Dataset Information

Does device matter for inhaled therapies in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparative trial of two devices.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

COPD patients have challenges for effective use of inhalers due to advanced age, fixed airflow obstruction and comorbid medical conditions. Published clinical trials investigate drug efficacy but rarely consider the inhaler device. This trial investigates device efficacy, comparing clinical outcomes for the same medication via two different devices. Our intention was to communicate the results and to critically appraise the study protocol to inform planning of future device comparison research. Subjects with spirometry confirming at least moderate COPD were randomly assigned to inhaler sequence; starting with Accuhaler or metered dose inhaler and spacer (MDI/s). After baseline testing, subjects were assigned to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate (SFC) 500/50 mcg twice daily via the first device for 6 weeks' duration, then changed to the alternate device for the following 6 weeks. Subjects were reassessed in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQL), exercise endurance and lung function after each exposure period.

Results

The recruitment target was not achieved due to unanticipated developments within the pharmaceutical industry, potentially compromising the study's power. Study outcomes did not differ significantly according to the allocated inhaler device even after adjusting for baseline lung function or inhaler technique. Recommendations for future device comparison protocols are offered. Trial registration Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Current Controlled Trials ACTRN12618000075280, date of registration: 18.01.2018. Retrospectively registered.

SUBMITTER: Mannan H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6383223 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does device matter for inhaled therapies in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparative trial of two devices.

Mannan Haider H Foo Soo Wei SW Cochrane Belinda B

BMC research notes 20190220 1

<h4>Objective</h4>COPD patients have challenges for effective use of inhalers due to advanced age, fixed airflow obstruction and comorbid medical conditions. Published clinical trials investigate drug efficacy but rarely consider the inhaler device. This trial investigates device efficacy, comparing clinical outcomes for the same medication via two different devices. Our intention was to communicate the results and to critically appraise the study protocol to inform planning of future device com ...[more]

PMID: 30786914

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is classified as group 3 pulmonary hypertension. Inhaled treprostinil, a prostaglandin I2 analogue also known as prostacyclin, has recently been approved as a first drug for patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to ILD. However, due to a lack of evidence, no therapies are currently approved for those with COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension. Thus, this systematic review aims to summarise the current evidence to assess the impact of inhaled prostaglandin I2 analogue use on the pulmonary hemodynamics, exercise function, lung function, and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to COPD.MethodsWe systematically searched the electronic databases of Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane from inception to 1 February 2023. Studies of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension who received inhaled drugs targeting the prostacyclin pathway were included in the systematic review. Case reports, systematic reviews, conference abstracts with no full text, non-full-text articles, non-English manuscripts and book chapters were excluded from this systematic review. A risk-of-bias assessment was carried out for the studies included in this review, using two different Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.ResultsA total of four studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. The results of one prospective clinical trial showed an improvement in the pulmonary hemodynamics (e.g., cardiac index, cardiac output and mean pulmonary artery pressure) in response to inhaled prostacyclin use in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to COPD. However, the severity of dyspnoea, lung function, exercise capacity and gas exchange were not affected when inhaled prostacyclin was used for patients with COPD-related pulmonary hypertension.ConclusionThis systematic review demonstrated that although inhaled prostacyclin does not seem to improve COPD-related outcomes (e.g., lung function and exercise capacity), short-term use of inhaled prostacyclin has the potential to reduce mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance without impairing ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.Systematic review registrationCRD42022372803, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=372803.

Project description:BackgroundCough is a common symptom in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients with cough may exhibit various clinical characteristics and experience varying outcomes based on inhaled therapies they receive.ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics and outcomes of various inhaled therapies in COPD patients with frequent cough.MethodsThis was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Of these patients, the median cough score in COPD assessment test (CAT) was two. Patients were classified into frequent cough group if they scored two or over in the first item of CAT and infrequent cough group otherwise. Patients with frequent cough were then divided into long-acting antimuscarinic (LAMA), long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA)/LAMA, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA groups. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) (CAT scores decreased ≥2 from baseline) and the improvement of cough (cough score decreased ≥1 from baseline) were collected in the six-month follow-up. Frequent exacerbations (experiencing at least two exacerbations) were collected in the one-year follow-up.ResultsOf 906 patients, 581 (64.1%) patients reported frequent cough at the initial visit. Frequent cough was associated with the current smokers and CAT scores (p < 0.05). The MCID showed no significant difference between frequent cough and infrequent cough groups in the follow-up. More patients with frequent cough experienced future frequent exacerbations compared to those with infrequent cough. After receiving inhaled therapies, 62% of patients with frequent cough got the cough improved. More patients with frequent cough treated with LABA/LAMA or ICS/LABA/LAMA attained MCID and fewer experienced exacerbations than those treated with LAMA or ICS/LABA (p < 0.05). The change in cough score showed no difference among various inhaled therapies in patients with frequent cough.ConclusionCOPD patients with frequent cough were related to current smokers and higher CAT scores. These patients had a higher incidence of frequent exacerbations than those with infrequent cough. Patients with frequent cough who were treated with LABA/LAMA or ICS/LABA/LAMA were more likely to attain MCID and at a lower risk of exacerbation than those treated with LAMA or ICS/LABA.

Project description:RationaleDespite awareness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment recommendations, uptake is poor. The Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) spans 2010-2016, providing an opportunity to assess integration of 2011 Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) treatment strategies over time in a large observational cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate how COPD treatment aligns with 2011 GOLD strategies and determine factors associated with failure to align with recommendations.MethodsInformation on inhaled medication use collected via questionnaire annually for 4 years was compiled into therapeutic classes (long-acting antimuscarinic agent, long-acting β-agonist, inhaled corticosteroids [ICS], and combinations thereof). Medications were not modified by SPIROMICS investigators. 2011 GOLD COPD categories A, B, C, and D were assigned. Alignment of inhaler regimen with first-/second-line GOLD recommendations was determined, stratifying into recommendation aligned or nonaligned. Recommendation-nonaligned participants were further stratified into overuse and underuse categories.ResultsOf 1,721 participants with COPD, at baseline, 52% of regimens aligned with GOLD recommendations. Among participants with nonaligned regimens, 46% reported underuse, predominately owing to lack of long-acting inhalers in GOLD category D. Of the 54% reporting overuse, 95% were treated with nonindicated ICS-containing regimens. Among 431 participants with 4 years of follow-up data, recommendation alignment did not change over time. When we compared 2011 and 2017 recommendations, we found that 47% did not align with either set of recommendations, whereas 35% were in alignment with both recommendations.ConclusionsAmong SPIROMICS participants with COPD, nearly 50% reported inhaler regimens that did not align with GOLD recommendations. Nonalignment was driven largely by overuse of ICS regimens in milder disease and lack of long-acting inhalers in severe disease.

Dataset Information

Does device matter for inhaled therapies in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparative trial of two devices.

Objective

Results

Publications

Does device matter for inhaled therapies in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparative trial of two devices.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets