Dataset Information

Supratotal resection in glioma: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Emerging evidence suggests survival benefit from resection beyond all MRI abnormalities present on T1-enhanced and T2‒fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) modalities in glioma (supratotal resection); however, the quality of evidence is unclear. We addressed this question via systematic review of the literature.

Methods

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried. Case studies, reviews or editorials, non-English, abstract-only, brain metastases, and descriptive works were excluded. All others were included.

Results

Three hundred and nine unique references yielded 41 studies for full-text review, with 7 included in the final analysis. Studies were mostly of Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Level 4 quality. A total of 88 patients underwent supratotal resection in a combined cohort of 492 patients (214 males and 278 females, age 18 to 82 years). Fifty-one supratotal resections were conducted on high-grade gliomas, and 37 on low-grade gliomas. Karnofsky performance status, overall survival, progression-free survival, neurological deficits postoperatively, and anaplastic transformation were the main measured outcomes. No randomized controlled trials were identified. Preliminary low-quality support was found for supratotal resection in increasing overall survival and progression-free survival for both low-grade and high-grade glioma.

Conclusion

The literature suggests insufficient evidence for carte blanche application of supratotal resection, particularly in lower-grade gliomas where neurological deficits can result in long-term disability. While the preliminary studies discussed here, containing data from only a few centers, have reported increased progression-free and overall survival, these claims require validation in prospective research studies involving larger patient populations with clearly defined appropriate outcome metrics in order to reduce potential bias.

SUBMITTER: de Leeuw CN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6374756 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Supratotal resection in glioma: a systematic review.

de Leeuw Charles N CN Vogelbaum Michael A MA

Neuro-oncology 20190201 2

<h4>Background</h4>Emerging evidence suggests survival benefit from resection beyond all MRI abnormalities present on T1-enhanced and T2‒fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) modalities in glioma (supratotal resection); however, the quality of evidence is unclear. We addressed this question via systematic review of the literature.<h4>Methods</h4>EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried. Case studies, reviews or editorials, non-English, abstract-only, brain metasta ...[more]

PMID: 30321384

Similar Datasets

Project description:Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are optimally treated with up-front maximal safe surgical resection, typically defined as maximizing the extent of tumor resection while minimizing neurologic risks of surgery. Supratotal resection of LGG may improve outcomes beyond gross total resection by removing tumor cells invading beyond the tumor border as defined on MRI. However, the evidence regarding supratotal resection of LGG, in terms of impact on clinical outcomes, such as overall survival and neurologic morbidities, remains unclear. Authors independently searched the PubMed, Medline, Ovid, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar databases for studies evaluating overall survival, time to progression, seizure outcomes, and postoperative neurologic and medical complications of supratotal resection/FLAIRectomy of WHO-defined LGGs. Papers in languages other than English, lacking full-text availability, evaluating supratotal resection of WHO-defined high-grade gliomas only, and nonhuman studies were excluded. After literature search, reference screening, and initial exclusions, 65 studies were screened for relevancy, of which 23 were evaluated via full-text review, and 10 were ultimately included in the final evidence review. Studies were evaluated for quality using the MINORS criteria. After data extraction, a total of 1301 LGG patients were included in the analysis, with 377 (29.0%) undergoing supratotal resection. The main measured outcomes were extent of resection, pre- and postoperative neurological deficits, seizure control, adjuvant treatment, neuropsychological outcomes, ability to return to work, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Overall, low- to moderate-quality evidence was supportive of aggressive, functional boundary-based resection of LGGs due to improvements in progression-free survival and seizure control. The published literature provides a moderate amount of low-quality evidence supporting supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries for low-grade glioma. Among patients included in this analysis, the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits was low, and nearly all patients recovered within 3 to 6 months after surgery. Notably, the surgical centers represented in this analysis have significant experience in glioma surgery in general, and supratotal resection specifically. In this setting, supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries appears to be appropriate for both symptomatic and asymptomatic low-grade glioma patients. Larger clinical studies are needed to better define the role of supratotal resection in LGG.

Project description:ObjectiveGliomas arising from the insular cortex can be epileptogenic, with a significant proportion of patients having medically refractory epilepsy. The impact of surgery on seizure control for such tumors is not well established. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate seizure outcomes after resection of insular gliomas using a meta-analysis and institutional experience.MethodsThree databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched for published studies of seizure outcomes after insular glioma resection from database inception to March 27, 2021. In addition, data were retrospectively collected on all adults (age > 17 years) who had undergone insular glioma resection between June 1997 and June 2015 at the authors' institution. Primary outcome measures were seizure freedom rates at 1 year and the last follow-up. Secondary outcome measures consisted of persistent postoperative neurological deficit beyond 90 days, mortality, and tumor progression or recurrence.ResultsEight studies reporting on 453 patients who had undergone 460 operations were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean age of the patients was 42 years. The pooled percentages of patients with extents of resection (EORs) ≥ 90%, 70%-89%, and < 70% were 55%, 33%, and 11%, respectively. The pooled seizure freedom rate at 1 year was 73% for Engel class IA and 78% for Engel class I. The pooled seizure freedom rate at the last follow-up was 60% for Engel class IA and 79% for Engel class I. The pooled percentage of persistent neurological deficit beyond 90 days was 3%. At the authors' institution, 109 patients had undergone resection of insular glioma. A greater EOR was the only significant independent predictor of seizure freedom after surgery (HR 0.290, p = 0.017). The optimal threshold for seizure freedom corresponded to an EOR of 81%. Patients with an EOR > 81% had a significantly higher seizure freedom rate (OR 2.16, p = 0.048).ConclusionsMaximal safe resection can be performed with minimal surgical morbidity to achieve favorable seizure freedom rates in both the short and long term. When gross-total resection is not possible, an EOR > 81% confers the greatest sensitivity and specificity for achieving seizure freedom. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42021249404 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Project description:BackgroundOptimal extent of surgical resection (EOR) of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) remains uncertain in the elderly given the unclear benefits and potentially higher rates of mortality and morbidity associated with more extensive degrees of resection.MethodsWe undertook a meta-analysis according to a predefined protocol and systematically searched literature databases for reports about HGG EOR. Elderly patients (≥60 y) undergoing biopsy, subtotal resection (STR), and gross total resection (GTR) were compared for the outcome measures of overall survival (OS), postoperative karnofsky performance status (KPS), progression-free survival (PFS), mortality, and morbidity. Treatment effects as pooled estimates, mean differences (MDs), or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using random effects modeling.ResultsA total of 12 607 participants from 34 studies met eligibility criteria, including our current cohort of 211 patients. When comparing overall resection (of any extent) with biopsy, in favor of the resection group were OS (MD 3.88 mo, 95% CI: 2.14-5.62, P < .001), postoperative KPS (MD 10.4, 95% CI: 6.58-14.22, P < .001), PFS (MD 2.44 mo, 95% CI: 1.45-3.43, P < .001), mortality (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.61, P = .002), and morbidity (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.46-1.46, P = .514) . GTR was significantly superior to STR in terms of OS (MD 3.77 mo, 95% CI: 2.26-5.29, P < .001), postoperative KPS (MD 4.91, 95% CI: 0.91-8.92, P = .016), and PFS (MD 2.21 mo, 95% CI: 1.13-3.3, P < .001) with no difference in mortality (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.05-5.71, P = .600) or morbidity (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18-1.49, P = .223).ConclusionsOur findings suggest an upward improvement in survival time, functional recovery, and tumor recurrence rate associated with increasing extents of safe resection. These benefits did not result in higher rates of mortality or morbidity if considered in conjunction with known established safety measures when managing elderly patients harboring HGGs.

Dataset Information

Supratotal resection in glioma: a systematic review.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Supratotal resection in glioma: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets