Dataset Information

The post hoc analysis comparing the severity grades of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis scored between the central and local assessors in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of rebamipide for head and neck cancer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:In the treatment of head and neck cancer, severity of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis has been recognized as one of the key factors affecting the outcomes of the anticancer therapies. Therefore, the development of treatments mitigating oral mucositis would be of clinical significance, although the adequate assessment procedure for efficacy evaluation remains to be established. We conducted this post hoc study to assess the effect of objective evaluation of the severity grade on the outcomes of the clinical trial. METHODS:In the original trial with rebamipide liquids (0, 2, and 4%) for chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis, the investigators in local sites and independent central review separately determined the severity grades in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 3.0 based on the Assessment Sheet scored by the investigators. The discordance in severity grades between the investigators and central review was analyzed on cross table. RESULTS:The analysis revealed the discordance rate over the trial was 34%. While the incidences of severe oral mucositis in the placebo, rebamipide 2%, and 4% groups evaluated by the central review were 39%, 29%, and 25%, respectively, the respective values in the investigator's evaluation were 32%, 39%, and 44%. CONCLUSION:In the clinical trial for the treatment of oral mucositis, it was strongly suggested that objective evaluation with a consistent scale would be required.

SUBMITTER: Ueno T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6399175 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The post hoc analysis comparing the severity grades of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis scored between the central and local assessors in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of rebamipide for head and neck cancer.

Ueno Takao T Zenda Sadamoto S Konishi Tetsuhito T Yurikusa Takashi T Shibasaki Yoshiyuki Y Nagamoto Hisashi H Fujii Masato M

International journal of clinical oncology 20181113 3

<h4>Background</h4>In the treatment of head and neck cancer, severity of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis has been recognized as one of the key factors affecting the outcomes of the anticancer therapies. Therefore, the development of treatments mitigating oral mucositis would be of clinical significance, although the adequate assessment procedure for efficacy evaluation remains to be established. We conducted this post hoc study to assess the effect of objective evaluation of the severit ...[more]

PMID: 30426268

Similar Datasets

Project description:Recent preclinical and phase I studies have reported that rebamipide decreased the severity of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with oral cancer. This placebo-controlled randomized phase II study assessed the clinical benefit of rebamipide in reducing the incidence of severe chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).Patients aged 20-75 years with HNC who were scheduled to receive chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive rebamipide 2% liquid, rebamipide 4% liquid, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ? 3 oral mucositis determined by clinical examination and assessed by central review according to the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 3.0. Secondary endpoints were the time to onset of grade ? 3 oral mucositis and the incidence of functional impairment (grade ? 3) based on the evaluation by the Oral Mucositis Evaluation Committee.From April 2014 to August 2015, 97 patients with HNC were enrolled, of whom 94 received treatment. The incidence of grade ? 3 oral mucositis was 29% and 25% in the rebamipide 2% and 4% groups, respectively, compared with 39% in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who did not develop grade ? 3 oral mucositis by day 50 of treatment was 57.9% in the placebo group, whereas the proportion was 68.0% in the rebamipide 2% group and 71.3% in the rebamipide 4% group. The incidences of adverse events potentially related to the study drug were 16%, 26%, and 13% in the placebo, rebamipide 2%, and rebamipide 4% groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in treatment compliance among the groups.The present phase II study suggests that mouth washing with rebamipide may be effective and safe for patients with HNC receiving chemoradiotherapy, and 4% liquid is the optimal dose of rebamipide.ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02085460 (the date of trial registration: March 11, 2014).

Project description:BackgroundConcurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) has been the standard treatment for organ preservation or locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is an important treatment-limiting toxicity. Benzydamine hydrochloride was recommended to prevent oral mucositis. Povidone-iodine had also been adopted to use as an oral rinse to prevent mucositis.ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy between benzydamine hydrochloride and 0.1% povidone-iodine to prevent RIOM in HNC patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy.MethodsWe conducted a randomized control study in HNC patients receiving CCRT with curative intent. The stratification factors were primary site of disease, treatment modality, chemotherapy regimen, and schedule. The primary outcome was RIOM assessed by Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS). Secondary outcomes included RIOM assessed by NCI-CTCAE, use of analgesic, antibiotics and anti-fungal drugs, hospitalization, and participant satisfaction.ResultsThere were 83 participants recruited for this study with 71 completing the trial. Demographic characteristics were well-balanced between both arms. The univariate regression analysis revealed that povidone-iodine correlated with less RIOM compared to benzydamine hydrochloride (coefficient -2.25, 95% CI -4.37 to -0.012, p-value 0.03). The incidence of grade III-IV CTCAE RIOM during the study period was 51.4% with benzydamine hydrochloride compared to 26.5% with 0.1% povidone iodine (p-value 0.032). The peak incidence of grade III-IV CTCAE RIOM occurred in the 7th week of treatment (40.5% vs. 11.8%, p-value 0.01). This indicated the efficacy of povidone-iodine to prevent severe RIOM which usually most severity in the last week of CCRT treatment. The multivariate analysis revealed that the CCRT setting (definitive vs. adjuvant) and gargling agents (povidone-iodine vs. benzydamine hydrochloride were the factors associated with RIOM.ConclusionThis study demonstrated higher efficacy of 0.1% povidone-iodine gargle than benzydamine hydrochloride in mucositis prevention.

Project description:BackgroundLow-level laser therapy (LLLT) also called Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) could reduce oral mucositis (OM) incidence and severity in head and neck cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy, however randomised data about efficacy and safety are missing with curative dose 4 J/cm2.MethodsThis phase III trial was conducted in patients with oral cavity, or oro/hypopharyngeal cancers (stage III or IV). Patients were treated by lasertherapy on OM lesions grade ≥ 2 (4 J/cm2 or placebo), during chemoradiotherapy and until recovery. Severity of OM (incidence and duration of grades ≥3) was used as primary endpoint and blindly assessed.ResultsAmong 97 randomised patients, 83 patients (85.6%) could be assessed finally (erroneous inclusions, chemoradiotherapy interruptions) and 32 patients had no lasertherapy because of unreachable OM lesions. Randomisation and population characteristics (sex ratio, age, chemoradiotherapy procedures, toxicities incidence) were still comparable between the two LLLT/PBMT groups. An acute OM (grade ≥ 3) was observed in 41 patients (49.4%): 23 patients (54.8%) of the active laser group versus 18 (43.9%) in the control group (modified intend to treat, p = 0.32). Median time before occurrence of OM ≥ grade 3 in half of the patients was 8 weeks in active laser group (vs. 9 weeks in control group). However, 95% of patients exhibited a very good tolerance of LLLT/PBMT.ConclusionsThis study assessed LLLT/PBMT according to the Multinational Association of Supportive care in Cancer recommendations but lacked power. LLLT/PBMT was well tolerated with a good safety profile, which promotes its use in clinical routine for severe OM treatment.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01772706 .TitleLaser Mucite ORL: Effectiveness of Laser Therapy for Mucositis Induced by a Radio-chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (LaserMucite). Study Start Date: October 2008. Primary Completion Date: October 2016. Responsible Party: Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin. Principal Investigator: Eric Jadaud, M.D., Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin.FundingFrench Ministry of Health, French national funding scheme (PHRC 2008).

Dataset Information

The post hoc analysis comparing the severity grades of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis scored between the central and local assessors in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of rebamipide for head and neck cancer.

Publications

The post hoc analysis comparing the severity grades of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis scored between the central and local assessors in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of rebamipide for head and neck cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets