Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Performance of biological mesh materials in abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.


ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Abdominal wall hernias are a common source of morbidity and mortality. The use of biological mesh has become an important adjunct in successful abdominal wall reconstruction. There are a variety of biological mesh products available; however, there is limited evidence supporting the use of one type over another. This study aims to compare the performance (eg, the rate of hernia recurrence) of either a crosslinked biological mesh product or a non-crosslinked product in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:This is a single-centre, dual arm randomised controlled trial. Patients requiring abdominal wall reconstruction will be assessed for eligibility. Eligible patients will then undergo an informed consent process following by randomisation to either (1) crosslinked porcine dermis mesh (Permacol); or (2) non-crosslinked porcine dermis mesh (Strattice). These groups will be compared for the rate of hernia recurrence at 1 and 2 years as well as the rate of postoperative complications (eg, surgical site infections). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:This study has been approved by the institution's research ethics board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov. All eligible participants will provide informed consent prior to randomization. The results of this study may help guide the choice of biologic mesh for this population. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals as well as national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02703662.

SUBMITTER: Carver DA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6398697 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Performance of biological mesh materials in abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Carver David A DA   Kirkpatrick Andrew W AW   Eberle Tammy L TL   Ball Chad G CG  

BMJ open 20190215 2


<h4>Introduction</h4>Abdominal wall hernias are a common source of morbidity and mortality. The use of biological mesh has become an important adjunct in successful abdominal wall reconstruction. There are a variety of biological mesh products available; however, there is limited evidence supporting the use of one type over another. This study aims to compare the performance (eg, the rate of hernia recurrence) of either a crosslinked biological mesh product or a non-crosslinked product in patien  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7272387 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7042221 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5025615 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7960495 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4035433 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11346840 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6915967 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7016509 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3193311 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8647887 | biostudies-literature