Dataset Information

Tocilizumab Effectiveness After Switching from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Route in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: The RoSwitch Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The main objective of this work was to assess the maintenance of effectiveness of subcutaneous tocilizumab 6 months after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting. Secondary objectives aimed to describe the characteristics of patients and disease, the effectiveness at 12 months after switching, the therapeutic maintenance, and to search for predictive factors of switching.

Methods

We analyzed all the RA patients of the shared medical file "RIC Nord de France", treated with tocilizumab, switching or not from intravenous to subcutaneous tocilizumab, between April 2015 and January 2016. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients remaining in their DAS28-ESR category remission/low disease activity (LDA) or moving to an inferior DAS28-ESR category at 6 months. Since RoSwitch was an observational study, without randomization, a propensity score was built in a sensitivity analysis to balance on RA and patients' characteristics at inclusion between switching and no-switching groups.

Results

An improvement of initial DAS28-ESR category or maintenance in DAS28-ESR remission/LDA at 6 months was shown in 203 of the 285 patients with an evaluation for the primary criterion (71.2%, 95% CI [65.6-76.4%]) without differences between groups (73.3%, 95% CI [63.0-82.1%] vs. 70.3%, 95% CI [63.3-76.6%]). The RoSwitch study showed the maintenance of effectiveness at 6 and 12 months. Similar therapeutic maintenance rates were observed for switch and no-switch patients. No clinical factor was associated with the switch in patients in remission/LDA at inclusion.

Conclusions

The RoSwitch study showed the maintenance of effectiveness at 6 months in RA patients switching from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab.

Funding

Roche SAS and Chugai Pharma France.

SUBMITTER: Darloy J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6393270 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is based on the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Tocilizumab can be used as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs for the treatment of moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous forms of the drug are available, but the SC form is more widely used.ObjectiveTo understand the real-world dose modification patterns of SC tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the United States.MethodsData were obtained from the Truven (now IBM) MarketScan and Optum Clinformatics databases. Patients were included if they had ≥1 pharmacy claims for SC tocilizumab and met other inclusion criteria. The mean, standard deviation, and median values were reported for the continuous variables, and frequency was reported for the categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze the time to first dose modification. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of the likelihood of dose modification.ResultsThe study included 1266 patients in the Truven database and 512 patients in the Optum database who had commercial or Medicare Advantage or supplemental insurance. Of the patients who started treatment with biweekly SC tocilizumab (48% each in the Truven and Optum databases), 37% in Truven and 40% in Optum had dose escalation to a weekly dose. Of those who started weekly SC tocilizumab (43% in the Truven and 49% in the Optum databases), 3% (Truven) and 4% (Optum) had dose reduction. The remaining patients started alternative SC tocilizumab doses. Overall, 60% and 68% of patients in the Truven and Optum cohorts, respectively, initiated or escalated to the higher weekly dose of tocilizumab; the mean time to dose escalation was 126 days and 112 days, respectively. In the Truven cohort, corticosteroid use, age, and anemia were the main predictors for dose escalation. In the Optum cohort, female patients had increased odds of dose escalation compared with male patients.ConclusionThe dosing trends observed in this study show that physicians have taken advantage of the option to increase SC tocilizumab dosing, but only a few providers chose to reduce the dose. This trend in dose modification may increase the costs related to SC tocilizumab therapy.

Project description:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune condition which affects approximately 1% of the adult population worldwide and is characterized by joint inflammation, with extra-articular features being common. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is one of the chief pro-inflammatory cytokines found in the joints and sera of patients with RA. Increased levels of IL-6 correlate with inflammation, disease activity, and radiological damage. RA treatment should focus on minimizing the signs and symptoms of disease (pain, stiffness, and swelling of the joints) and on preventing or minimizing joint damage to preserve functionality and quality of life. The benefits of early, intensive intervention are now acknowledged, with all patients with newly diagnosed, active RA being started on methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy or combination therapy. Lack of efficacy, intolerance, and/or toxicity can lead to discontinuation of this drug, and there is a need for exploring further treatment options. In the UK, patients with persistently high disease activity who have failed at least two conventional disease-modifying agents (DMARDs) including MTX may qualify for biologic therapy. Numerous trials have shown intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ), a biologic drug targeting and inhibiting IL-6, to be effective for controlling inflammation in RA, with an acceptable safety profile. Its superiority in monotherapy when compared with other biologic agents makes it the drug of choice for patients who are intolerant or have contraindications to traditional DMARDs. However, one of the drawbacks of IV TCZ is the requirement for monthly infusions, which is inherently inconvenient for the patient and associated with increased cost. Subcutaneous (SC) TCZ has now been approved following two clinical trials which showed similar efficacy and safety compared to IV TCZ, and better efficacy compared to placebo (SUMMACTA and BREVACTA trials, respectively). Respiratory infections are the most common side effects in patients receiving SC TCZ. Advantages of SC formulations include convenience and reduced cost compared with IV therapies. Overall, patients tend to have a preference for SC over IV administration of medications. Close monitoring of patients should be undertaken in all cases, paying particular attention to the full blood count, liver enzymes, and cholesterol levels.