Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.


ABSTRACT: Background:We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). Methods:CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. Results:Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P?=?0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342-0.940); P?=?0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P?=?0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P?=?0.048). Conclusions:Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest.

SUBMITTER: Niu T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6404342 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>.

Niu Tianshui T   Luo Qixia Q   Li Yaqing Y   Zhou Yanzi Y   Yu Wei W   Xiao Yonghong Y  

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control 20190306


<h4>Background</h4>We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI).<h4>Methods</h4>CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/s  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9309244 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7242406 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8152955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6656545 | biostudies-literature
2023-07-01 | GSE218219 | GEO
| S-EPMC5121382 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8300792 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4462660 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4200152 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9226555 | biostudies-literature