Dataset Information

Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device.

ABSTRACT: The relationship between the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) position and pump thrombosis has been reported. However, further clinical implications of device position are unknown. This study aimed to investigate optimal device position for better left ventricular (LV) unloading and patient prognosis. Patients undergoing a ramp test with right heart catheterization after HeartMate II LVAD implantation were enrolled to this study. Device position was quantified from the chest X-ray obtained at the time of the ramp test: (1) inflow cannula angle relative to horizontal line, (2) pump angle relative to spine, (3) pump depth, (4) angle between inflow cannula and pump, and (5) angle between pump and outflow graft. LV unloading was assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at set LVAD speed. Fifty-four patients (60 years old and 34 male [63%]) were enrolled. Nobody experienced device malfunction during the study period. Increased LV unloading (i.e., lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) was associated with a narrower inflow cannula angle relative to horizontal line. Inflow cannula angle <75° was associated with higher 1 year heart failure readmission-free survival rate (p < 0.05, hazards ratio 7.56 [95% confidence interval 2.32-24.7]). In conclusion, HeartMate II LVAD inflow cannula position was associated with LV unloading and patient prognosis. Prospective studies to ensure optimal device positioning and target better clinical outcomes are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Imamura T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6342671 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May/Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Imamura Teruhiko T Nguyen Ann A Chung Ben B Rodgers Daniel D Sarswat Nitasha N Kim Gene G Raikhelkar Jayant J Adatya Sirtaz S Ota Takeyoshi T Song Tae T Juricek Colleen C Estep Jerry D JD Burkhoff Daniel D Jeevanandam Valluvan V Sayer Gabriel G Uriel Nir N

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) 20190501 4

The relationship between the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) position and pump thrombosis has been reported. However, further clinical implications of device position are unknown. This study aimed to investigate optimal device position for better left ventricular (LV) unloading and patient prognosis. Patients undergoing a ramp test with right heart catheterization after HeartMate II LVAD implantation were enrolled to this study. Device position was quantified from the chest X- ...[more]

PMID: 29933250

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (Abbott, Inc, Chicago, Ill) is a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal implantable pump used to treat patients with chronic heart failure. The MOMENTUM (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3) trial demonstrated that patients treated with the HM3 experienced reduced need for reoperation for LVAD replacement compared with a control group receiving an axial flow design, Heartmate II (Abbott, Inc). However, there are few reports of using HM3 as the replacement pump in patients who already are supported by a durable LVAD and experience a device-related complication necessitating replacement.MethodsAn institutional LVAD database was used to identify 19 consecutive patients who underwent pump replacement to HM3 (group 1) versus 85 consecutive control patients who underwent pump replacement to either Heartmate II or HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) (group 2), at a single institution from January 2010 to August 2018. Patient baseline characteristic and outcomes were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. The primary endpoint was a composite of freedom from death or need for another replacement surgery.ResultsThere was no difference between the groups in heart failure etiology, indication for replacement, as well as the average days on the previous pump or the type of previous pump. The HM3 group did have a significantly greater body mass index (37 vs 31.6 P = .01), a greater number of previous LVAD implants (36.8% vs 5.9%, had 2 previous LVADs, P < .001), and a greater number of previous sternotomies (31.6% vs 7.1%, had 3 previous sternotomies, P = .001). No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative adverse event rates. With regards to the primary endpoint, the patients with HM3 replacements (group 1) versus group 2 experienced significantly greater freedom from either death or need for another replacement during the follow-up period (P = .039). During follow-up, there were no thrombosis events for the patients who received replacement with HM3.ConclusionsLVAD replacement with HM3 can be performed safely and may be considered as the pump of choice in patients requiring LVAD replacement.

Project description:IntroductionAlthough anticoagulation therapy is mandated after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), postoperative bleedings and reoperations occur relatively frequently and are associated with worse outcomes. We evaluated the use of a conservative postoperative anticoagulation protocol in patients implanted with a HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD.MethodsIn a single-centre retrospective analysis of postoperative outcomes after HM3 LVAD implantation, a standard (old) anticoagulation protocol (i.e. early, full-dose anticoagulation with low-molecular weight heparin and overlapping vitamin K antagonist) was compared with a new conservative anticoagulation protocol (i.e. slow initiation of vitamin K antagonists without overlapping heparin). Main outcomes were changes in international normalised ratio (INR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), bleeding and/or tamponade events requiring reoperation, length of stay and adverse events.ResultsIn total, 73 patients (48 in old vs 25 in new protocol group) were evaluated. Mean age was 56 years (standard deviation 13) and most patients (78%) were males. Changes in INR and LDH in the first 14 days were similar in both groups (p = 0.50 and p = 0.997 for interaction, respectively). Number of bleeding/tamponade events requiring reoperation was lower in the new than in the old protocol group (4% vs 33%, p = 0.005). Postoperative 30-day mortality was similar, and we observed no thromboembolic events. Median (25th-75th percentiles) total length of postoperative hospital stay (27 (25-41) vs 21 (19-27) days, p < 0.001) and length of intensive care unit stay (5 (2-9) vs 2 (2-5) days, p = 0.022) were significantly shorter in the new protocol group.ConclusionThese retrospective data suggest that conservative slow initiation of anticoagulation therapy after HM3 LVAD implantation is associated with less bleeding/tamponade events requiring reoperation, a similar safety profile and a shorter duration of stay than the currently advised standard anticoagulation protocol.

Dataset Information

Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Publications

Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets