Dataset Information

Circulating inflammation signature predicts overall survival and relapse-free survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a highly heterogeneous disease from a clinical, molecular, and immunological perspective. Current predictive models rely primarily in tissue based genetic analysis, which not always correlate with inflammatory response. Here we evaluated the role of a circulating inflammatory signature as a prognostic marker in mCRC.

Methods

Two hundred eleven newly diagnosed patients with mCRC were enrolled in the study. One hundred twenty-one patients had unresectable metastases, whereas ninety patients had potentially resectable liver metastases at presentation. Analysis of miR-21, IL-6, and IL-8 in the plasma of peripheral blood was performed at baseline. Patients with high circulating levels of ≥2 of the three inflammation markers (miR-21, IL-6, and IL-8) were considered to have the "Inflammation phenotype-positive CISIG".

Results

Positive CISIG was found in 39/90 (43%) and 50/121 (45%) patients in the resectable and unresectable cohort, respectively. In the resectable population the median relapse-free survival was 18.4 compared to 31.4 months (p = 0.001 HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.2-3.67) for positive vs. negative CISIG. In contrast, the individual components were not significant. In the same population the median overall survival was 46.2 compared to 66.0 months (p = 0.0003, HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.26-5.27) for positive vs. negative CISIG, but not significant for the individual components. In the unresectable population, the median overall survival was 13.5 compared to 25.0 months (p = 0.0008, HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.46-4.22) for positive vs. negative CISIG. IL-6 was independently prognostic with overall survival of 16.2 compared to 27.0 months (p = 0.004, HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.24-3.11) for high vs. low IL-6, but not the other components. Using a Cox regression model, we demonstrated that CISIG is an independent predictive marker of survival in patients with unresectable disease (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2, 2.8, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In two different cohorts, we demonstrated that CISIG is a strong prognostic factor of relapse-free and overall survival of patients with mCRC. Based on these data, analysis of circulating inflammatory signaling can be complimentary to traditional molecular testing.

SUBMITTER: Varkaris A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6353894 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification can modify long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), thereby affecting the tumorigenesis and progression of tumors. However, the underlying role of m6A-modified lncRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains largely unknown. Therefore, our aim was to assess the prognostic value of m6A-modified lncRNAs in CRC patients. The gene expression and clinicopathological data of CRC were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the m6A-modified lncRNAs. Consensus clustering was conducted to identify molecular subtypes of CRC, and the clinical significance of molecular subtypes was identified. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis (LASSO) was applied to establish a risk signature. Finally, a prognostic nomogram with risk score and clinicopathological variables was established. In total, 29 m6A-modified lncRNAs were identified as prognostic lncRNAs. Two molecular clusters were identified and significant differences were found with respect to clinicopathological features and prognosis. Cluster1 is associated with poor overall survival (OS), down-regulation of Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, lower immune score, and less immune cell infiltration. Then, an m6A-modified lncRNA signature for predicting OS was constructed in the TCGA training cohort. The signature demonstrated favorable prediction performance in both training and validation sets. Compared with low-risk patients, patients with high risk showed worse clinical outcomes, lower immune scores, and downregulated PD-L1 expression. Further analysis indicated that the signature was an independent prognostic indicator, and then a prognostic nomogram based on risk score, tumor location, and tumor stage was established. Our study identified a seven m6A-modified lncRNA signature and established a prognostic nomogram that reliably predicts OS in CRC. These findings may improve the understanding of m6A modifications in CRC and provide insights into the prognosis and treatment strategy of CRC.

Project description:BackgroundIncreasing evidence shows that dysregulated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can serve as potential biomarkers for cancer prognosis. However, lncRNA signatures, as potential prognostic biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), have been seldom reported.MethodsBased on our previous transcriptome RNA sequencing analysis from 15 paired ESCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues, we selected 10 lncRNAs with high score rank and characterized the expression of those lncRNAs, by qRT-PCR, in 138 ESCC and paired adjacent normal samples. These 138 patients were divided randomly into training (n = 77) and test (n = 59) groups. A prognostic signature of lncRNAs was identified in the training group and validated in the test group and in an independent cohort (n = 119). Multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated the independence of the signature in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) prediction. GO and KEGG pathway analysis, combined with cell transwell and proliferation assays, are applied to explore the function of the three lncRNAs.ResultsA novel three-lncRNA signature, comprised of RP11-366H4.1.1 (ENSG00000248370), LINC00460 (ENSG00000233532) and AC093850.2 (ENSG00000230838), was identified. The signature classified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with different overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). For the training group, median OS: 23.1 months vs. 39.1 months, P < 0.001; median DFS: 15.2 months vs. 33.3 months, P < 0.001. For the test group, median OS: 23 months vs. 59 months, P < 0.001; median DFS: 16.4 months vs. 50.8 months, P < 0.001. For the independent cohort, median OS: 22.4 months vs. 60.4 months, P < 0.001). The signature indicates that patients in the high-risk group show poor OS and DFS, whereas patients with a low-risk group show significantly better outcome. The independence of the signature was validated by multivariable Cox regression analysis. GO and KEGG pathway analysis for 588 protein-coding genes-associated with the three lncRNAs indicated that the three lncRNAs were involved in tumorigenesis. In vitro assays further demonstrated that the three lncRNAs promoted the migration and proliferation of ESCC cells.ConclusionsThe three-lncRNA signature is a novel and potential predictor of OS and DFS for patients with ESCC.