Dataset Information

Performance of RGM Medium for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Respiratory Specimens from Non-Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

ABSTRACT: A new selective medium for rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM medium) was evaluated on respiratory specimens from non-cystic fibrosis patients and compared to the mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) system and Middlebrook 7H11 agar for the isolation of all nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). A total of 203 mucolyzed respiratory specimens collected from 163 patients were inoculated on RGM medium and incubated at both 30°C (RGM30) and 35°C (RGM35) over a 28-day period. N-Acetyl-l-cysteine-sodium hydroxide (NALC-NaOH)-decontaminated specimens were inoculated into MGIT and Middlebrook 7H11 agar and incubated at 35°C for 42?days. NTM were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) or gene sequencing. A total of 133 NTM isolates were recovered overall from 101 (49.8%) specimens collected from 85 (52.1%) patients by a combination of all culture methods. The sensitivity of RGM30 for the recovery of NTM was significantly higher than that of either the MGIT system (76.7% versus 59.4%; P?=?0.01) or Middlebrook 7H11 agar (76.7% versus 47.4%; P?=?0.0001) alone, but it was not significantly different from that of an acid-fast bacillus culture (AFC) which includes both MGIT and Middlebrook 7H11 agar (76.7% versus 63.9%; P?=?0.0647). RGM35 had significantly lower sensitivity than the MGIT system (49.6% versus 59.4%; P?=?0.0367) and AFC (49.6% versus 63.9%; P?=?0.0023). RGM medium was highly effective at inhibiting the growth of nonmycobacterial organisms in the respiratory specimens, with breakthrough contamination rates of 5.4% and 4.4% for RGM30 and RGM35, respectively.

SUBMITTER: Rotcheewaphan S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6355514 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Performance of RGM Medium for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Respiratory Specimens from Non-Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Rotcheewaphan Suwatchareeporn S Odusanya Oluwadamilola E OE Henderson Christina M CM Stephenson Dominic D Olivier Kenneth N KN Perry John D JD Zelazny Adrian M AM

Journal of clinical microbiology 20190130 2

A new selective medium for rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM medium) was evaluated on respiratory specimens from non-cystic fibrosis patients and compared to the mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) system and Middlebrook 7H11 agar for the isolation of all nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). A total of 203 mucolyzed respiratory specimens collected from 163 patients were inoculated on RGM medium and incubated at both 30°C (RGM30) and 35°C (RGM35) over a 28-day period. <i>N</i>-Acetyl-l-cyste ...[more]

PMID: 30487305

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale: Healthcare-associated transmission of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) among people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) has been investigated at CF centers worldwide, with conflicting conclusions. We investigated transmission at the Colorado Adult CF Program. Objectives: To systematically investigate healthcare-associated transmission and/or acquisition of NTM to determine similarity among respiratory and environmental isolates, and to compare home residence watershed mapping among pwCF having genetically similar NTM isolates. Methods: Whole-genome sequencing of NTM isolates from 80 pwCF was conducted to identify genetically similar isolate clusters (⩽30 SNP differences). Epidemiology, comparison of respiratory and environmental isolates, and home residence watershed mapping were analyzed. Measurements and Main Results: Whole-genome sequencing analysis revealed 11 clusters of NTM [6 Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies (ssp.) abscessus, 1 M. abscessus ssp. massiliense, 2 Mycobacterium avium, and 2 Mycobacterium intracellulare] among pwCF. Epidemiologic investigation demonstrated opportunities for healthcare-associated transmission in two M. abscessus and two M. avium clusters. Respiratory and healthcare environmental isolate comparisons revealed no genetic similarity. Individuals comprising one M. abscessus cluster, with no plausible healthcare-associated transmission, resided in the same watershed. Conclusions: This study suggests healthcare-associated transmission of M. abscessus is rare and includes a report of potential healthcare-associated transmission of M. avium among pwCF. One M. abscessus cluster possibly had common acquisition arising from residing in the same watershed. The presence of genetically similar isolates is insufficient to demonstrate healthcare-associated NTM transmission. Standardizing epidemiologic investigation, combined with environmental sampling and watershed analysis, will improve understanding of the frequency and nature of healthcare-associated NTM transmission among pwCF.

Project description:BackgroundNontuberculous mycobacteria are mycobacteria, other than those in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and are commonly found in the environment. Nontuberculous mycobacteria species (most commonly Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus) are isolated from the respiratory tract of approximately 5% to 40% of individuals with cystic fibrosis; they can cause lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis leading to more a rapid decline in lung function and even death in certain circumstances. Although there are guidelines for the antimicrobial treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease, these recommendations are not specific for people with cystic fibrosis and it is not clear which antibiotic regimen may be the most effective in the treatment of these individuals. This is an update of a previous review.ObjectivesThe objective of our review was to compare antibiotic treatment to no antibiotic treatment, or to compare different combinations of antibiotic treatment, for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective was to assess the effect of treatment on lung function and pulmonary exacerbations and to quantify adverse events. The secondary objectives were to assess treatment effects on the amount of bacteria in the sputum, quality of life, mortality, nutritional parameters, hospitalizations and use of oral antibiotics.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and hand searching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last search: 02 September 2016.We also searched a register of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of last search: 03 November 2016.Selection criteriaAny randomized controlled trials comparing nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotics to no antibiotic treatment, as well as one nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotic regimen compared to another nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotic regimen, in individuals with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were not collected because in the one trial identified by the search, data specific to individuals with cystic fibrosis could not be obtained from the pharmaceutical company.Main resultsOne completed trial was identified by the searches, but data specific to individuals with cystic fibrosis could not be obtained from the pharmaceutical company.Authors' conclusionsThis review did not find any evidence for the effectiveness of different antimicrobial treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Until such evidence becomes available, it is reasonable for clinicians to follow published clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nodular or bronchiectatic pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex or Mycobacterium abscessus in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Project description:BackgroundNontuberculous mycobacteria are mycobacteria, other than those in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and are commonly found in the environment. Nontuberculous mycobacteria species (most commonly Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus) are isolated from the respiratory tract of approximately 5% to 40% of individuals with cystic fibrosis; they can cause lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis leading to more a rapid decline in lung function and even death in certain circumstances. Although there are guidelines for the antimicrobial treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease, these recommendations are not specific for people with cystic fibrosis and it is not clear which antibiotic regimen may be the most effective in the treatment of these individuals. This is an update of a previous review.ObjectivesThe objective of our review was to compare antibiotic treatment to no antibiotic treatment, or to compare different combinations of antibiotic treatment, for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective was to assess the effect of treatment on lung function and pulmonary exacerbations and to quantify adverse events. The secondary objectives were to assess treatment effects on the amount of bacteria in the sputum, quality of life, mortality, nutritional parameters, hospitalizations and use of oral antibiotics.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and hand searching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last search: 24 February 2020. We also searched a register of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of last search: 21 March 2019.Selection criteriaAny randomized controlled trials comparing nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotics to no antibiotic treatment, as well as one nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotic regimen compared to another nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotic regimen, in individuals with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were not collected because in the one trial identified by the search, data specific to individuals with cystic fibrosis could not be obtained from the pharmaceutical company.Main resultsOne completed trial was identified by the searches, but data specific to individuals with cystic fibrosis could not be obtained from the pharmaceutical company.Authors' conclusionsThis review did not find any evidence for the effectiveness of different antimicrobial treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Until such evidence becomes available, it is reasonable for clinicians to follow published clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nodular or bronchiectatic pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex or Mycobacterium abscessus in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Dataset Information

Performance of RGM Medium for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Respiratory Specimens from Non-Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Publications

Performance of RGM Medium for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Respiratory Specimens from Non-Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets