Dataset Information

Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Pelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. STUDY DESIGN:A screening examination was developed by Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery subspecialists and women's health physical therapists at our institution and tested in a simulated patient. We recruited 35 new patients who underwent examinations by blinded, paired, independent examiners. Agreement was calculated with the use of percent agreement and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS:The final examination protocol begins with examination of the following external sites: bilateral sacroiliac joints, medial edge of the anterior superior iliac spine, and cephalad edge of the pubic symphysis (self-reported pain: yes/no). The internal examination follows with palpation of each muscle group in the center of the muscle belly, then along the length of the muscle proceeding counter-clockwise: right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus (pain on a scale of 0-10). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Correlation was high at each external (0.80-0.89) and internal point (0.63-0.87; P<.0001). CONCLUSION:Our newly developed, standardized, reproducible examination incorporates assessment of internal and external points to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. The examination is straightforward and reproducible and allows for easy use in clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Meister MR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6401230 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

Meister Melanie R MR Sutcliffe Siobhan S Ghetti Chiara C Chu Christine M CM Spitznagle Theresa T Warren David K DK Lowder Jerry L JL

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 20181207 3

<h4>Background</h4>Pelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain.<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofasci ...[more]

PMID: 30527941

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Pelvic floor myofascial pain, which is predominantly identified in the muscles of the levator ani and obturator internus, has been observed in women with chronic pelvic pain and other pelvic floor disorder symptoms, and is hypothesized to contribute to their symptoms. OBJECTIVES:To describe the prevalence of pelvic floor myofascial pain in patients presenting with pelvic floor disorder symptoms and to investigate whether severity of pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination correlates with degree of pelvic floor disorder symptom bother. STUDY DESIGN:All new patients seen at 1 tertiary referral center between 2014 and 2016 were included in this retrospectively assembled cross-sectional study. Pelvic floor myofascial pain was determined by transvaginal palpation of the bilateral obturator internus and levator ani muscles and scored as a discrete number on an 11-point verbal pain rating scale (range, 0-10) at each site. Scores were categorized as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) for each site. Pelvic floor disorder symptom bother was assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form scores. The correlation between these 2 measures was calculated using Spearman rank and partial rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS:A total of 912 new patients were evaluated. After exclusion of 79 with an acute urinary tract infection, 833 patients were included in the final analysis. Pelvic floor myofascial pain (pain rated >0 in any muscle group) was identified in 85.0% of patients: 50.4% rated as severe, 25.0% moderate, and 9.6% mild. In unadjusted analyses and those adjusted for postmenopausal status, severity of pelvic floor myofascial pain was significantly correlated with subjective prolapse symptoms such as pelvic pressure and heaviness but not with objective prolapse symptoms (seeing or feeling a vaginal bulge or having to push up on a bulge to start or complete urination) or leading edge. Severity of myofascial pain at several individual pelvic floor sites was also independently correlated with lower urinary tract symptoms, including pain in the lower abdomen (myofascial pain at all sites) and difficulty emptying the bladder (right obturator internus and left levator ani); and with defecatory dysfunction, including sensation of incomplete rectal emptying (pain at all sites combined and the right obturator internus), anal incontinence to flatus (pain at all sites combined), and pain with defecation (pain at all sites combined, and the right obturator internus and left levator ani). CONCLUSION:Pelvic floor myofascial pain was common in patients seeking evaluation for pelvic floor disorder symptoms. Location and severity of pelvic floor myofascial pain was significantly correlated with degree of symptom bother, even after controlling for postmenopausal status. Given the high prevalence of pelvic floor myofascial pain in these patients and correlation between pain severity and degree of symptom bother, a routine assessment for pelvic floor myofascial pain should be considered for all patients presenting for evaluation of pelvic floor symptoms.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate sensitization, myofascial trigger points, and quality of life in women with chronic pelvic pain with and without endometriosis. METHODS:A cross-sectional prospective study of women aged 18-50 years with pain suggestive of endometriosis and healthy, pain-free volunteers without a history of endometriosis. Patients underwent a physiatric neuromusculoskeletal assessment of clinical signs of sensitization and myofascial trigger points in the abdominopelvic region. Pain symptoms, psychosocial, and quality-of-life measures were also assessed. All participants with pain underwent laparoscopic excision of suspicious lesions to confirm endometriosis diagnosis by histologic evaluation. RESULTS:Patients included 18 with current, biopsy-proven endometriosis, 11 with pain only, and 20 healthy volunteers. The prevalence of sensitization as measured by regional allodynia and hyperalgesia was similar in both pain groups (83 and 82%) but much lower among healthy volunteers (15%, P<.001). Nearly all women with pain had myofascial trigger points (94 and 91%). Adjusting for study group, those with high anxiety (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.099, P=.031) and depression (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.005-1.113, P=.032) scores were more likely to have sensitization. Pain patients with any history of endometriosis had the highest proportion of sensitization compared with the others (87% compared with 67% compared with 15%; P<.001). Adjusting for any history of endometriosis, those with myofascial trigger points were most likely sensitized (OR 9.41, 95% CI 1.77-50.08, P=.009). CONCLUSION:Sensitization and myofascial trigger points were common in women with pain regardless of whether they had endometriosis at surgery. Those with any history of endometriosis were most likely to have sensitization. Traditional methods of classifying endometriosis-associated pain based on disease, duration, and anatomy are inadequate and should be replaced by a mechanism-based evaluation, as our study illustrates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00073801. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:II.

Project description:ObjectivePelvic floor pain, abdominal wall pain, and central nervous system pain amplification can be contributing factors in chronic pelvic pain (CPP), however; limited research has investigated the association of pelvic floor, abdominal, and uterine tenderness with central nervous system pain amplification. We assessed whether pressure pain thresholds on the non-dominant thumbnail, a marker of central nervous system pain amplification, were associated with pelvic floor, abdominal, and uterine tenderness among women with endometriosis or CPP.Study designWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 88 females with endometriosis and/or CPP. Abdominal (6 locations), pelvic floor (6 locations) and uterine (1 location) tenderness were assessed via a standardized physical exam. Participants reported their pain levels (0-10 scale) with application of 2 kg of pressure at each area, with a pain rating of ≥4 on the 0-10 scale considered moderate to severe pain. Pain sensitivity was measured on the non-dominant thumbnail by applying discrete pressure stimuli using a previously validated protocol.ResultsOverall, 50% (44/88), 42% (37/88), and 58% (51/88) of participants reported high pelvic floor, abdominal, and uterine tenderness, respectively. Pressure intensities needed to elicit 'faint' and 'mild' pain were lower for participants with high vs. low pelvic floor tenderness (median intensity for 'faint' pain = 0.50 kgf/cm2(min-max:0.25-3.25) vs. 1.06(0.25-3.00), p-value = 0.006; median intensity for 'mild' pain = 2.00(0.63-4.88) vs. 2.63(0.75-6.00), p-value = 0.03). No association was observed between pressure pain sensitivity and abdominal or uterine tenderness (p > 0.11). Participants with endometriosis without pain were less likely to have high pelvic floor (22.2%), abdominal (11.1%), and uterine (25.9%) tenderness compared to participants with endometriosis with pain (63.0%, 50%, 65.2%, respectively) and participants with chronic pelvic pain (60%, 73.3%, 93.3%, respectively).ConclusionsThese results suggest that high pelvic floor tenderness among women with endometriosis/CPP may be a marker of heightened pain sensitivity suggestive of central nervous system pain amplification and may impact treatment response. Future research should examine whether this clinical phenotype predicts response to medical and behavioral treatments (e.g, anti-convulsants, behavioral therapy, Physical Therapy).

Dataset Information

Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

Publications

Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets