Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Independent re-analysis of alleged mind-matter interaction in double-slit experimental data.


ABSTRACT: A two year long experimental dataset in which authors of Radin, et al., 2016 claim to find evidence of mind-matter interaction is independently re-analyzed. In this experiment, participants are asked to periodically shift their attention towards or away from a double-slit optical apparatus. Shifts in fringe visibility of the interference pattern are monitored and tested against the common sense null hypothesis that such shifts should not correlate with the participant's attention state. We propose a deeper analysis of the dataset, identifying all the necessary arbitrary pre-analysis choices one needs to make, and carefully assessing the results' robustness regarding these choices. Results are twofold. Firstly, even with a conservative correction for the multiple statistical tests the analysis calls for, we confirm the existence of significant although small anomalies in the direction predicted by the mind-matter interaction hypothesis. On the other hand, and unlike Radin, et al., 2016, we also report significant although even smaller anomalies in the control dataset. This leads us to conclude that this particular dataset does not provide strong evidence of mind-matter interaction, yet certainly contains inexplicable anomalies that should motivate replication attempts in highly controlled environments.

SUBMITTER: Tremblay N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6366771 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8211243 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7035345 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7116683 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC94581 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9511726 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7877746 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5769592 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6714546 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7656464 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6570510 | biostudies-literature