Dataset Information

Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients and its association with outcomes.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:When used in appropriately selected heart failure (HF) patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and hospitalization. It is not understood whether CRT implantation during hospitalization for HF is associated with similar benefits. HYPOTHESIS:Timing of CRT implantation relative to hospitalization for HF is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS:This analysis included patients eligible for CRT and discharged alive between January 2005 and December 2012 from 388 hospitals in Get With The Guidelines-HF. Participants were linked with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data to evaluate outcomes of all-cause mortality and HF re-hospitalization based on CRT status (present on admission, placed during hospitalization, and prescribed at discharge; reference = no CRT). RESULTS:Of 15 619 CRT-eligible HF patients, 2408 (15%) had CRT on admission, 1269 (8%) underwent CRT implantation during hospitalization and 643 (4%) had CRT prescribed at discharge. Compared with patients without CRT, mortality was lower in those who received CRT implantation during HF hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; P < 0.0001) and those prescribed CRT at discharge (adjusted HR 0.78; P = 0.048). A reduction in HF re-hospitalization was observed in patients with CRT implanted during hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.64; P < 0.0001), but not in those who were prescribed CRT at discharge (adjusted HR 1.02; P = 0.77). CONCLUSION:CRT implantation during HF hospitalization was associated with lower rates of mortality and HF re-hospitalization. These data suggest that a CRT utilization strategy that does not delay implantation to the post-discharge period may be appropriate. Randomized data are needed to definitively identify optimal timing of CRT implantation.

SUBMITTER: Goldstein SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6386168 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients and its association with outcomes.

Goldstein Sarah A SA Mentz Robert J RJ Hellkamp Anne S AS Randolph Tiffany C TC Fonarow Gregg C GC Hernandez Adrian A Yancy Clyde W CW Al-Khatib Sana M SM

Clinical cardiology 20181226 2

<h4>Background</h4>When used in appropriately selected heart failure (HF) patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and hospitalization. It is not understood whether CRT implantation during hospitalization for HF is associated with similar benefits.<h4>Hypothesis</h4>Timing of CRT implantation relative to hospitalization for HF is associated with clinical outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>This analysis included patients eligible for CRT and discharged alive between January 2005 ...[more]

PMID: 30548280

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThe optimum timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation is unknown. We explored long-term outcomes after CRT in relation to the time interval from a first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) to device implantation.Methods and resultsA database covering the population of England (56.3 million in 2019) was used to quantify clinical outcomes after CRT implantation in relation to first HFHs. From 2010 to 2019, 64 968 patients [age: 71.4 ± 11.7 years; 48 606 (74.8%) male] underwent CRT implantation, 57% in the absence of a previous HFH, 12.9% during the first HFH, and 30.1% after ≥1 HFH. Over 4.54 (2.80-6.71) years [median (interquartile range); 272 989 person-years], the time in years from the first HFH to CRT implantation was associated with a higher risk of total mortality [hazard ratio (HR); 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] (1.15; 95% CI 1.14-1.16, HFH (HR: 1.26; 95% CI 1.24-1.28), and the combined endpoint of total mortality or HFH (HR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.27-1.20) than CRT in patients with no previous HFHs, after co-variate adjustment. Total mortality (HR: 1.67), HFH (HR: 2.63), and total mortality or HFH (HR: 1.92) (all P < 0.001) were highest in patients undergoing CRT ≥2 years after the first HFH.ConclusionIn this study of a healthcare system covering an entire nation, delays from a first HFH to CRT implantation were associated with progressively worse long-term clinical outcomes. The best clinical outcomes were observed in patients with no previous HFH and in those undergoing CRT implantation during the first HFH.Condensed abstractThe optimum timing of CRT implantation is unknown. In this study of 64 968 consecutive patients, delays from a first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) to CRT implantation were associated with progressively worse long-term clinical outcomes. Each year from a first HFH to CRT implantation was associated with a 21% higher risk of total mortality and a 34% higher risk of HFH. The best outcomes after CRT were observed in patients with no previous HFHs and in those undergoing implantation during their first HFH.

Project description:Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves quality of life (QOL) in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction. Clinicians may have difficulty choosing between CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P) or a defibrillator (CRT-D) for older patients. CRT-P devices are smaller, have more battery longevity, are less prone to erosions or recalls, and do not deliver shocks. These factors may impact patients' QOL, but data on such comparisons are lacking. Objectives: We examined the impact of CRT-P versus CRT-D on the QOL of older (≥75 years) HF patients who qualified for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Settings/Subjects/Measurements: We enrolled 101 CRT recipients and assessed QOL at baseline and at six-month post-implant using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Minnesota living with heart failure (MLHF) questionnaires. Results: The average age of enrolled patients was 81 years, 27% were women, and 40 received a CRT-P device. After adjusting for baseline QOL score, age, sex, HF functional class, and the occurrence of adverse events, we found no significant differences in QOL outcomes between CRT-P and CRT-D recipients based on either the subscales or the composite scores for the SF-36 or MLHF questionnaires at six-months post-implantation. Conclusions: Older CRT-P and CRT-D recipients report comparable QOL scores six months after device implantation. Larger cohort studies with longer follow-up are needed to accurately assess potential QOL differences between CRT-D and CRT-P recipients to guide clinical decision making and ensure the right balance of risk versus benefit in these patients. Appropriate goals-of-care discussions are the corner stone of clinical decision making regarding defibrillator therapy. As such, even as the data stand at present, there is a need for more deliberate referral of older patients with HF to Palliative Care Specialists, or to Cardiologists trained in Palliative Care Medicine. clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03031847.

Dataset Information

Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients and its association with outcomes.

Publications

Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients and its association with outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets