Dataset Information

Comparative Outcomes of Adults Hospitalized With Seasonal Influenza A or B Virus Infection: Application of the 7-Category Ordinal Scale.

ABSTRACT: Background:The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in disease severity between influenza A and B among hospitalized adults using a novel ordinal scale and existing clinical outcome end points. Methods:A prospective, observational study was conducted over the 2016-2018 influenza seasons in a central hospital. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical improvement, defined as a decline of 2 categories from admission on a 7-category ordinal scale that ranges from 1 (discharged with normal activity) to 7 (death), or hospital discharge up to day 28. Results:In total, 574 eligible patients were enrolled, including 369 (64.3%) influenza A cases and 205 (35.7%) influenza B cases. The proportion of patients with a worse ordinal scale at admission was higher in influenza A than influenza B (P = .0005). Clinical improvement up to 28 days occurred in 82.4% of patients with influenza A and 90.7% of patients with influenza B (P = .0067). The Cox model indicated that influenza B patients had a higher clinical improvement probability than influenza A cases (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.266; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.019-1.573; P = .0335). A similar pattern was observed in weaning oxygen supplement (adjusted HR, 1.285; 95% CI, 1.030-1.603; P = .0261). In-hospital mortality for influenza A was marginally higher than influenza B (11.4% vs 6.8%; P = .0782). Conclusions:Our findings indicated that hospitalized patients with influenza A were more ill and had delayed clinical improvement compared with those with influenza B virus infection.

SUBMITTER: Wang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6419989 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative Outcomes of Adults Hospitalized With Seasonal Influenza A or B Virus Infection: Application of the 7-Category Ordinal Scale.

Wang Yeming Y Fan Guohui G Horby Peter P Hayden Fredrick F Li Qian Q Wu Qiaoling Q Zou Xiaohui X Li Hui H Zhan Qingyuan Q Wang Chen C Cao Bin B

Open forum infectious diseases 20190215 3

<h4>Background</h4>The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in disease severity between influenza A and B among hospitalized adults using a novel ordinal scale and existing clinical outcome end points.<h4>Methods</h4>A prospective, observational study was conducted over the 2016-2018 influenza seasons in a central hospital. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical improvement, defined as a decline of 2 categories from admission on a 7-category ordinal scale that ranges f ...[more]

PMID: 30895200

Similar Datasets

Project description:RationaleFrom June of 2009 to August of 2010 the influenza subtype H1N1pdm09 caused a worldwide pandemic. The impact on populations and health care systems around the globe evolved differently. Substantial data come from the German national surveillance network in an outpatient and private practice setting, while information on hospitalized patients in Germany is rather limited.MethodsData from the Federal Statistics Office comprising health insurance claims of the entire nationwide inpatient sample from 2005 to 2012 were used to identify patients who were hospitalized for laboratory-confirmed influenza and to analyse demographical aspects, comorbidities, hospitalization duration, outcomes and ventilator use during the pandemic and seasonal waves of influenza.Measurements and main resultsA number of 34,493 admissions for laboratory-confirmed influenza occurred during waves between 2005 and 2012. During the pandemic seasonal waves, the number of hospitalizations vastly surpassed the level that was seen in any of the seasonal waves. A major demographic shift was seen with respect to patient age, as younger patients (< 60 years old) were more frequently hospitalized. Mean length of stay was shorter (149 vs. 193 hours), mean time on ventilation tended to be shorter (261 vs. 305 hours) in young children (< 4 years old) and longer (393 vs. 339 hours) in the elderly (> 60 years old). Time to ventilation was shorter in non-fatal cases (328 vs. 349 hours) and longer in fatal cases (419 vs. 358 hours). Logistic regression was used to show the impact of comorbidities and co-diagnoses on mortality and the need for ventilation, as well as differences between pandemic and seasonal influenza.ConclusionsInpatient data suggest differences in patient populations during pandemic and seasonal influenza. Younger patients were more frequently hospitalized. Differences with respect to the presence of certain comorbidities and co-diagnoses, length of stay, time to ventilation and ventilation time could be identified.

Project description:Abstract Background More effective influenza vaccines are needed to prevent influenza and its complications. Recombinant influenza vaccines may offer better protection than traditional egg-based vaccines. Using a cluster randomized design to estimate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of Flublok Quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) vs. standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV4), we separately reported that RIV4 provided significantly better protection against primary outcome of confirmed influenza in adults 50–64 yrs in the 2018–20 moderately severe influenza seasons. Here we report the rVE against the secondary and exploratory outcomes of hospitalized influenza-related outcomes. Methods We randomized 66 facilities within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) to routinely administer RIV4 or SD-IIV4 to adults, alternating vaccine formulations weekly by facility during the influenza season (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03694392). Hospitalized cases of PCR-confirmed influenza, community-acquired pneumonia, and cardio-respiratory events were prespecified as secondary in 50–64 yrs and exploratory in 18–49 yrs. We estimated the relative hazard ratio (rHR) using Cox regression on a calendar timeline, adjusting for age, sex, and race, using facility-specific stabilized propensity scores. We calculated rVE as (1–rHR) x 100%. Results During the 2018–19 and 2019–20 seasons, the study consisted of 1,630,328 vaccinees 18–64 yrs (RIV4=632,962; SD-IIV4=997,366), and included 95 hospitalized influenza cases after RIV4 and 153 after SD-IIV4 among 50–64 yrs (Table 1). RIV4 vs. SD-IIV4 was not significantly more protective against hospitalized influenza-related outcomes in adults 50–64 yrs or 18–49 yrs. Conclusion While this large cluster randomized study found that RIV4 vs. SD-IIV4 reduced the risk of lab-confirmed influenza in adults 50–64 yrs across 2 influenza seasons, RIV4 and SD-IIV4 performed similarly against hospitalized influenza-related outcomes. Evaluating influenza-related hospitalizations during influenza seasons when more hospital outcomes occur may help to better understand the relative effectiveness of recombinant versus standard inactivated influenza vaccines against severe disease. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Dataset Information

Comparative Outcomes of Adults Hospitalized With Seasonal Influenza A or B Virus Infection: Application of the 7-Category Ordinal Scale.

Publications

Comparative Outcomes of Adults Hospitalized With Seasonal Influenza A or B Virus Infection: Application of the 7-Category Ordinal Scale.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets