Dataset Information

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development.

ABSTRACT: It has been previously reported that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a therapeutic bile acid, reduced risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in men but not women. Interactions between the gut microbiome and fecal bile acid composition as a factor in colorectal cancer neoplasia have been postulated but evidence is limited to small cohorts and animal studies. Using banked stool samples collected as part of a phase III randomized clinical trial of UDCA for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps, we compared change in the microbiome composition after a 3-year intervention in a subset of participants randomized to oral UDCA at 8-10 mg/kg of body weight per day (n = 198) or placebo (n = 203). Study participants randomized to UDCA experienced compositional changes in their microbiome that were statistically more similar to other individuals in the UDCA arm than to those in the placebo arm. This reflected a UDCA-associated shift in microbial community composition (P < 0.001), independent of sex, with no evidence of a UDCA effect on microbial richness (P > 0.05). These UDCA-associated shifts in microbial community distance metrics from baseline to end-of-study were not associated with risk of any or advanced adenoma (all P > 0.05) in men or women. Separate analyses of microbial networks revealed an overrepresentation of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in the post-UDCA arm and an inverse relationship between F prausnitzii and Ruminococcus gnavus. In men who received UDCA, the overrepresentation of F prausnitzii and underrepresentation of R gnavus were more prominent in those with no adenoma recurrence at follow-up compared to men with recurrence. This relationship was not observed in women. Daily UDCA use modestly influences the relative abundance of microbial species in stool and affects the microbial network composition with suggestive evidence for sex-specific effects of UDCA on stool microbial community composition as a modifier of colorectal adenoma risk.

SUBMITTER: Pearson T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6382922 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development.

Pearson Talima T Caporaso J Gregory JG Yellowhair Monica M Bokulich Nicholas A NA Padi Megha M Roe Denise J DJ Wertheim Betsy C BC Linhart Mark M Martinez Jessica A JA Bilagody Cherae C Hornstra Heidie H Alberts David S DS Lance Peter P Thompson Patricia A PA

Cancer medicine 20190116 2

It has been previously reported that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a therapeutic bile acid, reduced risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in men but not women. Interactions between the gut microbiome and fecal bile acid composition as a factor in colorectal cancer neoplasia have been postulated but evidence is limited to small cohorts and animal studies. Using banked stool samples collected as part of a phase III randomized clinical trial of UDCA for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps ...[more]

PMID: 30652422

Similar Datasets

Project description:The occurrence and development of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma (AA) are closely related to the gut microbiome, and AA has a high cancerization progression rate to CRC. Current studies have revealed that bacteriological analysis cannot identify CRC from AA. The objective was to explore microbial targets that could identify CRC and AA from a microecological perspective and to figure out the best way to identify CRC based on fecal microbes. The metagenomic sequencing data were used to describe the gut microbiome profile and analyze the differences between microbial abundance and microbial single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) characteristics in AA and CRC patients. It was found that there were no significant differences in the diversity between the two groups. The abundance of bacteria (e.g., Firmicutes, Clostridia, and Blautia), fungi (Hypocreales), archaea (Methanosarcina, Methanoculleus, and Methanolacinia), and viruses (Alphacoronavirus, Sinsheimervirus, and Gammaretrovirus) differed between AA and CRC patients. Multiple machine-learning algorithms were used to establish prediction models, aiming to identify CRC and AA. The accuracy of the random forest (RF) model based on the gut microbiome was 86.54%. Nevertheless, the accuracy of SNP was 92.31% in identifying CRC from AA. In conclusion, using microbial SNP was the best method to identify CRC, it was superior to using the gut microbiome, and it could provide new targets for CRC screening. IMPORTANCE There are differences in characteristic microorganisms between AA and CRC. However, current studies have indicated that bacteriological analysis cannot identify CC from AA, and thus, we wondered if there were some other targets that could be used to identify CRC from AA in the gut microbiome. The differences of SNPs in the gut microbiota of intraindividuals were significantly smaller than those of interindividuals. In addition, compared with intestinal microbes, SNP was less affected by time with certain stability. It was discovered that microbial SNP was better than the gut microbiome for identifying CRC from AA. Therefore, screening characteristic microbial SNP could provide a new research direction for identifying CRC from AA.

Dataset Information

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development.

Publications

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets