Dataset Information

Value of radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

ABSTRACT: To determine the value of radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy for stage II and III TESCC. We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for all cases of stage II-III TESCC. Patients were grouped as those receiving pre- or postoperative radiotherapy plus esophagectomy and those receiving esophagectomy alone. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the groups. Among the 3292 patients, multimodality treatments (pre- or postoperative radiotherapy plus surgery) were more effective than surgery alone (5-year, OS: 17.3% vs 7.9%; P < 0.001; CSS: 51.8% vs 34.9%; P < 0.001). Among the patients receiving multimodality treatments, multivariate analyses revealed stage to be the most significant prognostic factor for OS (II vs III, HR, 0.726; P < 0.001), but the sequence of radiotherapy and surgery was only of the marginal significance (pre- vs postoperative, HR, 0.875; P = 0.093). Preoperative radiotherapy provided significantly better survival than postoperative radiotherapy in stage III disease (5-year, OS: 13.0% vs 11.0%, P < 0.04; CSS: 49.2% vs 31.7%, P < 0.003), but not in stage II disease (5-year OS: 23.5% vs 21.0%, P = 0.519; CSS: 62.0% vs 53.4%, P = 0.075). Radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy provides better outcomes than esophagectomy alone for in stage II-III TESCC. Preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery appears to be the optimal treatment strategy in stage III TESCC.

SUBMITTER: Yu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6346254 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Value of radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Yu Jing J Ouyang Wen W Li Yi Y Hu Jing J Xu Yu Y Wei Yongchang Y Liao Zhengkai Z Liu Yu Y Zhang Junhong J Xie Conghua C

Cancer medicine 20181218 1

To determine the value of radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy for stage II and III TESCC. We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for all cases of stage II-III TESCC. Patients were grouped as those receiving pre- or postoperative radiotherapy plus esophagectomy and those receiving esophagectomy alone. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the groups. Among the 3292 patients, multimodality treatments (pre- or posto ...[more]

PMID: 30561117

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the eighth most common cancer worldwide with a 5-year survival rate of less than 25%. Here we report the incidence, risk factors and treatment options that are available currently, and moving into the future. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database made available by the National Cancer Institute in the USA. Specifically we extracted data from the years 2004 - 2015. Results:In total we identified 23,804 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and 13,919 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Males were at an increased risk of developing both types of esophageal cancer when compared to females. Most cases of adenocarcinoma were diagnosed as poorly differentiated grade III (42%), and most cases of squamous cell carcinoma were diagnosed as moderately differentiated grade II (39.5%). The most common stage of presentation for both adenocarcinoma (36.9%) and squamous cell (26.8%) carcinoma was stage IV. The worst outcomes for adenocarcinoma were noted with grade III tumors (hazard ratio (HR): 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44 - 1.68, P value: < 0.01), stage IV tumors (HR: 3.58, 95% CI: 3.33 - 3.85, P value: < 0.01) and those not treated with surgery (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 2.44 - 2.65, P value: < 0.01). For squamous cell carcinoma, the worst outcomes were noted with grade III tumors (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.23 - 1.49, P value: < 0.01), stage IV tumors (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.94 - 2.32, P value: <0.01). Conclusions:The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the USA is steadily on the rise. Conversely, the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma has been continually declining. While white males had an increased incidence of both types of esophageal cancer, a higher proportion of African Americans suffered from squamous cell carcinoma. Despite the wide spread use of proton pump inhibitors, adenocarcinoma continues to be a major public health concern.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Several studies have reported that the triangulating stapling method decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Our previous randomized controlled trial, however, could not confirm the superiority of the triangulating stapling (TS) method over the circular stapling (CS) method in terms of postoperative anastomotic stricture rate. Recently, the functional end-to-end stapling (FEES) method for cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy was developed, and lower anastomotic stricture rates with FEES have been reported than for our previously experienced anastomotic methods. To investigate the optimal anastomotic method, we now compare the TS method with the FEES method for cervical anastomosis regarding decrease in anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. METHODS:This is a randomized, single-center clinical trial designed to examine the superiority of the FEES method over the TS method for esophageal cancer patients. The primary endpoint is reduction of anastomotic stricture of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis within 12?months after esophagectomy. Secondary endpoints include overall postoperative morbidity within the first 12?months after esophagectomy, incidence of anastomotic leakage, aspiration pneumonia, or reflux esophagitis, and quality of life assessment as measured by the FACT-E at 12?months after esophagectomy. The incidence rate of anastomotic stricture of the TS method was 20% and this rate of the FEES method was estimated to be 4% in our preliminary study. We calculated sample size with a beta error of 0.20 and an alpha error of 0.05. We have been enrolling 125 patients in this trial to either the TS group or the FEES group since January 2017. DISCUSSION:This study should help to define the optimal anastomotic method for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. The FEES method, if proven to be superior to the TS method, can be implemented routinely for esophageal cancer patients with gastric-conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION:University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry ( UMIN 000025632 ). Registered on 13 January 2017.

Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of preoperative radiotherapy (PrORT) on the overall survival (OS) of patients with stage ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node metastasis (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer.MethodsA total of 1390 patients with stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The efficacy of PrORT combined with surgery was compared with that of surgery alone on OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of patients who received (n = 239) and did not receive (n = 1151) PrORT. We compared the OS of the 2 groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank were used to compare the OS between the 2 groups test before and after PSM and to analyse subgroups of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma.ResultsIn whole group analysis before PSM, the median OS was superior in the PrORT group than in the surgery alone group (44.0 [34.4-56.6] vs 39.0 [34.5-43.5] months). There was a significant difference in OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.819; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.677-0.991; P = 0.029]. Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was found in OS between the 2 groups after PSM (HR: 0.856; 95% CI: 0.654-1.122; P = 0.260). Among subgroup analysis of the SCC group before PSM revealed that patients who received PrORT had significantly higher median OS than those who did not receive PrORT (52.0 [40.0-NA] vs 27.0 [22.0-32.0] months; HR: 0.591, 95% CI: 0.442-0.792, P = 0.000) and the differences in OS existed after PSM (P = 0.043). However, no significant difference was found in OS before and after matching in the adenocarcinoma group (P = 0.827 and P = 0.801, respectively).ConclusionsPrORT demonstrated an OS benefit for patients with stage N2 lung SCC; however, further prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm this finding.

Dataset Information

Value of radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Publications

Value of radiotherapy in addition to esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure