Dataset Information

Making Function Part of the Conversation: Clinician Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Although there is increasing interest in using functional status to guide clinical decision making, function is seldom routinely assessed in primary care. We explored clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to routine measurement of older adults' functional status in primary care settings. DESIGN:Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING:Primary care and geriatrics clinics at six Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. PARTICIPANTS:Twenty-four primary care providers, including 17 from primary care clinics and 7 from geriatrics clinics. MEASUREMENTS:We conducted interviews to elicit clinician perspectives about functional status measurement, including barriers and facilitators to routine assessment. We analyzed transcripts iteratively using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic approach. RESULTS:Interviews revealed three distinct aspects to measuring function: screening and assessment, documentation, and use of data to inform care. Barriers and facilitators to screening and assessment included time availability, clinic processes, and degree of interdisciplinary environment. Barriers and facilitators to documentation included the usability and integration of electronic instruments into workflows and the availability of a standardized location to document function in the electronic medical record. Barriers and facilitators to use of data included the availability of a standardized location to retrieve data on function, the availability of appropriate referrals and services, and provider knowledge of available resources to address functional impairments. To address these barriers, providers emphasized the critical importance of connecting measurement of function directly to improved patient care. CONCLUSION:Although clinicians emphasized the importance of measuring function, they also cautioned against additional workload burdens, cumbersome electronic documentation, and measurement of function without ensuring that these data are used to improve care. Approaches to functional status measurement must address these barriers to improve care and outcomes for older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:493-502, 2019.

SUBMITTER: Nicosia FM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6402957 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Making Function Part of the Conversation: Clinician Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Nicosia Francesca M FM Spar Malena J MJ Steinman Michael A MA Lee Sei J SJ Brown Rebecca T RT

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 20181202 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>Although there is increasing interest in using functional status to guide clinical decision making, function is seldom routinely assessed in primary care. We explored clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to routine measurement of older adults' functional status in primary care settings.<h4>Design</h4>Qualitative study using semistructured interviews.<h4>Setting</h4>Primary care and geriatrics clinics at six Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.<h4>Participants</h4>T ...[more]

PMID: 30506667

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsPatient-centered care (PCC) benefits patients, health-care providers, and health-care systems by providing delivery of care that addresses patient values and needs while improving provider experiences, and by decreasing health-care expenditure. To improve PCC, health-care systems need to measure it. Recently, we developed a PCC framework that is evidence based and patient informed. The purpose of this study was to gather the perspective of clinician-scientists and quality improvement experts regarding the PCC domains included in the framework. Their perspectives were used to refine these domains, which ultimately will inform the development of PCC quality indicators.MethodsParticipants were recruited via expert and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinician-scientists and quality improvement experts from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom from October 2017 to January 2018. With the use of an interview guide developed using the PCC framework, interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for a thematic analysis using NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes.ResultsSixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, which included four clinician-scientists and 12 quality improvement experts. Twelve of the participants were from Canada, three from the United Kingdom, and one from the United States. From the thematic analysis, three major themes were identified: (a) measurability of PCC, (b) practical considerations for implementing measurement, and (c) policy and practice implications. Participants discussed barriers and recommendations to improve and increase the clarity of the PCC domains in health system reporting, resulting in several future directions to refine and target specific PCC domains.ConclusionClinician-scientists and quality improvement experts provided key recommendations for the measurement of PCC. The perspectives of key stakeholders in PCC measurement will inform strategies for the implementation and uptake of patient-centered quality indicators in health-care systems. The views of these key experts can lay the foundation for the development of standardized measures of PCC, to ensure monitoring and improvement of PCC.

Project description:BackgroundBirthing individuals experience significant physical and psychosocial transitions during the postpartum period. Despite amplified health needs, many individuals do not successfully transition from obstetric to primary care. Patient navigation provides a patient-centered solution that has been applied to other health care specialties resulting in improved care coordination and patient engagement for populations in greatest need. Our objective was to understand primary care clinician perspectives regarding the role of navigators in improving postpartum care for individuals with low income.MethodsIn this qualitative investigation, we conducted focus groups with primary care clinicians from family and internal medicine specialties. Semistructured interview guides addressed clinician perceptions of navigator roles during the postpartum period and recommendations for navigator training. Focus group discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via a constant comparative method.ResultsTwenty-eight primary care clinicians, including 26 physicians and 2 advanced practice registered nurses, participated in 8 focus groups. Participants reported favorable attitudes toward implementation of a postpartum patient navigation program. Themes regarding useful navigation services included streamlining obstetric to primary care transition, enhancing visit effectiveness, creating personalized postpartum care, and providing patient- and clinician-focused education. Recommendations for navigator training included education on basic medical concerns that are common in the postpartum period, health information privacy and electronic health record use, health care systems, and community resources.Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03922334.ConclusionsPrimary care clinicians were highly receptive to the concept of patient navigation as a process to improve health in the postpartum period through enhanced care coordination and improved patient knowledge, engagement, and self-efficacy.

Project description:BackgroundPeople with prediabetes are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and its complications, such as cardiovascular diseases and premature mortality. Primary prevention and health maintenance are therefore imperative. Evidence has shown that prediabetes can be prevented or delayed with behavioural change, mainly in eating habits and physical activity. Interventions that use a person-centered approach can lead to improvements in self-management, quality of life, and health outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research that engages healthcare professionals and people with prediabetes in constructing and implementing preventive programs. The purpose of this study is to explore and describe how healthcare professionals perceive prediabetes, the current challenges in its detection and treatment, and what is needed to improve quality of care.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted in Region Stockholm. A total of 26 primary health care professionals participated in individual interviews: 15 diabetes nurses and/or district nurses, five general practitioners, five dietitians, and one physiotherapist. Interview transcripts were analyzed with qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis revealed two main themes that emphasize the need to make prediabetes more visible in primary health care. Despite the healthcare professionals' engagement and their motivation to improve prediabetes care, ad hoc practices and the absence of clear screening guidelines and referral pathways made it harder to focus on primary prevention. Supporting professionals in implementing structured care for people with prediabetes might encourage more efficient interprofessional collaboration and contribute to better strategies for promoting behavioural change.ConclusionsEstablishing prediabetes care guidelines, supporting health care professionals´ knowledge and skills in prediabetes care, and implementing interprofessional referral pathways are some steps to enhance prediabetes detection and care precedence in primary health care. These steps could lead to more preventive care and ensure patient safety and health care equity.

Project description:Background: National Consensus Project for quality palliative care guidelines emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive assessment of all care domains, including physical, psychosocial, and spiritual aspects of care, for seriously ill patients. However, less is known about how real-world practice compares with this guideline. Objective: To describe clinicians' assessment practices and factors influencing their approach. Design: This is a two-part web-based survey of palliative care clinicians from five academic groups in the United States. Results: Nineteen out of 25 invited clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) completed the survey. A majority (62%) reported that, although some elements of assessment were mandatory, their usual practice was to tailor the focus of the consultation. Time limitations and workload received the highest mean scores as reasons for tailored assessment (6.1 on a 0-9 importance scale), followed by beliefs that comprehensive assessment is unnecessary (4.8) and absence of the full interdisciplinary team (4.4). All participants cited symptom acuity, and 91% cited reason for consult as factors influencing a tailored approach. Among domains "always" assessed, physical symptoms were reported most commonly (81%) and spiritual and cultural factors least commonly (24% and 19%, respectively). Although a majority of clinicians reported usually tailoring their consultations, mean importance scores for almost all assessment elements were high (range 3.9-8.8, mean 7.1); however, there was some variation based on reason for consult. Spiritual elements received lower importance scores relative to other elements (5.0 vs. 7.4 mean score for all others). Conclusion: Although clinicians placed high importance on most elements included in comprehensive palliative care, in practice they often tailored their consultations, and the perceived relative importance of domains shifted depending upon the type of consultation.

Dataset Information

Making Function Part of the Conversation: Clinician Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Publications

Making Function Part of the Conversation: Clinician Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets