Dataset Information

Neuroprotective effects of PPAR? in retinopathy of type 1 diabetes.

ABSTRACT: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common neurovascular complication of type 1 diabetes. Current therapeutics target neovascularization characteristic of end-stage disease, but are associated with significant adverse effects. Targeting early events of DR such as neurodegeneration may lead to safer and more effective approaches to treatment. Two independent prospective clinical trials unexpectedly identified that the PPAR? agonist fenofibrate had unprecedented therapeutic effects in DR, but gave little insight into the physiological and molecular mechanisms of action. The objective of the present study was to evaluate potential neuroprotective effects of PPAR? in DR, and subsequently to identify the responsible mechanism of action. Here we reveal that activation of PPAR? had a robust protective effect on retinal function as shown by Optokinetic tracking in a rat model of type 1 diabetes, and also decreased retinal cell death, as demonstrated by a DNA fragmentation ELISA. Further, PPAR? ablation exacerbated diabetes-induced decline of visual function as demonstrated by ERG analysis. We further found that PPAR? improved mitochondrial efficiency in DR, and decreased ROS production and cell death in cultured retinal neurons. Oxidative stress biomarkers were elevated in diabetic Ppar?-/- mice, suggesting increased oxidative stress. Mitochondrially mediated apoptosis and oxidative stress secondary to mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to neurodegeneration in DR. Taken together, these findings identify a robust neuroprotective effect for PPAR? in DR, which may be due to improved mitochondrial function and subsequent alleviation of energetic deficits, oxidative stress and mitochondrially mediated apoptosis.

SUBMITTER: Pearsall EA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6361421 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neuroprotective effects of PPARα in retinopathy of type 1 diabetes.

Pearsall Elizabeth A EA Cheng Rui R Matsuzaki Satoshi S Zhou Kelu K Ding Lexi L Ahn Bumsoo B Kinter Michael M Humphries Kenneth M KM Quiambao Alexander B AB Farjo Rafal A RA Ma Jian-Xing JX

PloS one 20190204 2

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common neurovascular complication of type 1 diabetes. Current therapeutics target neovascularization characteristic of end-stage disease, but are associated with significant adverse effects. Targeting early events of DR such as neurodegeneration may lead to safer and more effective approaches to treatment. Two independent prospective clinical trials unexpectedly identified that the PPARα agonist fenofibrate had unprecedented therapeutic effects in DR, but gave litt ...[more]

PMID: 30716067

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:We investigated whether intensive glycemic control, combination therapy for dyslipidemia, and intensive blood-pressure control would limit the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes. Previous data suggest that these systemic factors may be important in the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy. METHODS:In a randomized trial, we enrolled 10,251 participants with type 2 diabetes who were at high risk for cardiovascular disease to receive either intensive or standard treatment for glycemia (target glycated hemoglobin level, <6.0% or 7.0 to 7.9%, respectively) and also for dyslipidemia (160 mg daily of fenofibrate plus simvastatin or placebo plus simvastatin) or for systolic blood-pressure control (target, <120 or <140 mm Hg). A subgroup of 2856 participants was evaluated for the effects of these interventions at 4 years on the progression of diabetic retinopathy by 3 or more steps on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Severity Scale (as assessed from seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs, with 17 possible steps and a higher number of steps indicating greater severity) or the development of diabetic retinopathy necessitating laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy. RESULTS:At 4 years, the rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy were 7.3% with intensive glycemia treatment, versus 10.4% with standard therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.87; P=0.003); 6.5% with fenofibrate for intensive dyslipidemia therapy, versus 10.2% with placebo (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.87; P=0.006); and 10.4% with intensive blood-pressure therapy, versus 8.8% with standard therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.79; P=0.29). CONCLUSIONS:Intensive glycemic control and intensive combination treatment of dyslipidemia, but not intensive blood-pressure control, reduced the rate of progression of diabetic retinopathy. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00000620 for the ACCORD study and NCT00542178 for the ACCORD Eye study.)

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine associations of microvascular and neuropathic complications of diabetes cross-sectionally and longitudinally in persons with long-term type 1 diabetes (T1D).Research design and methodsPersons receiving care for T1D in South Central Wisconsin were identified in 1979-1980 and examined approximately every 5 years. Associations between neuropathic and microvascular complications were examined at most prior visits, when information on several neuropathic complications was collected. Temporal relationships were examined by modeling incidence between examinations across the visits.ResultsAdjusting for duration of diabetes, glycated hemoglobin, and systolic blood pressure, the following were cross-sectionally associated with prevalent PDR (proliferative diabetic retinopathy): the presence of sensory neuropathy (SN) as reported at each Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) examination (odds ratio (OR) = 2.76, confidence interval (CI) = 1.71, 4.48) and the heartrate variability measures RMSD (square root of the mean of squared differences of successive RR intervals) (OR = 0.24, CI = 0.16, 0.37) and SDNN (standard deviation of successive RR intervals) (OR = 0.26, CI = 0.17, 0.39). Findings were similar for prevalent ME (macular edema) as assessed from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The presence of PDR (OR = 2.13, CI = 1.63, 2.78) and ME (OR = 2.36, CI = 1.66, 3.34) were both significantly associated with incident WESDR SN. WESDR SN was associated with incident PDR (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.09, 2.15) but not incident ME (OR = 1.31, CI = 0.92, 1.87).ConclusionsSensory neuropathy and heartrate variability were significantly associated with prevalent PDR and ME in people with long-term T1D. PDR and ME were significantly associated with incident sensory neuropathy, and sensory neuropathy was significantly associated with incident PDR. Studies using earliest detectable markers of microvascular and neurologic abnormalities are needed to determine which of the two systems 'fails' first. Such information might suggest a temporal sequence of diabetes complications.

Project description:BACKGROUND:In patients who have had type 1 diabetes for 5 years, current recommendations regarding screening for diabetic retinopathy include annual dilated retinal examinations to detect proliferative retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema, both of which require timely intervention to preserve vision. During 30 years of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its longitudinal follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, retinal photography was performed at intervals of 6 months to 4 years. METHODS:We used retinal photographs from the DCCT/EDIC study to develop a rational screening frequency for retinopathy. Markov modeling was used to determine the likelihood of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema in patients with various initial retinopathy levels (no retinopathy or mild, moderate, or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy). The models included recognized risk factors for progression of retinopathy. RESULTS:Overall, the probability of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was limited to approximately 5% between retinal screening examinations at 4 years among patients who had no retinopathy, 3 years among those with mild retinopathy, 6 months among those with moderate retinopathy, and 3 months among those with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. The risk of progression was also closely related to mean glycated hemoglobin levels. The risk of progression from no retinopathy to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was 1.0% over 5 years among patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6%, as compared with 4.3% over 3 years among patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 10%. Over a 20-year period, the frequency of eye examinations was 58% lower with our practical, evidence-based schedule than with routine annual examinations, which resulted in substantial cost savings. CONCLUSIONS:Our model for establishing an individualized schedule for retinopathy screening on the basis of the patient's current state of retinopathy and glycated hemoglobin level reduced the frequency of eye examinations without delaying the diagnosis of clinically significant disease. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; DCCT/EDIC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00360893 and NCT00360815 .).

Dataset Information

Neuroprotective effects of PPAR? in retinopathy of type 1 diabetes.

Publications

Neuroprotective effects of PPARα in retinopathy of type 1 diabetes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets