Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT). DESIGN:Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS:One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc. METHODS:Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria. RESULTS:Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%). CONCLUSIONS:We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.

SUBMITTER: Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6348023 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.

Donahue Sean P SP   Chandler Danielle L DL   Holmes Jonathan M JM   Arthur Brian W BW   Paysse Evelyn A EA   Wallace David K DK   Petersen David B DB   Melia B Michele BM   Kraker Raymond T RT   Miller Aaron M AM  

Ophthalmology 20180903 2


<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT).<h4>Design</h4>Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.<h4>Participants</h4>One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5630122 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3376299 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10722733 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4962984 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6707272 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5861632 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7794258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7544045 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5476252 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8437222 | biostudies-literature