Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the prevalence and associated factors for personal, work-related and patient/client-related burnout in clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in academic medicine.

Design

Prevalence survey using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory.

Setting

Mid-size academic health centre.

Participants

Clinical providers (n=6489) and biomedical scientists (n=248) were invited to complete the survey. 1646 completed responses (response rate 24.4%) were analysed.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Prevalence estimates and adjusted ORs (AOR) were stratified for gender, age and professional category.

Results

Type of burnout varies across professional categories, with significant differences between clinicians and scientists. The prevalence of personal burnout was 52.7% (95%CI 50% to 55%), work-related burnout 47.5% (95%CI 45% to 49%) and patient/client-related burnout 20.3% (95%CI 18% to 22%). The prevalence of personal and work-related burnout was higher among women, while those aged 20-30 had a higher prevalence of all three burnout categories. Overall, clinical professionals had higher personal and work-related burnout, while biomedical scientists had higher client-related burnout. Accounting for the effects of gender and age, a significantly higher risk for personal burnout was found for physicians (AOR 1.64; 95%CI 1.3 to 2.1) and nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.03 to 2.2). Significantly higher odds of work-related burnout were found for nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.2 to 1.9) and residents (AOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.04 to 3.6). Basic scientists (AOR 10.0; 95%CI 5.7 to 17.6), physicians (AOR 2.8; 95%CI 1.9 to 4.1) and nurses (AOR 2.1; 95%CI 1.3 to 3.5) had higher odds of patient/client-related burnout.

Conclusions

Types of burnout are unevenly distributed in academic medical centres. Physicians have higher risk of personal and patient/client-related burnout, residents have higher risk of work-related burnout, basic scientists are at higher risk of client-related burnout and nurses have higher odds of all three types of burnout. Interventions addressing the problem of burnout in clinical environments may be inadequate to support biomedical scientists.

SUBMITTER: Messias E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6367953 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey.

Messias Erick E   Gathright Molly M MM   Freeman Emily S ES   Flynn Victoria V   Atkinson Timothy T   Thrush Carol R CR   Clardy James A JA   Thapa Purushottam P  

BMJ open 20190219 2


<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the prevalence and associated factors for personal, work-related and patient/client-related burnout in clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in academic medicine.<h4>Design</h4>Prevalence survey using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory.<h4>Setting</h4>Mid-size academic health centre.<h4>Participants</h4>Clinical providers (n=6489) and biomedical scientists (n=248) were invited to complete the survey. 1646 completed responses (response rate 24.4%) were anal  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11363640 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12456095 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12465423 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7470819 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12631093 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9517415 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7493511 | biostudies-literature