Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Imarikiren in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Imarikiren is a novel, potent, and selective direct renin inhibitor that has shown high oral availability during clinical development for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of imarikiren in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:This was a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2, dose-finding trial. A total of 415 patients were randomized to imarikiren 5, 20, 40, or 80 mg; placebo; or candesartan cilexetil 8 mg treatment for 12 weeks. The primary end point was change in log-transformed urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to the end of treatment analyzed using analysis of covariance and a fixed sequence testing procedure. Secondary efficacy end points included urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio at each assessment point and remission and progression rates. Exploratory efficacy end points included eGFR and sitting BP before dosing. RESULTS:Changes in the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to the end of treatment were 16% (placebo), -16% (imarikiren 5 mg), -27% (imarikiren 20 mg), -38% (imarikiren 40 mg), -39% (imarikiren 80 mg), and -31% (candesartan cilexetil 8 mg). Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio reductions from baseline were statistically significant in all imarikiren groups versus placebo (P<0.001 each) as well as for candesartan cilexetil 8 mg versus placebo (P<0.001). Remission rates (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio <30 mg/g creatinine and decreased ?30% from baseline) were higher in all imarikiren groups versus the placebo group. Incidence of adverse events was higher in the imarikiren 80-mg group (52%) versus placebo (42%) and candesartan cilexetil (43%) groups. Incidence of adverse events for the other imarikiren groups ranged from 33% to 42%. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. All imarikiren doses were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:Imarikiren resulted in a dose-dependent improvement in albuminuria compared with placebo, and it was well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

SUBMITTER: Ito S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6419291 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and Safety of Imarikiren in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Ito Sadayoshi S Kagawa Tomoya T Saiki Takuya T Shimizu Kohei K Kuroda Shingo S Sano Yuhei Y Umeda Yuusuke Y

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 20190212 3

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>Imarikiren is a novel, potent, and selective direct renin inhibitor that has shown high oral availability during clinical development for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of imarikiren in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.<h4>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</h4>This was a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2, dose-finding trial. A total of 415 patient ...[more]

PMID: 30755452

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:The progression of kidney disease in some patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may not be adequately suppressed by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Esaxerenone (CS-3150) is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker that has shown kidney protective effects in preclinical studies, and it is a potential add-on therapy to treat diabetic kidney disease. This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 365 hypertensive or normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ?45 to <300 mg/g creatinine) treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor who had eGFR?30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Participants were randomized to receive 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, or 5 mg/d esaxerenone or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to week 12 (with last observation carried forward). RESULTS:Esaxerenone treatment at 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/d significantly reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio by the end of treatment (38%, 50%, and 56%, respectively) compared with placebo (7%; all P<0.001). The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio remission rate (defined as urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio <30 mg/g creatinine at the end of treatment and ?30% decrease from baseline) was 21% in the 2.5- and 5-mg/d groups versus 3% for placebo (both P<0.05). Adverse events occurred slightly more frequently with esaxerenone versus placebo, but the frequencies of drug-related adverse events and discontinuation rates were similar in the placebo and the 0.625-, 1.25-, and 2.5-mg/d groups. Drug-related adverse events and treatment discontinuations were marginally higher in the 5-mg/d group. The most common drug-related adverse event was hyperkalemia, which was dose proportional. CONCLUSIONS:Adding esaxerenone at 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/d for 12 weeks to an ongoing renin-angiotensin system inhibitor significantly reduces urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

Project description:Background and objectivesDiabetic kidney disease is an important complication of type 2 diabetes. In a phase 2b study, adding esaxerenone to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors dose dependently reduced the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. This 52-week phase 3 study further investigated the effects of esaxerenone on the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in this patient group.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, patients with type 2 diabetes and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 45 to <300 mg/g creatinine treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were randomized to esaxerenone or placebo for 52 weeks (n=455). Esaxerenone was initiated at 1.25 mg/d and titrated to 2.5 mg/d on the basis of serum potassium monitoring. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio remission (<30 mg/g creatinine and ≥30% reduction from baseline on two consecutive occasions).ResultsOverall, 49 (22%) and nine (4%) patients in the esaxerenone and placebo groups, respectively, achieved urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio remission (absolute difference 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12% to 25%; P<0.001). The percent change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to end of treatment was significantly higher with esaxerenone versus placebo (-58% versus 8%; geometric least-squares mean ratio to placebo 0.38, 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.44). There was a significant improvement with esaxerenone versus placebo in time to first remission (hazard ratio, 5.13; 95% confidence interval, 3.27 to 8.04) and time to first transition to urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g creatinine (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.48). More patients had a serum potassium level ≥6.0 or ≥5.5 mEq/L on two consecutive measurements in the esaxerenone group (20 [9%]) versus placebo (5 [2%]); these events were asymptomatic and resolved after dosage reduction or treatment discontinuation.ConclusionsAdding esaxerenone to existing renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria increased the likelihood of albuminuria returning to normal levels, and reduced progression of albuminuria to higher levels.

Project description:IntroductionThe efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, was evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on sulfonylurea monotherapy.MethodsThe CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes study that randomized participants to placebo or canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg once daily in addition to routine therapy. Participants in the CANVAS trial are men and women aged ≥30 years with T2DM and a history or high risk of cardiovascular disease, and inadequate glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥7.0% and ≤10.5%) on current antihyperglycemic therapies. The primary objective of this prespecified substudy was to assess change from baseline to 18 weeks in HbA1c among patients on sulfonylurea monotherapy.ResultsOf the 4330 patients enrolled in CANVAS, 127 met the entry criteria for the sulfonylurea monotherapy substudy (placebo, n = 45; canagliflozin 100 mg, n = 42; canagliflozin 300 mg, n = 40). At 18 weeks, placebo-subtracted changes (95% confidence interval) in HbA1c were -0.74% (-1.15, -0.33; P < 0.001) and -0.83% (-1.24, -0.42; P < 0.001) with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg, respectively. Relative to placebo, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg also decreased fasting plasma glucose (FPG; -2.1 mmol/L [-3.0, -1.2] and -2.7 mmol/L [-3.6, -1.7], respectively). Body weight was lower with canagliflozin 300 mg (-1.8% [-3.2, -0.4]; P = 0.014) but unchanged with canagliflozin 100 mg (-0.4% [-1.8, 1.0]; P = 0.557). Canagliflozin 300 mg increased hypoglycemia episodes compared to canagliflozin 100 mg and placebo (15%, 0%, and 4.4%, respectively). Adverse events (AEs) of male and female genital mycotic infections, pollakiuria, and thirst were more common with canagliflozin.ConclusionsCanagliflozin added to ongoing sulfonylurea monotherapy produced improvements in HbA1c, FPG, and body weight, with an increased incidence of AEs consistent with the mechanism of action of SGLT2 inhibition.FundingJanssen Research & Development, LLC.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01032629.

Project description:BackgroundNational guidelines for managing diabetes set standards for care. We sought to determine whether a 1-year intensive multitherapy program resulted in greater goal attainment than usual care among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe identified patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes receiving outpatient care in the community or at our hospital. Patients 30-70 years of age with a hemoglobin A1c concentration of 8% or greater were randomly assigned to receive intensive multitherapy (n = 36) or usual care (n = 36).ResultsThe average hemoglobin A1c concentration at entry was 9.1% (standard deviation [SD] 1%) in the intensive therapy group and 9.3% (SD 1%) in the usual therapy group. By 12 months, a higher proportion of patients in the intensive therapy group than in the control group had achieved Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) goals for hemoglobin A(1c) concentrations (goal < or = 7.0%: 35% v. 8%), diastolic blood pressure (goal < 80 mm Hg: 64% v. 37%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (goal < 2.5 mmol/L: 53% v. 20%) and triglyceride levels (goal < 1.5 mmol/L: 44% v. 14%). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in attaining the targets for fasting plasma glucose levels, systolic blood pressure or total cholesterol:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. None of the patients reached all CDA treatment goals. By 18 months, differences in goal attainment were no longer evident between the 2 groups, except for LDL-C levels. Quality of life, as measured by a specific questionnaire, increased in both groups, with a greater increase in the intensive therapy group (13% [SD 10%] v. 6% [SD 13%], p < 0.003).InterpretationIntensive multitherapy for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes is successful in helping patients meet most of the goals set by a national diabetes association. However, 6 months after intensive therapy stopped and patients returned to usual care, the benefits had vanished.

Project description:BackgroundCanagliflozin is a new SGLT2 inhibitor which has been approved as an adjunct to diet and exercise for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus in more than 30 countries. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with T2D, we carried out a meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials to offer an additional evidence of the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin for evidence-based clinical practice, strictly restricting the treatment durations to 26 weeks (core period) and 52 weeks (extension period).MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database (before April 2016). The studies reporting the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with T2DM were considered. Two authors separately performed data extraction. The differences were discussed and resolved. Pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) or relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed by using either fixed- or random-effects models.ResultsAt the end of the selection process, 7 RCTs were collected and included in the present analysis. Placebo-subtracted WMDs (%) of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were -0.63 (95% CI: -0.77, -0.49) and -0.80 (95% CI: -0.98, -0.62) for canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg, respectively, from baseline to week 26. At week 26, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg significantly reduced the body weight from baseline when compared with that of placebo, with a WMD of -2.23 and -3.00 in percent changes (P < 0.001 for both). The fasting and postmeal glucose, blood pressure (BP), and triglycerides were also reduced. These reductions were sustained over 52 weeks but had no significant differences between the 100 and 300 mg doses. The overall safety of canagliflozin was good, with the exception of high incidence of genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis-related adverse events.ConclusionCanagliflozin was found to reduce HbA1c, fasting and postmeal glucose, body weight, BP, and triglycerides, and it was generally well tolerated in patients with T2DM.

Project description:ImportanceEvidence of effective smoking cessation interventions in patients with diabetes is limited. The unique behavioral and metabolic characteristics of smokers with type 2 diabetes warrants a randomized clinical trial of the smoking cessation drug varenicline.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of varenicline in patients with type 2 diabetes with an intention to quit smoking.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial recruited patients from 6 outpatient clinics in 5 hospitals in Catania, Italy. Patients with type 2 diabetes, who were smoking at least 10 cigarettes a day, and who intended to quit smoking were screened for eligibility. Eligible patients were randomized to either varenicline or placebo treatment. The trial consisted of a 12-week treatment phase followed by a 40-week follow-up, nontreatment phase. Intention-to-treat data analysis was performed from December 2020 to April 2021.InterventionsVarenicline, 1 mg, twice daily or matched placebo administered for 12 weeks. Patients in both treatment groups also received smoking cessation counseling.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary efficacy end point of the study was the continuous abstinence rate (CAR) at weeks 9 to 24. Secondary efficacy end points were the CAR at weeks 9 to 12 and weeks 9 to 52 as well as 7-day point prevalence of abstinence at weeks 12, 24, and 52.ResultsA total of 300 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.4 [0.8] years; 117 men [78.0%] in varenicline group and 119 men [79.3%] in placebo group) were randomized to receive varenicline (n = 150) or placebo (n = 150). The CAR at weeks 9 to 24 was significantly higher for the varenicline than placebo group (24.0% vs 6.0%; odds ratio [OR], 4.95; 95% CI, 2.29-10.70; P < .001). The CARs at weeks 9 to 12 (31.3% vs 7.3%; OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 2.85-11.66; P < .001) and weeks 9 to 52 (18.7% vs 5.3%; OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.79-9.27; P < .001) as well as the 7-day point prevalence of abstinence at weeks 12, 24, and 52 were also significantly higher for the varenicline vs placebo group. The most frequent adverse events occurring in the varenicline group compared with the placebo group were nausea (41 [27.3%] vs 17 [11.4%]), insomnia (29 [19.4%] vs 19 [12.7%]), abnormal dreams (19 [12.7%] vs 5 [3.4%]), anxiety (17 [11.4%] vs 11 [7.3%]), and irritability (14 [9.4%] vs 8 [5.4%]). Serious adverse events were infrequent in both groups and not treatment-related.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this trial showed that inclusion of varenicline in a smoking cessation program is efficacious in achieving long-term abstinence without serious adverse events. Varenicline should be routinely used in diabetes education programs to help patients with type 2 diabetes stop smoking.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01387425.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Imarikiren in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Publications

Efficacy and Safety of Imarikiren in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets