Dataset Information

Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning.

ABSTRACT: When patterns are set during embryogenesis, it is expected that they are straightly established rather than subsequently modified. The patterning of the three mouse molars is, however, far from straight, likely as a result of mouse evolutionary history. The first-formed tooth signaling centers, called MS and R2, disappear before driving tooth formation and are thought to be vestiges of the premolars found in mouse ancestors. Moreover, the mature signaling center of the first molar (M1) is formed from the fusion of two signaling centers (R2 and early M1). Here, we report that broad activation of Edar expression precedes its spatial restriction to tooth signaling centers. This reveals a hidden two-step patterning process for tooth signaling centers, which was modeled with a single activator-inhibitor pair subject to reaction-diffusion (RD). The study of Edar expression also unveiled successive phases of signaling center formation, erasing, recovering, and fusion. Our model, in which R2 signaling center is not intrinsically defective but erased by the broad activation preceding M1 signaling center formation, predicted the surprising rescue of R2 in Edar mutant mice, where activation is reduced. The importance of this R2-M1 interaction was confirmed by ex vivo cultures showing that R2 is capable of forming a tooth. Finally, by introducing chemotaxis as a secondary process to RD, we recapitulated in silico different conditions in which R2 and M1 centers fuse or not. In conclusion, pattern formation in the mouse molar field relies on basic mechanisms whose dynamics produce embryonic patterns that are plastic objects rather than fixed end points.

SUBMITTER: Sadier A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6382175 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning.

Sadier Alexa A Twarogowska Monika M Steklikova Klara K Hayden Luke L Lambert Anne A Schneider Pascal P Laudet Vincent V Hovorakova Maria M Calvez Vincent V Calvez Vincent V Pantalacci Sophie S

PLoS biology 20190207 2

When patterns are set during embryogenesis, it is expected that they are straightly established rather than subsequently modified. The patterning of the three mouse molars is, however, far from straight, likely as a result of mouse evolutionary history. The first-formed tooth signaling centers, called MS and R2, disappear before driving tooth formation and are thought to be vestiges of the premolars found in mouse ancestors. Moreover, the mature signaling center of the first molar (M1) is formed ...[more]

PMID: 30730874

Similar Datasets

Project description:The dental abnormalities are the typical features of many ectodermal dysplasias along with congenital malformations of nails, skin, hair, and sweat glands. However, several reports of non-syndromic/isolated tooth agenesis have also been found in the literature. The characteristic features of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) comprise of hypodontia/oligodontia, along with hypohidrosis/anhidrosis, and hypotrichosis. Pathogenic variants in EDA, EDAR, EDARADD, and TRAF6, cause the phenotypic expression of HED. Genetic alterations in EDA and WNT10A cause particularly non-syndromic/isolated oligodontia. In the current project, we recruited 57 patients of 17 genetic pedigrees (A-Q) from different geographic regions of the world, including Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Syria. The molecular investigation of different syndromic and non-syndromic dental conditions, including hypodontia, oligodontia, generalized odontodysplasia, and dental crowding was carried out by using exome and Sanger sequencing. We have identified a novel missense variant (c.311G>A; p.Arg104His) in WNT10A in three oligodontia patients of family A, two novel sequence variants (c.207delinsTT, p.Gly70Trpfs*25 and c.1300T>G; p.Try434Gly) in EDAR in three patients of family B and four patients of family C, respectively. To better understand the structural and functional consequences of missense variants in WNT10A and EDAR on the stability of the proteins, we have performed extensive molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. We have also identified three previously reported pathogenic variants (c.1076T>C; p.Met359Thr), (c.1133C>T; p.Thr378Met) and (c.594_595insC; Gly201Argfs*39) in EDA in family D (four patients), E (two patients) and F (one patient), correspondingly. Presently, our data explain the genetic cause of 18 syndromic and non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients in six autosomal recessive and X-linked pedigrees (A-F), which expand the mutational spectrum of these unique clinical manifestations.

Project description:BackgroundStudies have shown the strong association between histone modification levels and gene expression levels. The detailed relationships between the two can vary substantially due to differential regulation, and hence a simple regression model may not be adequate. We apply a regression hidden Markov model (regHMM) to further investigate the potential multiple relationships between genes and histone methylation levels in mouse embryonic stem cells.ResultsSeven histone methylation levels are used in the study. Averaged histone modifications over non-overlapping 200 bp windows on the range transcription starting site (TSS) ± 1 Kb are used as predictors, and in total 70 explanatory variables are generated. Based on regHMM results, genes segregated into two groups, referred to as State 1 and State 2, have distinct association strengths. Genes in State 1 are better explained by histone methylation levels with R(2)=.72 while those in State 2 have weaker association strength with R(2)=.38. The regression coefficients in the two states are not very different in magnitude except in the intercept,.25 and 1.15 for State 1 and State 2, respectively. We found specific GO categories that may be attributed to the different relationships. The GO categories more frequently observed in State 2 match those of housekeeping genes, such as cytoplasm, nucleus, and protein binding. In addition, the housekeeping gene expression levels are significantly less explained by histone methylation in mouse embryonic stem cells, which is consistent with the constitutive expression patterns that would be expected.ConclusionGene expression levels are not universally affected by histone methylation levels, and the relationships between the two differ by the gene functions. The expression levels of the genes that perform the most common housekeeping genes' GO categories are less strongly associated with histone methylation levels. We suspect that additional biological factors may also be strongly associated with the gene expression levels in State 2. We discover that the effect of the presence of CpG island in TSS ± 1 Kb is larger in State 2.

Dataset Information

Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning.

Publications

Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets