Dataset Information

Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture-a finite element analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10.0-48.8%) and largely unchanged over the past 30?years. Femoral neck fracture is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs.

Methods

In this study, our group designed a plate that combines the strength of both CCS and sliding hip screw, through providing three dynamic screws at a fixed angle with a side-plate, namely the slide compression anatomic place-femoral neck (SCAP-FN). Finite element analyses (FEA) were carried out to compare the outcomes of the combination of our SCAP-FN plate with DHS+DS (derotational screw) and to those of using cannulated screws alone.

Results

SCAP-FN produces more stable fixation with respect to the femur and the stress distributions, stress peaks, and rotational angles.

Conclusions

The FEA encouraged us that in the following biomechanical experiment, SCAP-FN may remain the strengths of both CCS and DHS+DS and show a better performance in resisting shearing and rotational forces, therefore achieving the best stability in terms of smallest displacement and rotational angle.

SUBMITTER: Li J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6419341 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture-a finite element analysis.

Li Jia J Zhao Zhe Z Yin Pengbin P Zhang Licheng L Tang Peifu P

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 20190312 1

<h4>Background</h4>Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10.0-48.8%) and largely unchanged over the past 30 years. Femoral neck fracture is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs.<h4>Methods</h4>In this study, our group designed a ...[more]

PMID: 30871584

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are usually treated by internal fixation (IF) but two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated advantages of treatment with arthroplasty. The complication rate was lowered but there were no clinically improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), which could be due to underpowering or choice of selected PROM as the studies do appear to report a better functional outcome. We will conduct an RCT comparing IF with arthroplasties in patients aged over 65 years with an undisplaced FNF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:All hospitals in Denmark treating patients with hip fracture can provide patients for this study; therefore, the study can be considered a national RCT. Patients over 65 years old with an undisplaced FNF will be screened for eligibility and patients will only be excluded if they are unable to understand the study information (due to dementia or language), if they have a posterior tilt >20°, a pathological fracture or they cannot walk. Participants will be electronically randomised (in alternating blocks of 4 or 6) into either IF or arthroplasty. Postoperative care will follow the department standards.Primary and secondary outcomes and measuring points have been established in collaboration with patients with hip fracture by focus group interviews. The primary outcome measure is the New Mobility Score assessed after 1?year. Secondary outcomes are the Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 domain (EQ-5D-5L), degree of posterior tilt, pain Verbal Rating Scale, reoperation and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (19/7429) and the scientific ethics committee (S-20180036). All participants will sign an informed consent before entering the trial. Because this is a national trial, all relevant healthcare professionals in Denmark will automatically receive the trial results that will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04075461).

Dataset Information

Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture-a finite element analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture-a finite element analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure