Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Which quadrant is less painful for intravitreal injection? A prospective study.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To evaluate the relationship between injection site and pain severity following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB). DESIGN:Prospective, randomized, four-armed, clinical trial. METHODS:The present study was a prospective, randomized, four-armed clinical trial, which included 1004 eyes from 1004 patients. Patients receiving IVB were randomly assigned into four groups: superotemporal (ST); superonasal (SN); inferotemporal (IT); and inferonasal (IN) injections. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain. Primary study variables were the relationship between pain severity and injection site, number of previous injections, age, sex, and indication for injection. Secondary variables included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes 1 month post IVB. RESULTS:Overall mean pain score was 2.86?±?2.2. Indications for injection were diabetic macular edema (84.1%), neovascular age-related macular degeneration (7.7%), and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (8.2%). The mean VAS scores in the SN, IN, ST, and IT groups were 1.5?±?1.7, 3?±?2.3, 4?±?2, and 3?±?2.1, respectively. Pain severity was significantly correlated with injection site (p?

SUBMITTER: Karimi S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6367313 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Which quadrant is less painful for intravitreal injection? A prospective study.

Karimi Saeed S   Mosavi Seyed Aliasghar SA   Jadidi Khosrow K   Nikkhah Homayoun H   Kheiri Bahareh B  

Eye (London, England) 20180910 2


<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the relationship between injection site and pain severity following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB).<h4>Design</h4>Prospective, randomized, four-armed, clinical trial.<h4>Methods</h4>The present study was a prospective, randomized, four-armed clinical trial, which included 1004 eyes from 1004 patients. Patients receiving IVB were randomly assigned into four groups: superotemporal (ST); superonasal (SN); inferotemporal (IT); and inferonasal (IN) injections.  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6440421 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6560891 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6439777 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8670887 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8197588 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3088562 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7152690 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10645462 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3983635 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9976099 | biostudies-literature