Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture: a clinical practice guideline.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Rochwerg B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6364256 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture: a clinical practice guideline.
Rochwerg Bram B Almenawer Saleh A SA Siemieniuk Reed A C RAC Vandvik Per Olav PO Agoritsas Thomas T Lytvyn Lyubov L Alhazzani Waleed W Archambault Patrick P D'Aragon Frederick F Farhoumand Pauline Darbellay PD Guyatt Gordon G Laake Jon Henrik JH Beltrán-Arroyave Claudia C McCredie Victoria V Price Amy A Chabot Christian C Zervakis Tracy T Badhiwala Jetan J St-Onge Maude M Szczeklik Wojciech W Møller Morten Hylander MH Lamontagne Francois F
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 20180522
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesAtraumatic needles are known to reduce complication rates of blind lumbar punctures (LP), however, their use in fluoroscopically guided LP is less studied. This study assessed the comparative difficulty of performing fluoroscopic lumbar puncture with atraumatic needles.MethodsSingle-centre retrospective case-control study comparing atraumatic and conventional or "cutting" needles using fluoroscopic time and radiation dose (Dose Area Product or DAP) as surrogate markers. Patients were assessed from two comparable eight-month periods before and after a policy change to primary use of atraumatic needles.Results105 procedures with a cutting needle were performed in the group prior to the policy change. Median fluoroscopy time was 48 sec and median DAP was 3.14. Of 102 procedures performed in the group after the policy change, 99 were performed with an atraumatic needle and three with a cutting needle after initial attempt with an atraumatic needle. Median fluoroscopy time was 41 sec and median DAP was 3.28. The mean number of attempts was 1.02 in the cutting needle group and 1.05 in the atraumatic needle group. There was no significant difference in median fluoroscopy time, median DAP, or mean number of attempts.ConclusionFluoroscopic screening time, DAP and mean number of attempts were not significantly increased with primary use of atraumatic needles for LP. Use of atraumatic needles should be considered in fluoroscopic LP given the lower complication rates.Advances in knowledgeThis study provides new data showing that the use of atraumatic needles does not increase the difficulty of fluoroscopically guided LP.
| S-EPMC10230379 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To compare the ease of use of atraumatic needles with standard needles for diagnostic lumbar puncture and the incidence of headache after their use. DESIGN:Double blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING:Investigation ward of a neurology unit in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS:116 patients requiring elective diagnostic lumbar puncture. INTERVENTIONS:Standardised protocol for lumbar puncture with 20 gauge atraumatic or standard needles. OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary end point was intention to treat analysis of incidence of moderate to severe headache, assessed at one week by telephone interview. Secondary end points were incidence of headache at one week analysed by needle type, ease of use by operator according to a visual analogue scale, incidence of backache, and failure rate of puncture. RESULTS:Valid outcome data were available for 97 of 101 patients randomised. Baseline characteristics were matched except for higher body mass index in the standard needle group. By an intention to treat analysis the absolute risk of moderate to severe headache with atraumatic needles was reduced by 26% (95% confidence interval 6% to 45%) compared with standard needles, but there was a non-significantly greater absolute risk of multiple attempts at lumbar puncture (14%, -4% to 32%). Higher body mass index was associated with an increased failure rate with atraumatic needles, but the reduced incidence of headache was maintained. The need for medical interventions was reduced by 20% (1% to 40%). CONCLUSIONS:Atraumatic needles significantly reduced the incidence of moderate to severe headache and the need for medical interventions after diagnostic lumbar punctures, but they were associated with a higher failure rate than standard needles.
| S-EPMC27505 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAtraumatic needles are proposed to lower complication rates after lumbar puncture (LP). Only a minority of physicians use such needles. Here we aimed to assess the impact of specific training in LP during clinical clerkship on the proportion of medical students using atraumatic needles.MethodsWe performed a case-control study comparing medical students undergoing clinical clerkship and students undergoing specific LP training. The 176 students of a class underwent training in LP just before beginning their clinical rotations. This training consisted of 45 minutes of theoretical training and a 90-minute practical session with a dummy. Twenty students were selected from the class at random, and their competence was assessed with a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), nine months after the specific training. These 20 cases were compared with 20 students randomly selected from a class of 180 students who had not undergone specific training in LP and were at the end of their clinical clerkship.ResultsWe found that 60% of the students with specific training and 25% of those with classic clinical training used an atraumatic needle during the OSCE (p = 0.025). The mean MCQ (/100) scores obtained were 57±15 and 60±15 for the specific and classic training groups, respectively (p = 0.35). Overall OSCE score was similar in the two groups (63.5±9.3 vs. 65.8±9.3; p = 0.20).ConclusionVery few practicing physicians use atraumatic needles, which limits the teaching of their use to medical students. Specific training durably increases the use of appropriate needles.
| S-EPMC6557568 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe lumbar puncture (LP) technique is widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. In recent years, the paramedian approach technique (PAT) has gained increasing interest due to its advantages over the conventional midline approach technique (MAT) that has been traditionally employed in clinical practice for LP. However, there have been inconsistent discussions regarding the efficacy of different LP techniques. Based on digital virtual human and computer simulation techniques, a new approach called computerised modified PAT (CMPAT) was proposed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to discuss a randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocol to investigate and compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a prospective, multicentre RCT. The study will recruit 84 patients aged 18-99 years who require LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). The primary outcome measure will be the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP. Secondary outcomes will include the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications. The measurement of these secondary outcomes will be taken during the procedure, as well as at specific time points: 30 min, 6 hours, 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the procedure. Pain levels will be assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval (2022YF052-01) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. The research findings will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at scientific conferences.Trial registration numberChiCTR2300067937.
| S-EPMC10882310 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6486021 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLumbar puncture (LP) is an invasive medical procedure that can be done by any doctor. Several simulation-based trainings have been built however the evaluations of the theoretical knowledge and the impact of the simulation-based training have never been performed in real life. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a LP training on the theoretical knowledge improvement and the performance of a LP in clinical practice.MethodsBefore and after medical students' training, theoretical knowledge and confidence level were assessed. Over a 6 months period, the impact of simulation training was evaluated by the success rate of students' first LP carried out in hospitalized patients and compared to the results of a no-training control.ResultsStudents' theoretical knowledge and confidence level showed significant improvement after simulation training on 115 students (p < 0.0001). The evaluation in real life based on 41 students showed that the success rate of the first LP in patients was higher in the LP simulation group compared to the control group (67% vs 14%, p = 0.0025). The technical assistance was also less frequently needed in the LP simulation group (19% vs 57%, respectively, p = 0.017). The rate of students who participated in this educational study was low.DiscussionSimulation-based teaching was an effective way to improve students' theoretical and practical knowledge. Whether this approach translates to other procedural skills in real clinical settings merits further study. The low participation rate in the study is due to the fact that students are not used to be included in educational studies and to the complexity of evaluation in routine clinical practice.
| S-EPMC7789333 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLumbar puncture (LP) remains an essential diagnostic procedure for neurological and infectious diseases. However, it remains a source of anxiety to patients and families. This research aimed to assess the impact of a newly developed educational simplified video about LP, in the parents' native language, that is tailored to their social background and beliefs and to assess whether it can facilitate their consent for the procedure.MethodsThis prospective, interventional study was conducted at the outpatient pediatric clinics at a teaching hospital. The conventional arm used verbal explanation about LP. The second method utilized a standardized video, having the same information as the conventional arm, with streaming of graphic depictions. Parents' knowledge and perceived LP risks were measured before and after the intervention.ResultsTwo hundred and one parents were enrolled, with no significant differences in the socio-demographic and baseline characteristics. Both verbal and video-based counseling were found to provide a statistically significant increase in knowledge scores, and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that knowledge gains for both groups were statistically significant (Verbal Explanation: W = 2693, n = 83, P < .001 and Video: W = 5538, n = 117, P < .001). However, the conventional verbal counseling resulted in more consistent gain of knowledge (SD = 14.5) as compared to the video group (SD = 18.94). The video group reported higher perceived risk (Mean 8.2, SD 3.59) than the verbal explanation group (Mean 7.12, SD 2.51). The less educated parents perceived LP procedure to be of significantly higher risk after watching the video (P < .001). It was found that 73.6% of persons with perceived intention to refuse LP changed their opinion after either of the counseling interventions, with significant opinion difference pre- and post-counseling intervention (P value .002).ConclusionsVideo education in parents' native language about LP is as effective as conventional verbal education for informed consent, with the additional advantage of reproducibility and more illustrations to give parents better insight. However, this video should be followed by direct interaction with parents to ensure their full understanding and address any further concerns.
| S-EPMC8144859 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A lumbar puncture is performed to obtain cerebral spinal fluid. It is implemented in the clinic on a routine basis to aid the diagnosis of neurologic diseases, such as dementia. This video will show the lumbar puncture procedure as routinely performed in the VUmc Alzheimer Center.
| S-EPMC5454130 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neuroinflammation is evident and one of the primary induced responses after central nervous system (CNS) injury, lumbar puncture and CNS surgery. In rare cases, complications could arise after the lumbar puncture or CNS surgery leading to inflammation, bleeding or other problems such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. The present dataset describes the occurrence of such a condition after the dura breakage or postoperative complication leading to the development of neuroinflammation in the adult Wistar rats. Therefore, objective of the study is to report such a rare condition and detect the most reliable glial proteins upregulated 2-3 weeks after the lumbar puncture which may help the neuroscience community to a better understanding their cause of action. In response to neuroinflammation, glial cells leak into the extracellular space, where they can be identified in the CSF or serum and may act as diagnostic biomarkers. Laminectomy was performed at the thoraco-lumbar (T12-L1) region and the dura was punctured. After that, the exposed part was covered with silica gel and adhesive followed by dental cement. The skin was closed using sterile sutures. After, the rats were given buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg, every 8 h for 3 days) and carprofen (5 mg/kg, once a day for 5 days) as analgesic and anti-inflammatory and baytril (5 mg/kg, once a day for 10 days) as antibiotic drugs. Note, the buprenorphine and lidocaine were also given before starting the procedure. After the laminectomy, the functional outcomes of the rats were tested (starting from the day of surgery to the last day) and the rats which were locomoting normally using all the limbs were included in the study. In case of any decompression, the functional outcomes showing any kind of laming or partial paralysis of hindlimbs were excluded from the study. Unexpected neuroinflammation has occurred 2-3 weeks after performing the given procedure. Data presented in the article implicate active microglia measured by using protein biomarker such as Iba-1 [1, 3] and astrocytes measured by using Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) [2, 3] and S100 (strongly targets S100B and weakly A1) [7, 8] in the CSF collected two-three weeks after the laminectomy and dura breakage from the adult rats. Later paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixed spinal cord slices were also collected from the animals and immunolabelled with the same biomarkers. Western blots were performed with the collected CSF which showed high expression of glial markers such as GFAP, Iba-1 and S100 which has shown to target S100B with no expression of A1 (or A2, play an important role in neuroprotection) astrocytes which have recently been shown to be produced by microglia at the site of injury [9]. However, S100B [10] and GFAP [2] are known to be adequately discharged by the distinct cells in stress conditions which seems to occur in the present report. In addition, the spinal slices immunolabelled with the same biomarkers also showed increased expression of glia. Cross-talk between microglia-astrocyte in CNS stress is crucial for the neurons to survive and function after the injury. Reactive microglia (shown by high Iba-1 expression) leading to microgliosis comprise the first line of defense to phagocytose the dead cells [11]. Astrocytes act as the second line of defense leading to a process known as astrogliosis and upregulate GFAP and S100B to limit the damage [12]. Further studies are needed to explain the molecular mechanism/s of different astrocytes release such as A2 and their interaction with microglia after the lumbar puncture.
| S-EPMC7820377 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Subcutaneous lidocaine injection and topical EMLA cream are both used to control lumbar puncture (LP) pain; however, local analgesia usage is not standardized. Methods We conducted a prospective, single-blinded, randomized-controlled crossover trial comparing the two modalities in reducing LP pain. Pediatric patients requiring serial LPs were randomly assigned to receive EMLA cream or lidocaine injection prior to LP. On the subsequent LP, analgesia was defaulted to the other agent. Pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale pre-procedure: 30 to 60 minutes post-LP, and 24 hours post-procedure. Results Ten patients were included in the analysis (median age: 5.5 years). Pain ratings at 1 and 24 hours post-LP did not differ between the two strategies ( p = 0.79). No adverse local reactions were reported for either agent. Conclusion Accordingly, both lidocaine and EMLA cream provided effective LP pain control.
| S-EPMC9771623 | biostudies-literature