Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Half-Dose Versus Full-Dose Alteplase for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Recent evidence suggests that half-dose thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism may provide similar efficacy with reduced bleeding risk compared with full-dose therapy, but comparative studies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of half-dose versus full-dose alteplase for treatment of pulmonary embolism. DESIGN:A retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes in patients receiving half-dose (50?mg) versus full-dose (100?mg) alteplase for pulmonary embolism. We used propensity score matching and sensitivity analyses to address confounding and hospital-level clustering. SETTING:Data from 420 hospitals obtained from the Premier Healthcare Database between January 2010 and December 2014. SUBJECTS:Adult critically ill patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with IV alteplase therapy. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:This study included 3,768 patients: 699 (18.6%) in the half-dose and 3,069 (81.4%) in the full-dose group. At baseline, patients receiving half-dose alteplase required vasopressor therapy (23.3% vs 39.4%; p < 0.01) and invasive ventilation (14.3% vs 28.5%; p < 0.01) less often, compared with full dose. After propensity matching (n = 548 per group), half-dose alteplase was associated with increased treatment escalation (53.8% vs 41.4%; p < 0.01), driven mostly by secondary thrombolysis (25.9% vs 7.3%; p < 0.01) and catheter thrombus fragmentation (14.2% vs 3.8%; p < 0.01). Hospital mortality was similar (13% vs 15%; p = 0.3). There was no difference in cerebral hemorrhage (0.5% vs 0.4%; p = 0.67), gastrointestinal bleeding (1.6% vs 1.6%; p = 0.99), acute blood loss anemia (6.9% vs 4.6%; p = 0.11), use of blood products (p > 0.05 for all), or documented fibrinolytic adverse events (2.6% vs 2.8%; p = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS:Compared with full-dose alteplase, half-dose was associated with similar mortality and rates of major bleeding. Treatment escalation occurred more often in half-dose-treated patients. These results question whether half-dose alteplase provides similar efficacy with improved safety, and highlights the need for further study before use of half-dose alteplase therapy can be routinely recommended in patients with pulmonary embolism.

SUBMITTER: Kiser TH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6375681 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Half-Dose Versus Full-Dose Alteplase for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.

Kiser Tyree H TH   Burnham Ellen L EL   Clark Brendan B   Ho P Michael PM   Allen Richard R RR   Moss Marc M   Vandivier R William RW  

Critical care medicine 20181001 10


<h4>Objectives</h4>Recent evidence suggests that half-dose thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism may provide similar efficacy with reduced bleeding risk compared with full-dose therapy, but comparative studies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of half-dose versus full-dose alteplase for treatment of pulmonary embolism.<h4>Design</h4>A retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes in patients receiving half-dose (50 mg) versus full-dose (100 mg) alteplase for pulmonary  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10831663 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5529318 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8607403 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6714714 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8370009 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9617477 | biostudies-literature
2008-07-01 | GSE6104 | GEO
| S-EPMC5884296 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10455162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7845079 | biostudies-literature