Dataset Information

Differences in Adherence Barriers to Inhaled Medicines between Japanese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Evaluated using the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) Questionnaire.

ABSTRACT: Objective This multicenter, cross-sectional, non-interventional trial aimed to investigate adherence barriers to inhaled medicines when compared with oral medicines in Japanese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Methods The self-reporting "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) questionnaire was administered for adherence barriers of inhaled and oral medicines to outpatients with regular clinic attendance. Results Patients with COPD and asthma reported different adherence barriers to inhaled medicines. Independent adherence barriers [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] to inhaled medicines relative to those for oral medicines among patients with COPD and asthma were those related to item Q8 [ "I know if I am reaching my health goals"; 2.49 (1.39-4.47); p=0.0022] and item Q2 [ "I run out of my medicine because I do not get refills on time"; 2.69 (1.26-5.75); p=0.0127], respectively. Among patients with poor adherence to only inhaled medicines, those with COPD and asthma recognized item Q3 [ "consuming alcohol and taking medicines"; 6.63 (1.27-34.7); p<0.05] and item Q1 [ "forget to take medicines only sometimes"; 4.29 (1.83-10.0); p<0.05], respectively, were recognized as independent adherence barriers to inhaled medicines. The total ASK-20 scores and total barrier counts in patients with poor adherence to inhaled medicines were significantly higher than in those without poor adherence among patients with asthma (p=0.0057) but not those with COPD (p>0.05). Conclusion These results will aid in personalizing education on adherence to inhaled medicines among patients with COPD and asthma.

SUBMITTER: Toyama T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6378151 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differences in Adherence Barriers to Inhaled Medicines between Japanese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Evaluated using the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) Questionnaire.

Toyama Takayuki T Kawayama Tomotaka T Kinoshita Takashi T Imamura Yohei Y Yoshida Makoto M Takahashi Koichiro K Fujii Kazuhiko K Higashimoto Ikkou I Hoshino Tomoaki T

Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) 20180912 2

Objective This multicenter, cross-sectional, non-interventional trial aimed to investigate adherence barriers to inhaled medicines when compared with oral medicines in Japanese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Methods The self-reporting "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) questionnaire was administered for adherence barriers of inhaled and oral medicines to outpatients with regular clinic attendance. Results Patients with COPD and asthma reported d ...[more]

PMID: 30210101

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo develop and validate a questionnaire for the investigation of non-adherence (NA) barriers in patients receiving intravitreal injection (IVT).DesignQuestionnaire development and cross-sectional patient survey combined with a retrospective medical chart review.ParticipantsGerman patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment via IVT.MethodsThe previously validated (indications: atrial fibrillation, human immunodeficiency virus, chronic inflammatory lung disease) Adherence Barriers Questionnaire (ABQ) was revised according to specifications of IVT, within the framework of an expert panel. The ABQ-IVT, which initially consisted of 24 items formulated as statements (4-point-Likert-scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"), was applied in a cross-sectional survey. Evaluation of the questionnaire included an assessment of internal consistency and factor analysis. The occurrence of potential barriers in the patient sample was evaluated using descriptive statistics. To identify patient subpopulations, hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using ABQ-IVT answers as predictors. Due to difficulties in capturing NA as an external criterion, the evaluation of the questionnaire was limited to its internal validity and reliability.Main outcome measuresPatients' answers to the ABQ-IVT questionnaire and interviews.ResultsOf 253 patients, 234 (92%) were able to complete the ABQ-IVT questionnaire. Within the reliability analysis, the ABQ-IVT was reduced to 17 items. The condensed questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78), and factor analysis showed no evidence for subscales of the questionnaire. Nearly half of the patients (49%) reported being affected by at least three different barriers. On average, a patient was affected by 3.1 barriers. The most frequently reported barriers were "Challenge due to time commitment of physician visits" (45% of the patients), "Depression" (29%) and "Travel and opportunity costs" (27%). Cluster analysis identified six patient subpopulations, each affected by different sets of barriers and differed regarding their patient characteristics.ConclusionsThe ABQ-IVT is a practical and reliable instrument for identifying patient-specific barriers to IVT treatment adherence. In practice, the questionnaire may be useful in assessing whether individual patients are at higher risk of NA due to specific adherence barriers. Aside from better awareness, this allows earlier interventions, though these still need to be validated. Patient subpopulations face different barriers and may, therefore, need distinct preventative care.

Project description:Introduction: Suboptimal self-management of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma patients is frequently observed in clinical practice and associated with poor asthma control. Driving factors for suboptimal self-management are complex and consist of a range of behavioral barriers (cognitive, affective and practical) with a considerable inter-individual variability. Identification of individual barriers facilitates the use of corresponding behavior change techniques and tailored care to improve asthma treatment outcomes. Objective: This study describes the development and validation of the 'Respiratory Adherence Care Enhancer' (RACE) questionnaire to identify individual barriers to self-management of ICS therapy in asthma patients. Methods: The development included: 1) an inventory of self-management barriers based on a literature review, 2) expert assessment on relevance and completeness of this set, linking these barriers to behavioral domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and 3) the formulation of corresponding questions assessing each of the barriers. A cross-sectional study was performed for validation. Primary care asthma patients were invited to fill out the RACE-questionnaire prior to a semi-structured telephonic interview as golden standard. Barriers detected from the questionnaire were compared to those mentioned in the interview. Results: The developed questionnaire is made up of 6 TDF-domains, covering 10 self-management barriers with 23 questions. For the validation 64 patients completed the questionnaire, of whom 61 patients were interviewed. Cronbach's alpha for the consistency of questions within the barriers ranged from 0.58 to 0.90. Optimal cut-off values for the presence of barriers were determined at a specificity between 67 and 92% with a sensitivity between 41 and 83%. Significant Areas Under the Receiver Operating Curves values were observed for 9 barriers with values between 0.69 and 0.86 (p-value <0.05), except for 'Knowledge of ICS medication' with an insignificant value of 0.53. Conclusion: The RACE-questionnaire yields adequate psychometric characteristics to identify individual barriers to self-management of ICS therapy in asthma patients, facilitating tailored care.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Despite substantial advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the last decades, non-adherence (NA) continues to be a major challenge in the real-life treatment. To meet this challenge, adherence-promoting interventions with a tailored approach towards patient-specific adherence barriers that are identified using a reliable and practicable questionnaire are needed. The aim of this investigation was to develop and validate a respective questionnaire (Adherence Barriers Questionnaire for HIV: ABQ-HIV), based on an earlier version of the ABQ. METHODS:The existing ABQ was discussed by an expert panel and revised according to the specifications of ART therapy for HIV patients. Initially, the ABQ-HIV consisted of 17 items formulated as statements (4-point-Likert-scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"). A higher score indicates a higher influence of a certain barrier on patient's perceptions. The ABQ-HIV was applied in a cross-sectional survey of German HIV patients. Evaluation of the questionnaire included an assessment of internal consistency as well as factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing the ABQ-HIV score with the degree of self-reported adherence measured by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8©). RESULTS:Three hundred seventy patients were able to be included in all validation analyses. The included patients had a mean age of 51.2?years, and 15.7% were female. The mean HIV infection time was 11.7?years, and the mean duration of treatment since first starting ART was 8.7?years. Twenty-five patients - excluded from all further analyses - were not able/willing to answer all ABQ-HIV questions. The results of the reliability analysis showed a Cronbach's ? of 0.708 for the initial 17-items in the ABQ-HIV draft. Two items were eliminated from the initial questionnaire, resulting in a Cronbach's ? of 0.720 and a split-half reliability of 0.724 (Spearman-Brown coefficient). Based on the reduced 15-item scale, the factor analysis resulted in three different components of the questionnaire. Component 1, with seven items, represents the unintentional adherence barriers. The second component, which contains five items, can be labelled as a subscale describing barriers associated with disease/treatment knowledge. Finally, three items, which can be summarized as intentional adherence barriers, show maximum loading in the third component. The score of the reduced 15-item ABQ-HIV scale, as well as the scores of the three subscales, correlated significantly with the MMAS score. All correlation coefficients were negative, indicating that higher burdens of adherence barriers measured by ABQ-HIV or its subscales were associated with a lower MMAS score and thus, with a lower adherence level. The ROC analysis using the MMAS low adherence classification as its state variable provided a cut-off for the ABQ-HIV scale of >?28 (sensitivity: 61.5%, specificity: 83.3%). In our sample, 85 patients (23.0%) reached a score of >?28 and appeared to face a high non-adherence risk. CONCLUSIONS:The ABQ-HIV is a practical, reliable, and valid instrument for identifying patient-specific barriers to adherence in the HIV treatment. It is also useful in identifying HIV patient subgroups, according to adherence barriers specific to these patients.

Dataset Information

Differences in Adherence Barriers to Inhaled Medicines between Japanese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Evaluated using the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) Questionnaire.

Publications

Differences in Adherence Barriers to Inhaled Medicines between Japanese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Evaluated using the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) Questionnaire.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure