Dataset Information

Comparison of a chymase inhibitor and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) in a novel peritoneal adhesion model in rats.

ABSTRACT: Adhesion formation that occurred after alkali-induced injury of the cecum was used as a novel adhesion model in rats, and it was compared with that of a common adhesion model after abrading the cecum. Using the novel adhesion model, inhibition of adhesion formation by a chymase inhibitor, Suc-Val-Pro-PheP(OPh)2, and by sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) was evaluated, and their mechanisms were assessed. The degree of adhesion formation was more severe and more stable in the alkali-induced injury model than in the abrasion-induced injury model. Both the chymase inhibitor and Seprafilm showed significant attenuation of the degree of adhesion 14 days after alkali-induced injury. Chymase activity in the cecum was significantly increased after alkali-induced injury, but it was significantly attenuated by the chymase inhibitor and Seprafilm. Myeloperoxidase and transforming-growth factor (TGF)-? levels were significantly increased after alkali-induced injury, but they were attenuated by both the chymase inhibitor and Seprafilm. At the level of the adhesions, the numbers of both chymase-positive cells and TGF-?-positive cells were significantly increased, but their numbers were reduced by the chymase inhibitor and Seprafilm. In conclusion, a chymase inhibitor attenuated the degree of adhesions to the same degree as Seprafilm in a novel peritoneal adhesion model that was more severe and more stable than the common adhesion model, and not only the chymase inhibitor, but also Seprafilm reduced the chymase increase at the adhesions.

SUBMITTER: Ozeki M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6347210 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of a chymase inhibitor and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) in a novel peritoneal adhesion model in rats.

Ozeki Maiko M Jin Denan D Miyaoka Yuta Y Masubuchi Shinsuke S Hirokawa Fumitoshi F Hayashi Michihiro M Takai Shinji S Uchiyama Kazuhisa K

PloS one 20190125 1

Adhesion formation that occurred after alkali-induced injury of the cecum was used as a novel adhesion model in rats, and it was compared with that of a common adhesion model after abrading the cecum. Using the novel adhesion model, inhibition of adhesion formation by a chymase inhibitor, Suc-Val-Pro-PheP(OPh)2, and by sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) was evaluated, and their mechanisms were assessed. The degree of adhesion formation was more severe and more stable in the al ...[more]

PMID: 30682159

Similar Datasets

Project description:The rising cesarean birth rate has drawn attention to risks associated with repeat cesarean birth. Prevention of adhesions with adhesion barriers has been promoted as a way to decrease operative difficulty. However, robust data demonstrating effectiveness of such interventions are lacking.We report data from a multicenter trial designed to evaluate the short-term safety and effectiveness of a modified sodium hyaluronic acid (HA)-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) absorbable adhesion barrier for reduction of adhesions following cesarean delivery.Patients who underwent primary or repeat cesarean delivery were included in this multicenter, single-blinded (patient), randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into either HA-CMC (N = 380) or no treatment (N = 373). No other modifications to their treatment were part of the protocol. Short-term safety data were collected following randomization. The location and density of adhesions (primary outcome) were assessed at their subsequent delivery using a validated tool, which can also be used to derive an adhesion score that ranges from 0-12.No differences in baseline characteristics, postoperative course, or incidence of complications between the groups following randomization were noted. Eighty patients from the HA-CMC group and 92 controls returned for subsequent deliveries. Adhesions in any location were reported in 75.6% of the HA-CMC group and 75.9% of the controls (P = .99). There was no significant difference in the median adhesion score; 2 (range 0-10) for the HA-CMC group vs 2 (range 0-8) for the control group (P = .65). One third of the HA-CMC patients met the definition for severe adhesions (adhesion score >4) compared to 15.5% in the control group (P = .052). There were no significant differences in the time from incision to delivery (P = .56). Uterine dehiscence in the next pregnancy was reported in 2 patients in HA-CMC group vs 1 in the control group (P = .60).Although we did not identify any short-term safety concerns, HA-CMC adhesion barrier applied at cesarean delivery did not reduce adhesion formation at the subsequent cesarean delivery.

Project description:BackgroundIntra-peritoneal adhesions are frequent following abdominal surgery and are the most common cause of small bowel obstructions. A hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) film adhesion barrier has been shown to reduce adhesion formation in abdominal surgery. An HA/CMC powder formulation was developed for application during laparoscopic procedures.MethodsThis was an exploratory, prospective, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, Phase IIIb, multicentre study conducted at 15 hospitals in France to assess the safety of HA/CMC powder versus no adhesion barrier following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Subjects ≥18 years of age who were scheduled for colorectal laparoscopy (Mangram contamination class I‒III) within 8 weeks of selection were eligible, regardless of aetiology. Participants were randomised 1:1 to the HA/CMC powder or no adhesion barrier group using a centralised randomisation list. Patients assigned to HA/CMC powder received a single application of 1 to 10 g on adhesion-prone areas. In the no adhesion barrier group, no adhesion barrier or placebo was applied. The primary safety assessments were the incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and surgical site infections (SSIs) for 30 days following surgery. Between-group comparisons were made using Fisher's exact test.ResultsOf those randomised to the HA/CMC powder (n = 105) or no adhesion barrier (n = 104) groups, one patient in each group discontinued prior to the study end (one death in each group). Adverse events were more frequent in the HA/CMC powder group versus the no adhesion barrier group (63% vs. 39%; P <0.001), as were serious adverse events (28% vs. 11%; P <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the HA/CMC powder group and the no adhesion barrier group in SSIs (21% vs. 14%; P = 0.216) and serious SSIs (12% vs. 9%; P = 0.38), or in the most frequent serious SSIs of pelvic abscess (5% and 2%; significance not tested), anastomotic fistula (3% and 4%), and peritonitis (2% and 3%).ConclusionsThis exploratory study found significantly higher rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the HA/CMC powder group compared with the no adhesion barrier group in laparoscopic colorectal resection.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00813397. Registered 19 December 2008.

Project description:BackgroundLimiting treatment to those recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon Clinical Practice Guidelines has been suggested to decrease costs by 45% in the year prior to total knee arthroplasty, but this only focuses on expenditures leading up to, but not including, the surgery and not the entire episode of care. We evaluated the treatment costs following knee osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis and determined whether these are different for patients who use intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) and/or knee arthroplasty.MethodsClaims data from a large commercial database containing de-identified data of more than 100 million patients with continuous coverage from 2012 to 2016 was used to evaluate the cumulative cost of care for over 2 million de-identified members with knee OA over a 4.5-year period between 2011 and 2015. Median cumulative costs were then stratified for patients with or without HA and/or knee arthroplasty.ResultsKnee OA treatment costs for 1,567,024 patients over the 4.5-year period was $6.60 billion (mean $4210/patient) as calculated by the authors. HA and knee arthroplasty accounted for 3.0 and 61.5% of the overall costs, respectively. For patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, a spike in median costs occurred sooner for patients without HA use (around the 5- to 6-month time point) compared to patients treated with HA (around the 16- to 17-month time point).ConclusionsNon-arthroplasty therapies, as calculated by the authors, accounted for about one third of the costs in treating knee OA in our cohort. Although some have theorized that limiting the use of HA may reduce the costs of OA treatment, HA only comprised a small fraction (3%) of the overall costs. Among patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, those treated with HA experienced elevated costs from the surgery later than those without HA, which reflects their longer time to undergoing knee arthroplasty. The ability to delay or avoid knee arthroplasty altogether can have a substantial impact on the cost to the healthcare system.

Dataset Information

Comparison of a chymase inhibitor and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) in a novel peritoneal adhesion model in rats.

Publications

Comparison of a chymase inhibitor and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) in a novel peritoneal adhesion model in rats.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets