Dataset Information

Splicing modulation as novel therapeutic strategy against diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Therapeutic options for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) are limited to surgery and locoregional chemotherapy. Despite improvements in survival rates, patients eventually succumb to disease progression. We investigated splicing deregulation both as molecular prognostic factor and potential novel target in DMPM, while we tested modulators of SF3b complex for antitumor activity. METHODS:Tissue-microarrays of 64 DMPM specimens were subjected to immunohistochemical assessment of SF3B1 expression and correlation to clinical outcome. Two primary cell cultures were used for gene expression profiling and in vitro screening of SF3b modulators. Drug-induced splicing alterations affecting downstream cellular pathways were detected through RNA sequencing. Ultimately, we established bioluminescent orthotopic mouse models to test the efficacy of splicing modulation in vivo. RESULTS:Spliceosomal genes are differentially upregulated in DMPM cells compared to normal tissues and high expression of SF3B1 correlated with poor clinical outcome in univariate and multivariate analysis. SF3b modulators (Pladienolide-B, E7107, Meayamycin-B) showed potent cytotoxic activity in vitro with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range. Differential splicing analysis of Pladienolide-B-treated cells revealed abundant alterations of transcripts involved in cell cycle, apoptosis and other oncogenic pathways. This was validated by RT-PCR and functional assays. E7107 demonstrated remarkable in vivo antitumor efficacy, with significant improvement of survival rates compared to vehicle-treated controls. CONCLUSIONS:SF3B1 emerged as a novel potential prognostic factor in DMPM. Splicing modulators markedly impair cancer cell viability, resulting also in potent antitumor activity in vivo. Our data designate splicing as a promising therapeutic target in DMPM.

SUBMITTER: Sciarrillo R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6355829 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Splicing modulation as novel therapeutic strategy against diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Sciarrillo Rocco R Wojtuszkiewicz Anna A El Hassouni Btissame B Funel Niccola N Gandellini Paolo P Lagerweij Tonny T Buonamici Silvia S Blijlevens Maxime M Zeeuw van der Laan Eveline A EA Zaffaroni Nadia N Deraco Marcello M Kusamura Shigeki S Würdinger Tom T Peters Godefridus J GJ Molthoff Carla F M CFM Jansen Gerrit G Kaspers Gertjan J L GJL Cloos Jacqueline J Giovannetti Elisa E

EBioMedicine 20181220

<h4>Introduction</h4>Therapeutic options for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) are limited to surgery and locoregional chemotherapy. Despite improvements in survival rates, patients eventually succumb to disease progression. We investigated splicing deregulation both as molecular prognostic factor and potential novel target in DMPM, while we tested modulators of SF3b complex for antitumor activity.<h4>Methods</h4>Tissue-microarrays of 64 DMPM specimens were subjected to immunohist ...[more]

PMID: 30581150

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents a rare and clinically distinct entity among malignant mesotheliomas. Pembrolizumab has activity in diffuse pleural mesothelioma but limited data are available for DMPM; thus, DMPM-specific outcome data are needed.ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes after the initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in the treatment of adults with DMPM.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary care academic cancer centers (University of Pennsylvania Hospital Abramson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). All patients with DMPM treated between January 1, 2015, and September 1, 2019, were retrospectively identified and followed until January 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed between September 2021 and February 2022.ExposuresPembrolizumab (200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 21 days).Main outcomes and measuresMedian progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The best overall response was determined using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, version 1.1. The association of disease characteristics with partial response was evaluated using the Fisher exact test.ResultsThis study included 24 patients with DMPM who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Patients had a median age of 62 years (IQR, 52.4-70.6 years); 14 (58.3%) were women, 18 (75.0%) had epithelioid histology, and most (19 [79.2%]) were White. A total of 23 patients (95.8%) received systemic chemotherapy prior to pembrolizumab, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 0-6 lines). Of the 17 patients who underwent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, 6 (35.3%) had positive tumor PD-L1 expression (range, 1.0%-80.0%). Of the 19 evaluable patients, 4 (21.0%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 21.1% [95% CI, 6.1%-46.6%]), 10 (52.6%) had stable disease, and 5 (26.3%) had progressive disease (5 of 24 patients [20.8%] were lost to follow-up). There was no association between a partial response and the presence of a BAP1 alteration, PD-L1 positivity, or nonepithelioid histology. With a median follow-up of 29.2 (95% CI, 19.3 to not available [NA]) months, the median PFS was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.8-13.3) months and the median OS was 20.9 (95% CI, 10.0 to NA) months from pembrolizumab initiation. Three patients (12.5%) experienced PFS of more than 2 years. Among patients with nonepithelioid vs epithelioid histology, there was a numeric advantage in median PFS (11.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to NA] vs 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-8.8] months) and median OS (31.8 [95% CI, 8.3 to NA] vs 17.5 [95% CI, 10.0 to NA] months); however, this did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this retrospective dual-center cohort study of patients with DMPM suggest that pembrolizumab had clinical activity regardless of PD-L1 status or histology, although patients with nonepithelioid histology may have experienced additional clinical benefit. The partial response rate of 21.0% and median OS of 20.9 months in this cohort with 75.0% epithelioid histology warrants further investigation to identify those most likely to respond to immunotherapy.

Project description:BackgroundDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare variant of malignant mesothelioma, representing 10-15% of malignant mesothelioma cases. The preferred therapeutic approach is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) accompanied by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); the role of systemic chemotherapy is not well established. While some limited retrospective studies report worse outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, our institution has favored the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for symptom relief and surgical optimization. The aim of our study was to assess the outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared to those receiving adjuvant or no perioperative chemotherapy.Patients and methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of treatment-naïve, non-papillary DMPM patients seen at our institution between 1/1/2009 and 9/1/2019. We explored the effect of type of systemic therapy on clinical outcomes and estimated median overall survival (mOS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios (HR) calculated by Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate effect of the exposures on overall survival.Results47 patients were identified with DMPM (median age at diagnosis 61.2 years, 76.6% epithelioid histology, 74.5% white race, 55.3% known asbestos exposure). CRS was performed in 53.2% of patients (25/47); 76.0% of surgical patients received HIPEC (19/25). The majority received systemic chemotherapy (37/47, 78.7%); among patients receiving both CRS and chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common than adjuvant chemotherapy (12 neoadjuvant, 8 adjuvant). Overall mOS was 84.1 months. Among neoadjuvant patients, 10/12 underwent surgery, and 2 were lost to follow-up; the majority (9/10) had clinically stable or improved disease during the pre-operative period. There were numerical more issues with chemotherapy with the adjuvant patients (4/8: 2 switches in platinum agent, 2 patients stopped therapy) than with the neoadjuvant patients (2/10: 1 switch in platinum agent, 1 delay due to peri-procedural symptoms). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with worse mOS compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (mOS NR vs 95.1 mo, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18-4.5, p = 0.89).ConclusionsWhen used preferentially, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in DMPM patients was not associated with worse outcomes compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. It was well-tolerated and did not prevent surgical intervention.

Dataset Information

Splicing modulation as novel therapeutic strategy against diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Publications

Splicing modulation as novel therapeutic strategy against diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets