germany) by means of a survey with a proven questionnaire and integrated qualitative free-text analysis of a cohort of medical students (n=176) who had already participated in an evaluation before and after Q13. Results: The response rate was 96% after Q13 and 45% after the practical year (PY). Teaching was predominantly perceived as more helpful than the PY (p<0.001). Compared to the status after Q13, students rated themselves as less competent after the PY in all areas surveyed, including drug-based pain therapy (p=0.0386). The certainty in informing patients about the incurability of the disease also decreased significantly after the PY (p=0.0117), although the preparation in Q13 was positively highlighted. Conclusion: The knowledge acquired in Q13 could not be anchored in the PY. On the contrary, after initial practical experiences, the students found it challenging to conduct conversations in cases of serious illness and to deal with their own uncertainty in the care of seriously ill patients. Structural factors regarding palliative care in the PY, as well as intrinsic motives of students, such as prior knowledge or motivation to learn, should be analyzed to identify ways to close the gap between theoretical and practical training in general palliative care. To generate samples that are sufficiently representative, future studies on teaching should be easily accessible to students and consider attractive forms of evaluation including electronic methods and social media.

Dataset Information

Interprofessional Health Care Education at Academic Medical Centers: Using a SWOT Analysis to Develop and Implement Programming.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Interprofessional Health Care Education at Academic Medical Centers: Using a SWOT Analysis to Develop and Implement Programming.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure