Dataset Information

Dehydration: A Multidisciplinary Case-Based Discussion for First-Year Medical Students.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

As many medical school curricula shift to integrated learning of multiple basic science topics as well as clinical concepts, there is an increasing need for instructional materials that incorporate multiple topics yet are targeted to the knowledge basis of first-year medical students. This interactive case-based session for first-year medical students centers on the clinical presentation and initial evaluation of a patient experiencing dehydration after running a marathon in a high-altitude city.

Methods

After completion of assigned out-of-class preparation, students followed the patient from a healthy state to moderate dehydration over the course of two 2-hour class sessions. Throughout discussion of the case, students answered questions requiring them to integrate elements of cell biology, biochemistry, physiology, and clinical reasoning with minimal faculty involvement. The learning activity was administered at University of Illinois College of Medicine campuses in both a small-group setting (10 students, one faculty facilitator) and a large-group format (55-90 students, multiple faculty facilitators). Following the activity, we assessed student perceptions of the design and implementation of the materials as well as effectiveness at meeting the learning goals.

Results

Of 198 students who participated in the case discussions on dehydration, the majority rated the case positively, indicated by a rating of good or excellent.

Discussion

This multidisciplinary case on dehydration can be used early in medical education to introduce students to clinical scenarios while learning fundamental science content. An integrated approach to medical content and versatility with regard to class size make this case a valuable teaching tool.

SUBMITTER: Berrocal Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6342389 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionRecently, stories depicting social injustices and inequities have gripped the US, leading to protests and other demonstrations of student activism. In response to current events, students at Weill Cornell Medical College identified the need for more diversity inclusion components in the newly developed medical school curriculum. Thus, we developed a student-initiated, student-run elective, Community Perspectives in Medicine, which provides a forum for first-year medical students to interact, and have open discussions, with members of communities most impacted by social and health inequities.MethodsDuring five weekly 2-hour sessions, representatives of different community-based organizations (CBOs) speak with 15 first-year medical students. Invited CBOs represent diverse populations, including LGBT, chronic illness, disabilities, religion, and immigrant health. For each session's first hour, a second-year student facilitates a semistructured interview of the CBO guests focusing on health disparities within their community, challenges experienced with the medical system, and what they wish doctors did differently. Students are encouraged to ask questions, often resulting in a rich dialogue. The session's second part is a debriefing by the student facilitator over a relaxed dinner (without CBO guests).ResultsFourteen of the16 enrolled students attended all five sessions and completed the course evaluation. Satisfaction with the course was high, as 93% of students enrolled rated the course as excellent. The course format, content, and diversity of speakers were rated as excellent by 79%, 86%, and 93%, respectively. Similarly, 71% of students believed there to be excellent applicability to medical practice, and 100% of students thought the timing during first year was excellent.DiscussionWe emphasize the importance of a partnership between CBOs and medical students, thus increasing students' cultural awareness as well as formally involving traditionally disenfranchised communities in medical education. Our project's unique format of safe-space discussion forums and session debriefings enhances critical thinking. Though used with multiple CBOs as an elective, our model can be easily adapted for one session on a specific health disparity.