Dataset Information

Prescription medication use during pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions (2001-2013): A retrospective population-based study in a Canadian population.

ABSTRACT: We aimed to describe medication use in pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions, as well as use after a pregnancy-related visit to characterize the receipt of medication after knowledge of pregnancy. Abortions included both spontaneous and induced abortions. Rates of medication use among women with a pregnancy outcome (2001-2013) were described using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Use was determined as ? 1 prescription filled during pregnancies that resulted in births (livebirth/stillbirth) and abortions. Rates were calculated at any time during pregnancy and after a pregnancy-related visit. Rates were additionally characterized by risk in pregnancy using Briggs classification (2017). Of 174,848 birth pregnancies, overall 64.9% filled ? 1 prescription during pregnancy (a significant increase from 62.3% to 68.8% from 2001-2013, p<0.0001); 55.4% filled ? 1 prescription after a pregnancy-related visit. Of 71,967 abortions, 44.7% filled ? 1 prescription (a significant increase from 42.6% to 46.8% from 2001-2013, p<0.0001). Only 3.7% of birth pregnancies had at least one prescription for a contraindicated medication (according to Briggs classification), whereas 10.8% of abortions filled a prescription for a contraindicated medication. The most common drugs used in pregnancy were amoxicillin, doxylamine, codeine combinations, nitrofurantoin, cephalexin, salbutamol and ranitidine. Fewer women filled prescriptions for undesirable medications according to Briggs classification during pregnancy after a pregnancy-related visit.

SUBMITTER: Leong C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6402756 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prescription medication use during pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions (2001-2013): A retrospective population-based study in a Canadian population.

Leong Christine C Chateau Dan D Dahl Matthew M Falk Jamie J Katz Alan A Bugden Shawn S Raymond Colette C

PloS one 20190306 3

We aimed to describe medication use in pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions, as well as use after a pregnancy-related visit to characterize the receipt of medication after knowledge of pregnancy. Abortions included both spontaneous and induced abortions. Rates of medication use among women with a pregnancy outcome (2001-2013) were described using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Use was determined as ≥ 1 prescription filled d ...[more]

PMID: 30840711

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMedication-wide association studies (MWAS) have been applied to assess the risk of individual prescription use and a wide range of health outcomes, including cancer, acute myocardial infarction, acute liver failure, acute renal failure, and upper gastrointestinal ulcers. Current literature on the use of preconception and periconception medication and its association with the risk of multiple gestation pregnancies (eg, monozygotic and dizygotic) is largely based on assisted reproductive technology (ART) cohorts. However, among non-ART pregnancies, it is unknown whether other medications increase the risk of multifetal pregnancies.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the risk of multiple gestational births (eg, twins and triplets) following preconception and periconception exposure to prescription medications in patients who delivered at Penn Medicine.MethodsWe used electronic health record data between 2010 and 2017 on patients who delivered babies at Penn Medicine, a health care system in the Greater Philadelphia area. We explored 3 logistic regression models: model 1 (no adjustment); model 2 (adjustment for maternal age); and model 3-our final logistic regression model (adjustment for maternal age, ART use, and infertility diagnosis). In all models, multiple births (MBs) were our outcome of interest (binary outcome), and each medication was assessed separately as a binary variable. To assess our MWAS model performance, we defined ART medications as our gold standard, given that these medications are known to increase the risk of MB.ResultsOf the 63,334 distinct deliveries in our cohort, only 1877 pregnancies (2.96%) were prescribed any medication during the preconception and first trimester period. Of the 123 medications prescribed, we found 26 (21.1%) medications associated with MB (using nominal P values) and 10 (8.1%) medications associated with MB (using Bonferroni adjustment) in fully adjusted model 3. We found that our model 3 algorithm had an accuracy of 85% (using nominal P values) and 89% (using Bonferroni-adjusted P values).ConclusionsOur work demonstrates the opportunities in applying the MWAS approach with electronic health record data to explore associations between preconception and periconception medication exposure and the risk of MB while identifying novel candidate medications for further study. Overall, we found 3 novel medications linked with MB that could be explored in further work; this demonstrates the potential of our method to be used for hypothesis generation.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Food insecurity, defined as inadequate access to food owing to financial constraints, has been associated with poor disease management. Because cost-related nonadherence to prescription drugs is a possible explanation for such association, we examined the link between food insecurity and cost-related medication nonadherence in Canada. METHODS:Drawing on data for adult respondents (age ≥ 18 yr) who participated in the Canadian Community Health Survey 2016 Rapid Response module on prescription medication use, we assessed the association between household food insecurity and cost-related nonadherence to prescription drugs in the previous 12 months. We further examined the self-perceived health consequences of cost-related nonadherence among nonadherents. We applied Poisson models with bootstrap weights adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS:Of the 11 172 respondents in our sample, 930 (8.3%) reported cost-related nonadherence. Food insecurity affected 10.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1% to 11.8%) of adherents and 47.9% (95% CI 38.1% to 57.7%) of nonadherents. After adjustment for confounders, moderate and severe food insecurity were associated with 3.83 (95% CI 2.44 to 6.03) and 5.05 (95% CI 3.27 to 7.81) times higher prevalence of cost-related nonadherence, respectively, relative to food security. Despite being associated with lower probability of cost-related nonadherence, having drug insurance did not change the relation between food insecurity and cost-related nonadherence (p > 0.1 for all interactions). Severe food insecurity was correlated with higher prevalence of health deterioration and greater use of health care services as perceived consequences of cost-related nonadherence (p < 0.01 for both). INTERPRETATION:Food-insecure adults in Canada have a higher likelihood of cost-related nonadherence to prescription medications than their food-secure counterparts, which may constitute a burden on their health and lead to greater use of health care services.

Project description:IntroductionAlthough considered an essential service by the WHO, there are indications that access to induced abortion care has been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic.ObjectivesTo investigate if the number of induced abortions and ongoing pregnancies changed during the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in 2020 compared with recent years prior to the pandemic and explore possible reasons for the findings.DesignConvergent parallel mixed-methods design. Collection of quantitative data from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and the Swedish Pregnancy Register, and qualitative data from interviews.Setting and time periodNational data on abortions (January 2018-June 2020) and births (January 2018-March 2021). Interviews performed at the main abortion clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden, in June 2020.ParticipantsAll women aged 15-44 years living in Sweden 2018-2020, approximately 1.9 million. 15 women who sought abortion were interviewed.Primary and secondary outcome measuresNumber of abortions and births/1000 women aged 15-44 years. Themes and subthemes identified from interviews.ResultsThe number of abortions and ongoing pregnancies did not change significantly during the study period compared with before the pandemic started. Interview themes identified were the following: meeting with abortion care during the COVID-19 pandemic (availability, and fear of being infected and infecting others); and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the abortion decision (to catch COVID-19 during pregnancy, feelings of loneliness and isolation, and social aspects).ConclusionsThis study shows that the number of abortions and ongoing pregnancies remained unchanged during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 in Sweden compared with before the start of the pandemic. Abortion-seeking women did not hesitate to proceed with the abortion. The women expressed a number of fears concerning both availability of care and their health, which could have been properly addressed by the authorities.

Dataset Information

Prescription medication use during pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions (2001-2013): A retrospective population-based study in a Canadian population.

Publications

Prescription medication use during pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions (2001-2013): A retrospective population-based study in a Canadian population.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets