Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies.


ABSTRACT: AIMS:There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after 'recalibration', a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied. METHODS AND RESULTS:Using individual-participant data on 360?737 participants without CVD at baseline in 86 prospective studies from 22 countries, we compared the Framingham risk score (FRS), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), pooled cohort equations (PCE), and Reynolds risk score (RRS). We calculated measures of risk discrimination and calibration, and modelled clinical implications of initiating statin therapy in people judged to be at 'high' 10 year CVD risk. Original risk algorithms were recalibrated using the risk factor profile and CVD incidence of target populations. The four algorithms had similar risk discrimination. Before recalibration, FRS, SCORE, and PCE over-predicted CVD risk on average by 10%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, whereas RRS under-predicted by 10%. Original versions of algorithms classified 29-39% of individuals aged ?40?years as high risk. By contrast, recalibration reduced this proportion to 22-24% for every algorithm. We estimated that to prevent one CVD event, it would be necessary to initiate statin therapy in 44-51 such individuals using original algorithms, in contrast to 37-39 individuals with recalibrated algorithms. CONCLUSION:Before recalibration, the clinical performance of four widely used CVD risk algorithms varied substantially. By contrast, simple recalibration nearly equalized their performance and improved modelled targeting of preventive action to clinical need.

SUBMITTER: Pennells L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6374687 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies.

Pennells Lisa L   Kaptoge Stephen S   Wood Angela A   Sweeting Mike M   Zhao Xiaohui X   White Ian I   Burgess Stephen S   Willeit Peter P   Bolton Thomas T   Moons Karel G M KGM   van der Schouw Yvonne T YT   Selmer Randi R   Khaw Kay-Tee KT   Gudnason Vilmundur V   Assmann Gerd G   Amouyel Philippe P   Salomaa Veikko V   Kivimaki Mika M   Nordestgaard Børge G BG   Blaha Michael J MJ   Kuller Lewis H LH   Brenner Hermann H   Gillum Richard F RF   Meisinger Christa C   Ford Ian I   Knuiman Matthew W MW   Rosengren Annika A   Lawlor Debbie A DA   Völzke Henry H   Cooper Cyrus C   Marín Ibañez Alejandro A   Casiglia Edoardo E   Kauhanen Jussi J   Cooper Jackie A JA   Rodriguez Beatriz B   Sundström Johan J   Barrett-Connor Elizabeth E   Dankner Rachel R   Nietert Paul J PJ   Davidson Karina W KW   Wallace Robert B RB   Blazer Dan G DG   Björkelund Cecilia C   Donfrancesco Chiara C   Krumholz Harlan M HM   Nissinen Aulikki A   Davis Barry R BR   Coady Sean S   Whincup Peter H PH   Jørgensen Torben T   Ducimetiere Pierre P   Trevisan Maurizio M   Engström Gunnar G   Crespo Carlos J CJ   Meade Tom W TW   Visser Marjolein M   Kromhout Daan D   Kiechl Stefan S   Daimon Makoto M   Price Jackie F JF   Gómez de la Cámara Agustin A   Wouter Jukema J J   Lamarche Benoît B   Onat Altan A   Simons Leon A LA   Kavousi Maryam M   Ben-Shlomo Yoav Y   Gallacher John J   Dekker Jacqueline M JM   Arima Hisatomi H   Shara Nawar N   Tipping Robert W RW   Roussel Ronan R   Brunner Eric J EJ   Koenig Wolfgang W   Sakurai Masaru M   Pavlovic Jelena J   Gansevoort Ron T RT   Nagel Dorothea D   Goldbourt Uri U   Barr Elizabeth L M ELM   Palmieri Luigi L   Njølstad Inger I   Sato Shinichi S   Monique Verschuren W M WM   Varghese Cherian V CV   Graham Ian I   Onuma Oyere O   Greenland Philip P   Woodward Mark M   Ezzati Majid M   Psaty Bruce M BM   Sattar Naveed N   Jackson Rod R   Ridker Paul M PM   Cook Nancy R NR   D'Agostino Ralph B RB   Thompson Simon G SG   Danesh John J   Di Angelantonio Emanuele E  

European heart journal 20190201 7


<h4>Aims</h4>There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after 'recalibration', a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied.<h4>Methods and results</h4>Using individual-participant data on 360 737 participants without CVD at baseline in 86 prospective  ...[more]

Similar Datasets