Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.


ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT).

Design

Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Participants

One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc.

Methods

Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years.

Main outcome measures

Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria.

Results

Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%).

Conclusions

We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.

SUBMITTER: Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6348023 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.

Donahue Sean P SP   Chandler Danielle L DL   Holmes Jonathan M JM   Arthur Brian W BW   Paysse Evelyn A EA   Wallace David K DK   Petersen David B DB   Melia B Michele BM   Kraker Raymond T RT   Miller Aaron M AM  

Ophthalmology 20180903 2


<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT).<h4>Design</h4>Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.<h4>Participants</h4>One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5630122 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11192914 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3376299 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10722733 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4962984 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6707272 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5861632 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7794258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8853472 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7544045 | biostudies-literature