Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) develop multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (PNENs). Size at diagnosis and growth during follow-up are crucial parameters. According to the WHO 2017, grading is another important parameter. The impact of grading compared to size (WHO 2000) on the clinical course needs to be evaluated.Methods
Sixty PNENs of six patients with MEN-1 were retrospectively evaluated.Results
Fifty-one tumors with a diameter of ConclusionsTumor size of ?20?mm seems to correlate with more aggressive MEN-1 related pancreatic disease, regardless of individual proliferation. Tumors ?20?mm and tumors graded as G2 should be treated surgically regardless of their size.
SUBMITTER: Selberherr A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6387504 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Selberherr Andreas A Koperek Oskar O Riss Philipp P Scheuba Christian C Niederle Martin B MB Kaderli Reto R Perren Aurel A Niederle Bruno B
Orphanet journal of rare diseases 20190222 1
<h4>Background</h4>Patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) develop multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (PNENs). Size at diagnosis and growth during follow-up are crucial parameters. According to the WHO 2017, grading is another important parameter. The impact of grading compared to size (WHO 2000) on the clinical course needs to be evaluated.<h4>Methods</h4>Sixty PNENs of six patients with MEN-1 were retrospectively evaluated.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-one tumors with a di ...[more]