Dataset Information

Capturing complexity of the diffusion-weighted MR signal decay.

ABSTRACT: Diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) is a key component of clinical radiology. When analyzing diffusion-weighted images, radiologists often seek to infer microscopic tissue structure through measurements of the diffusion coefficient, D0 (mm2/s). This multi-scale problem is framed by the creation of diffusion models of signal decay based on physical laws, histological structure, and biophysical constraints. The purpose of this paper is to simplify the model building process by focusing on the observed decay in the effective diffusion coefficient as a function of diffusion weighting (b-value), D(b), that is often observed in complex biological tissues. We call this approach the varying diffusion curvature (VDC) model. Since this is a heuristic model, the exact functional form of this decay is not important, so here we examine a simple exponential function, D(b)?=?D0exp(-bD1), where D0 and D1 capture aspects of hindered and restricted diffusion, respectively. As an example of the potential of the VDC model, we applied it to dMRI data collected from normal and diseased human brain tissue using Stejskal-Tanner diffusion gradient pulses. In order to illustrate the connection between D0 and D1 and the sub-voxel structure we also analyzed dMRI data from families of Sephadex beads selected with increasing tortuosity. Finally, we applied the VDC model to dMRI simulations of nested muscle fiber phantoms whose permeability, atrophy, and fiber size distribution could be changed. These results demonstrate that the VDC model is sensitive to sub-voxel tissue structure and composition (porosity, tortuosity, and permeability), hence can capture tissue complexity in a manner that could be easily applied in clinical dMRI.

SUBMITTER: Magin RL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6348133 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Capturing complexity of the diffusion-weighted MR signal decay.

Magin Richard L RL Karaman M Muge MM Hall Matt G MG Zhu Wenzhen W Zhou Xiaohong Joe XJ

Magnetic resonance imaging 20181009

Diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) is a key component of clinical radiology. When analyzing diffusion-weighted images, radiologists often seek to infer microscopic tissue structure through measurements of the diffusion coefficient, D<sub>0</sub> (mm<sup>2</sup>/s). This multi-scale problem is framed by the creation of diffusion models of signal decay based on physical laws, histological structure, and biophysical constraints. The purpose of this paper is to simplify the model building process by focu ...[more]

PMID: 30314665

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo quantitatively compare the potential of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the grading of gliomas.Materials and methodsThis study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Both diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging were performed in 69 patients with pathologically proven gliomas by using a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit. An isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true ADC, pseudo-ADC, and perfusion fraction were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a biexponential model. A water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and distributed diffusion coefficient were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a stretched exponential model. Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis were calculated from diffusion kurtosis images. All values were compared between high-grade and low-grade gliomas by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman rank correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluations.ResultsADC, true ADC, perfusion fraction, water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index, distributed diffusion coefficient, and mean diffusivity values were significantly lower in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 109, 56, 129, 6, 206, and 229, respectively; P < .05). Pseudo-ADC and mean kurtosis values were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 98 and 8, respectively; P < .05). Both water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.993) and mean kurtosis (AUC = 0.991) had significantly greater AUC values than ADC (AUC = 0.866), mean diffusivity (AUC = 0.722), and fractional anisotropy (AUC = 0.500) in the differentiation of low-grade and high-grade gliomas (P < .05).ConclusionWater molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and mean kurtosis values may provide additional information and improve the grading of gliomas compared with conventional diffusion parameters.

Project description:Purpose To assess the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimates in extracranial soft-tissue diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging across a wide range of imaging protocols and patient populations. Materials and Methods Nine prospective patient studies and one prospective volunteer study, performed between 2006 and 2016 with research ethics committee approval and written informed consent from each subject, were included in this single-institution study. A total of 141 tumors and healthy organs were imaged twice (interval between repeated examinations, 45 minutes to 10 days, depending the on study) to assess the repeatability of median and mean ADC estimates. The Levene test was used to determine whether ADC repeatability differed between studies. The Pearson linear correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between coefficient of variation (CoV) and the year the study started, study size, and volumes of tumors and healthy organs. The repeatability of ADC estimates from small, medium, and large tumors and healthy organs was assessed irrespective of study, and the Levene test was used to determine whether ADC repeatability differed between these groups. Results CoV aggregated across all studies was 4.1% (range for each study, 1.7%-6.5%). No correlation was observed between CoV and the year the study started or study size. CoV was weakly correlated with volume (r = -0.5, P = .1). Repeatability was significantly different between small, medium, and large tumors (P < .05), with the lowest CoV (2.6%) for large tumors. There was a significant difference in repeatability between studies-a difference that did not persist after the study with the largest tumors was excluded. Conclusion ADC is a robust imaging metric with excellent repeatability in extracranial soft tissues across a wide range of tumor sites, sizes, patient populations, and imaging protocol variations. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:PurposeTo retrospectively determine the accuracy of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for identifying cancer in the prostate peripheral zone (PZ) and to assess the accuracy of tumor volume measurements made with T2-weighted imaging and combined T2-weighted and DW MR imaging by using surgical pathologic examination as the reference standard.Materials and methodsThe institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this HIPAA-compliant study. Forty-two patients underwent endorectal MR at 1.5 T before undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and had at least one PZ tumor larger than 0.1 cm(3) at surgical pathologic examination. On T2-weighted images, an experienced radiologist outlined suspected PZ tumors. Two apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff values were identified by using the Youden index and published literature. Image cluster analysis was performed on voxels within the suspected tumor regions. Associations between volume measurements from imaging and from pathologic examination were assessed by using concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs). The sensitivity and specificity of ADCs for identifying malignant PZ voxels were calculated.ResultsIn identifying malignant voxels, respective ADC cutoff values of 0.0014 and 0.0016 mm(2)/sec yielded sensitivity of 82% and 95% and specificity of 85% and 65%, respectively. Sixty PZ cancer lesions larger than 0.1 cm(3) were found at pathologic examination; 43 were detected by the radiologist. CCCs between imaging and pathologic tumor volume measurements were 0.36 for T2-weighted imaging, and 0.46 and 0.60 for combined T2-weighted and DW MR imaging with ADC cutoffs of 0.0014 and 0.0016 mm(2)/sec, respectively; the CCC of combined T2-weighted and DW MR imaging (ADC cutoff, 0.0016 mm(2)/sec) was significantly higher (P = .006) than that of T2-weighted imaging alone.ConclusionAdding DW MR to T2-weighted imaging can significantly improve the accuracy of prostate PZ tumor volume measurement.Supplemental materialhttp://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/252/2/449/DC1.

Dataset Information

Capturing complexity of the diffusion-weighted MR signal decay.

Publications

Capturing complexity of the diffusion-weighted MR signal decay.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets